Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

It dawned on me in another thread that even though I played and coached for over 30 years I actually really dont fully understand some of the fundamentals of today's game. Basically I have no idea what are the specifics and names of the current day roles / positions on the ground.

Obviously Ruck, def wingman etc makes sense but what are the actual names of other roles? I heard power forwards and speed forward used a few weeks back. 

 

I am sure down the ground vision would explain it. Does anyone know where we can get access to that?

If anyone can enlighten me on the roles and names please do.

 

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

(...and looking like you're itching to get another discombobulator out there, d? Got Neil Crompton's to untangle first though!)

 

Just replace HFF with Midfielder as nearly every club pushes the HFF into the mids.  Move FP to High forwards.

The back 6 and mids haven't changed that much, how they play is a bit different but the role is similar.

 

7 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

and looking like you're itching to get another discombobulator out there, d?

I've got ten more lined up ready to go Timothy, but have held off due to puzzle overload on the site.  At this stage, I may even wait until the off season when there's not much else happening.

Crompton's poser was never solved and I had to PM him to find the answers!


These days it’s all about how you ‘self identify’.

In a work setting I identify as a ‘mercurial forward’ (which is code for I don’t do the hard stuff, and just hope the ball bounces out the back for me to kick easy goals).

This would explain why I’m on Demonland at 1pm on a Thursday.

The old position names aren't as relevant today.  For example, there's no difference between a rover, ruck-rover and centreman

 
1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

Brilliant!

 

3 hours ago, Wizard of Koz said:

It dawned on me in another thread that even though I played and coached for over 30 years I actually really dont fully understand some of the fundamentals of today's game. Basically I have no idea what are the specifics and names of the current day roles / positions on the ground.

Obviously Ruck, def wingman etc makes sense but what are the actual names of other roles? I heard power forwards and speed forward used a few weeks back. 

 

I am sure down the ground vision would explain it. Does anyone know where we can get access to that?

If anyone can enlighten me on the roles and names please do.

The modern game is pretty simple

We have tall midfielders (Ruckmen) and midfielders (everyone else)


half back flank was where you hid your worst player except in schoolboy football it was the wing. (You could stand on a wing all day and never see the ball.)

The position that has clearly disappeared is that of the "follower" or ruck rover.

TBH I coudn't tell you who plays centre for MFC these days

The runner

Talls

Smalls

Sweeper

Quarterback role - yuk

Run with

Stopper

Wicketkeeper 

The Irishman

Impact player

28 minutes ago, radar said:

The runner

Talls

Smalls

Sweeper

Quarterback role - yuk

Run with

Stopper

Wicketkeeper 

The Irishman

Impact player

Thanks Radar....I was looking for Run With...as when your champ is out of sorts play him on the opposition s best and he will be where the ball is...unfortunately in front of the opposition goal


6 hours ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

(...and looking like you're itching to get another discombobulator out there, d? Got Neil Crompton's to untangle first though!)

The original #5 Neil Crompton was a small defender / match winning goal sneak who, it is rumoured, the great late Norm Smith would have dragged for playing too far out of position had he not actually kicked our last grand final winning goal. ?

  • Author
7 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

Great response. I agree with that entirely.

  • Author

So it looks as though the actual roles and the names of those roles are a mystery to us who are probably the most analytical and researched fans of all.

Surely this is the only sport in the world like this. Dr. Drake helped a touch but no names and it was pretty generalised. 

It is odd.

14 hours ago, Wizard of Koz said:

So it looks as though the actual roles and the names of those roles are a mystery to us who are probably the most analytical and researched fans of all.

Surely this is the only sport in the world like this. Dr. Drake helped a touch but no names and it was pretty generalised. 

It is odd.

I think the NBA has moved in a similar way.
Used to have point guard, shooting guard, shooting forward, power forward and center where similar shaped and skilled players filled those roles. 2 tall's for in the paint, 1 medium shooter/defender, 2 smalls - 1 for ball handling and one for shooting.

Nowadays teams play tall and small. In the USA Vs Australia game Devin Booker a point guard was playing technically as a power forward. You cant call him a power forward.

The ball handler has changed too since Lebron/Kobe took over from point guards, so its more here is our 5 individually skilled players playing a role on the court versus your 5 players. They rotate highly through only 7-8 players. 
Like Ben Simmons at the 76ers, hes built like a power forward but plays point guard. 

So I see a similarity with AFL where its more heres our 18 players with jobs and roles against your team and game plan, therefore each teams positions and labels would have some crossover but be unique to the team. 
 

Why is there a high half forward but never a low half forward?

How is a lead up forward different to a leading forward?

Why is a ruck-rover neither a ruckman or a rover?

Intercept defender? Ground ball getter midfielder? Lock in forward? Clearance specialist? Could be anyone.

It seems to me that there is a competition between expert commentators (so-called) to come up with new names that reflect the roles that players fill as well as the positions and that, whereas in the past a position came with an image that tended to define the player who filled that position, today with interchange and zone defence and chaos attacks the old rules no longer apply.

For those who can remember, what would Alf Brown have done? He used to write a match analysis in Friday's Herald (afternoon paper) based on fixed position one-on-ones eg half forward on half back.

At least the footy can still be great to watch especially if the sound is on mute and teams play in the corridor and stay away from down the line.


18 hours ago, george_on_the_outer said:

What about the coaches?  Used to be just the the one in Norm's day.......

Those were the days that we really appreciated the one umpire - with fewer mistakes, less 'showmanship', comparatively less preference for a blessed few sides and more accountable post decision-making. Footy was IMO a better, more involving game to appreciate, as well. Plus, the Dees were a top side.

 

2 hours ago, tiers said:

 

At least the footy can still be great to watch especially if the sound is on mute

If you watch on Kayo, you can stream approx 20-30 seconds behind live and it will line up with your preferred radio commentary team (SEN MMM 3AW)

On 8/5/2021 at 12:28 PM, Demonstone said:

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

Explains why I spent 90% of my game time at ADFA as a “former rover who has lost a yard in pace” to a “big hearted tryer” either or, I still held up the bar quite well after the game 🤣🤣🤣

 
19 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Not sure that was ever a position, radar!

We had a guy called radar, but it was more to do with the size of his ears…

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 10 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 210 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 273 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Geelong

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 60 replies
    Demonland