Jump to content

Featured Replies

Right now there is 6.1% difference between the Dogs and Brisbane. If the latter have a good night tonight there is a chance the former could miss out on the double chance next week. 

 
11 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Makes a difference when dogs are not smashing the fee kick count.

 

They are a different side for sure when they don’t have the assistance from the umps. There is nothing wrong with today’s umpiring - they always will miss a few but it has been adjudicated exceptionally well today. 

 
5 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

Clarko doing all he can to improve the Hawks’ draft position before he leaves!

Clarkson giving Hawthorn and Kennett the big finger is just beautiful. 

1 minute ago, ucanchoose said:

Remember when we drew with hawthorn and everybody lost their minds?!?!

Guilty as charged. 

This is a big upset brewing.


2 minutes ago, Satan said:

Saints winning would be handy too

Saints winning see the dees the most probable mclelland trophy winner.

21 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Nice, but not so important. Those of us old enough will remember the Dr. Mclelland Trophy 🏆 

Winning September is far more important 

Yep

we had some great under 19 sides and were always solid in the reserves. (Ah... David Cordner)

It was showing up at the big dance where we lacked the skills.

Bulldogs trying to play perfect football in imperfect conditions. Terrific.

 

Still time for the Bulldogs.

Only need 3 late ones to take the free kick count.

Go hawks *vomit*
 

Hi  Sam Mitchell 


24 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Nice, but not so important. Those of us old enough will remember the Dr. Mclelland Trophy 🏆 

 

Ah yes, the Doc McClelland. Hilarious.😂

12 minutes ago, Demon_spurs said:

Im presuming this was a fraudian slip $$$$$

Maybe the cheque bounced?


14 minutes ago, Satan said:

Can I say go hawks

Under these circumstances, yes, but only if it makes you feel like vomit as well

Win tomorrow and gauranteed top 2 gives us the option to rest some players v Geelong if they are going to scrap the bye

As said before, fingers crossed for sixty year curse - feel sorry in 2081


1 minute ago, Demonland said:

Why is Clarkson being given the flick?

Has an outgoing coach ever heaped as much pressure on his successor than Clarko has to Mitchell?

Jeff’s got egg all over his leathery mug, while Clarko contemplates multimillion dollar contracts from Carlton and Collingwood

Only watched Q4  - is it too much a mixed metaphor to say frost seems on fire?

 
8 hours ago, BDA said:

Hawks seem intent on sending Clarko out in style. I reckon they will beat the Doggies today

Do you have a punt by any chance? You would of cleaned up the last two weeks.

1 minute ago, brendan said:

Win tomorrow and gauranteed top 2 gives us the option to rest some players v Geelong if they are going to scrap the bye

Not necessarily. Other games come into play.

 

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 198 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies