Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Kent said:

Errr Trac cant kick goals unfortunately   19 G 30 BH for 2022

Averages just under a goal a game so he isnt going to make much difference

Did you read what I wrote?

Tracc is someone that needs to be constantly involved in the game, he's not opportunistic and therefor provides little value as a stay at home forward

Edited by BW511

 
1 hour ago, BW511 said:

Did you read what I wrote?

Tracc is someone that needs to be constantly involved in the game, he's not opportunistic and therefor provides little value as a stay at home forward

You are saying not a one tracc then?

 
  • Author
16 minutes ago, joeboy said:

WA SEN commentator Paul(?) Haselby said on radio today that he feels Freo may be getting cold feet on the idea of investing so much money into recruiting LJ because of his very average year. It’s a huge risk for them and it would impinge significantly on their efforts to recruit or retain other important players.

I've copied this in from the Grundy thread.

 

It could be face saving by Freo if Jackson has decided to stay/

If he decides to go to WA it opens the door for WCE to make a play.

Whatever happens, the club has handled this in a very mature way that will be noticed by the players and the agents trying to help 20 year olds with life changing decisions.

I hope he stays of course, am sure that we will be fine if he does leave which leads me to the only truth; if LJ stays, Brodie Grundy won’t be a Demon.


10 hours ago, layzie said:

Play Jacko more up forward this week. 

Yeh, unless Max is carrying an injury I'd rather Gawn at 50-70% time in the ruck. Dogga can play more forward and provide some mobility to our forward line. Dogga is more handy when the ball hits the ground so is a tough match up for a defender. Once the ball hits the ground when Max is there he's just about out of the game and our forward entries are very predictable lobbing the ball into him or Brown.

Haselby should know based on his Freo connections, however, we spoke to a couple of Player Managers based in Pert yesterday and the feeling is Jackson will be at Freo next year. 

If Jacko does go, I’m extremely confident that Grundy will be at the Dees. 

22 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

If this is what Healy is saying, we're really ph%&*ed then. 

 
On 9/4/2022 at 2:00 PM, spirit of norm smith said:

Not sure which way LJ will decide.
But having a look through the Dockers list to see if any add-on players could be in a Jackson deal.  Sure we could ask for Haydn Young or Andy Brayshaw but we need to be realistic.  
We could ask for Freo 1st round pick for 2022 & 2023 & a player.  
Ruckman Lloyd Meek could be a good backup for Max Gawn. Meek is a huge 203 cms 105 kgs.  Behind Darcy as the key ruckman.  Another is youngster Josh Treacy could be one to consider. He’s a solid tough young key forward from country Victoria.  Still developing and just turned 20yo.  If we think that Tmcd is close to the end, BBB has probably only 2023 left given his knee issues and the Weid is not the answer, then we need another young key forward to be alongside JVR in years to come. Might be worth checking in on Treacy’s availability as a handy set of “added steak knives” in a deal. 

We could demand Freeo's 1st round pick in 2022, '23 ,24, 25, 26 and 27. And they can throw in Andrew Brayshaw this year as the steak knifes. 

@Smokey - QD comes home and ritualistically opens 'Land to see if Jackson has signed. Thread is on second board. QD thinks, "I'll fix that."


On 9/6/2022 at 8:24 AM, layzie said:

Play Jacko more up forward this week. 

Start him at FF, with Max in the centre square

I was stuck at home today, so I tried to find a way for Melbourne to get value for Jackson (if he doesn't re-sign with us).

I tried to channel our list managers focus on overall outcomes and came up with this 6-club megadeal which actually kinda makes sense.

Things we know or are strongly rumoured about this draft are:
1. Brisbane need points for Ashcroft & Jaspa Fletcher.
2. Western Bulldogs and Lobb are interested in each other.
3. Rankine wants to go back to SA.

Preconditions for this megadeal to work:
1. West Coast need to be willing to split their #2 pick (makes sense to bring in a crop of WA youngsters)
2. Gold Coast need to be willing to trade up from #5 (acquired via Rankine) and #7 to #2 (this could be the opportunity cost required to have a shot at Cadman)

Anyway, in the end the Dees would end up with Pick 5, Pick 20, Freo's 2023 1st round, Gold Coasts 2023 2nd round and Meek or Treacy. We would be giving up Jackson and our 2023 1st round (hopefully #18). 

The full ins and outs are below. Is it a Win-Win-Win-Win-Win-Win deal?

image.png.6eaf2ec607420b94e78677f612425bcd.png

4 minutes ago, rodney_g said:

I was stuck at home today, so I tried to find a way for Melbourne to get value for Jackson (if he doesn't re-sign with us).

I tried to channel our list managers focus on overall outcomes and came up with this 6-club megadeal which actually kinda makes sense.

Things we know or are strongly rumoured about this draft are:
1. Brisbane need points for Ashcroft & Jaspa Fletcher.
2. Western Bulldogs and Lobb are interested in each other.
3. Rankine wants to go back to SA.

Preconditions for this megadeal to work:
1. West Coast need to be willing to split their #2 pick (makes sense to bring in a crop of WA youngsters)
2. Gold Coast need to be willing to trade up from #5 (acquired via Rankine) and #7 to #2 (this could be the opportunity cost required to have a shot at Cadman)

Anyway, in the end the Dees would end up with Pick 5, Pick 20, Freo's 2023 1st round, Gold Coasts 2023 2nd round and Meek or Treacy. We would be giving up Jackson and our 2023 1st round (hopefully #18). 

The full ins and outs are below. Is it a Win-Win-Win-Win-Win-Win deal?

image.png.6eaf2ec607420b94e78677f612425bcd.png

We make out like bandits

Lock it in Eddie 

Gws are demanding 2 first rounders for taranto. Guess that makes Jackson worth 4 first rounders

2 minutes ago, Sideshow Bob said:

Gws are demanding 2 first rounders for taranto. Guess that makes Jackson worth 4 first rounders

Twoomey also reckons hopper is with two first rounders (be it two late teen first rounders) 

by that logic Jackson would be worth 8 first rounders


2 minutes ago, GCDee said:

Twoomey also reckons hopper is with two first rounders (be it two late teen first rounders) 

by that logic Jackson would be worth 8 first rounders

Hopper is a gun and criminally underrated

1 minute ago, adonski said:

Hopper is a gun and criminally underrated

25 year old who should be in his peak averaging under 20 touches as a mid, doesn’t kick goals and doesn’t hurt you with you with his touches. I’d disagree and say he is criminally over rated. 
statistically Tom sparrow offers more and is 3 years younger. Would you expected 2 first rounders for sparrow? 

Just now, GCDee said:

25 year old who should be in his peak averaging under 20 touches as a mid, doesn’t kick goals and doesn’t hurt you with you with his touches. I’d disagree and say he is criminally over rated. 
statistically Tom sparrow offers more and is 3 years younger. Would you expected 2 first rounders for sparrow? 

You've obviously never watched the guy

3 minutes ago, adonski said:

You've obviously never watched the guy

Indeed I have watched him and cannot see what makes him a gun? In fact he ranks elite in only one AFL metric which is goal accuracy only because he almost never takes shots at goal. 
Don’t get me wrong a decent but average footballer in the afl landscape, only guns should be traded for 2 first rounders, he has not proven to be a gun. 
 

10 minutes ago, GCDee said:

25 year old who should be in his peak averaging under 20 touches as a mid, doesn’t kick goals and doesn’t hurt you with you with his touches. I’d disagree and say he is criminally over rated. 
statistically Tom sparrow offers more and is 3 years younger. Would you expected 2 first rounders for sparrow? 

Hopper is still contracted, hence has more currency.


12 minutes ago, GCDee said:

25 year old who should be in his peak averaging under 20 touches as a mid, doesn’t kick goals and doesn’t hurt you with you with his touches. I’d disagree and say he is criminally over rated. 
statistically Tom sparrow offers more and is 3 years younger. Would you expected 2 first rounders for sparrow? 

Hahahaha Tom Sparrow offers more?

Right up there as the funniest things I read on here.

Clearly never seen the bloke play and a good case having your rosy red and blue glasses on here.

Jacob Hopper was in the All Australian squad of 40 last year as a 24 year midfielder who averaged 26.3 disposals per game. Back in 2019 as a 22 year he was averaging 26.q disposal per game.

If he doesn't kick enough goals by your reckoning then what does that say about Clayton Oliver who barely kicks goals himself?

An absolute insult to Hopper that anyone would think Sparrow would offer more as a player. 

There is a reason why a club like Richmond who have won 3 premierships in 5 years are chasing Hopper extremely hard. Enough said.

Edited by dazzledavey36

5 minutes ago, GCDee said:

Indeed I have watched him and cannot see what makes him a gun? In fact he ranks elite in only one AFL metric which is goal accuracy only because he almost never takes shots at goal. 
Don’t get me wrong a decent but average footballer in the afl landscape, only guns should be traded for 2 first rounders, he has not proven to be a gun. 
 

Jackson hasn't proven to be a gun. We should settle for a 1st round pick by your logic.

6 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Hahahaha Tom Sparrow offers more?

Right up there as the funniest things I read on here.

Clearly never seen the bloke play and a good case having your rosy red and blue glasses on here.

Jacob Hopper was in the All Australian squad of 40 last year as a 24 year midfielder who averaged 26.3 disposals per game. Back in 2019 as a 22 year he was averaging 26.q disposal per game.

If he doesn't kick enough goals by your reckoning then what does that say about Clayton Oliver who barely kicks goals himself?

An absolute insult to Hopper that anyone would think Sparrow would offer more as a player. 

There is a reason why a club like Richmond who have won 3 premierships in 5 years are chasing Hopper extremely hard. Enough said.

Clayton doesn’t only touch the ball 19 times a game, you would expect a player playing as many midfield minutes as hopper you would have more than 19 touches with bugger all score involvements. 
 

If you read my post you would see I said baulking at his value of two first rounders, and compared him statistically to Sparrow, which the numbers do not lie. 

One season in what 8 making the AA 40 squad doesn’t give you a value of 2 first rounders. 
He isn’t all Australian, as you alluded to he is a pure mid that has only ever averaged 26 touches in his best season, he doesn’t kick goals, he has little score involvements… so yes I am perplexed at the potential trade value of 2 first rounders.  
 

 
23 minutes ago, mo64 said:

Jackson hasn't proven to be a gun. We should settle for a 1st round pick by your logic.

Jackson isn’t 7 years into the system and stagnated. 
Jackson has proven big game experience and played a vital role in a flag winning team. 
Jackson isn’t in abundance, I hate the term but he is a unicorn.

Jackson’s value is evident by freo offering 800k plus for a 20 year olds signature. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 2 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 157 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 431 replies