Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I think Viney out again with his foot problem exposed us today.

We can cover Tomlisin and we have lots of forwards.

Do we have enough quality midfielders aside from CP  CO JV AND JJ?

Who are they please?

 
1 minute ago, leave it to deever said:

I think Viney out again with his foot problem exposed us today.

We can cover Tomlisin and we have lots of forwards.

Do we have enough quality midfielders aside from CP  CO JV AND JJ?

Who are they please?

Sparrow could become one. Harmes was for a few months in 2018. Brayshaw is also good depth although he was real bad today

Harmes is the obvious one missing (whether he's any good anymore is another question). 

Moving Gus permanently to a wing has created this issue (I know he was inside a bit today but won't be back there in a hurry based off today's efforts by himself & Baker).

Think we'll end up targeting a mid/fwd in the offseason who can be the 4th or 5th midfielder but still a damaging forward. Think probably in the Robbie Gray/Shai Bolton type mould. 

Edited by adonski

 

We dont lack depth.  If the midfield go missing, it looks bad.  

The midfield got well beaten in the first half today and we looked terrible.  we offered them first use from the first bounce and it cost us big time.

we have Oliver Trac Brayshaw, Harmes, Sparrow, Jones, Jordan, Kozzie, Melksham.  If Gawn gets back some form we will be OK.  If not, we will be smashed by the swans with Hickey having a good run of games.

We have plenty.  We got slightly outcoached in the first half but made up for it


It seemed bad for a few reasons.

Gawn was torched. So the attacking mindset of the mids went against us badly.

Viney does the defensive stuff allowing Trac and Oliver to play t9 their strengths. Harmes can come and do that role.

We have a week to reset and Goodwin and co will have a plan to (try and ) nullify the Swans mids like Parker and Kennedy.

But in answer, we have depth, but outside Harmes and Brayshaw a lot are untried/new meat ie Jordon, Sparrow.

 

Think long term Rivers' best position may be as a midfielder. Hard as nails, skilful, composure, good overhead mark which few mids are.

Perhaps Bowey to half back to bring River's into the rotation.

Edited by adonski

Oliver, Petracca, Viney, Jordon = 1-4.

Ideally Sparrow would've played but I think they took the opportunity to get him game time on Thursday. He'll be in I'm sure.  Harmes is next in line. That's 6 for 4 or 5 spots.

Brayshaw was bad today but I think if you had a real absence of onballers they'd sharpen him back up with more game time. He's 7.

Vanders after that. Then probably Bailey Laurie who should be playing good VFL footy if not injured.

The issue isn't so much our primary on ballers but they lack of talent of the rotational pieces.

Melksham, Jones and ANB just can't be trusted to rotate on ball. Baker isn't a reliable wingman. Bowey - developing in a different role, and Laurie - injured, are 2 of the right kind of players we need to mix through but that's about all we've got developing.

Utility running players who can rotate on ball or do a role forward, back or on the wing are a big priority.


  • Author
22 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

We dont lack depth.  If the midfield go missing, it looks bad.  

The midfield got well beaten in the first half today and we looked terrible.  we offered them first use from the first bounce and it cost us big time.

we have Oliver Trac Brayshaw, Harmes, Sparrow, Jones, Jordan, Kozzie, Melksham.  If Gawn gets back some form we will be OK.  If not, we will be smashed by the swans with Hickey having a good run of games.

I hope you are correct.

Im my post I did mention Oliver  Trac and Jordan.

Im glad Jordan is tracking well.

I beg to differ though. Trac and Oliver are complete class . Absolute guns.

When Oliver was quite today which happens never we were clearly beaten.

Im concerned if one of these two ever get injured, given Jacks foot issue.

Kozzie is a great option but as for Jones and Melksham I think you are wrong. They are not up to it.

Maybe Gus or Harmes but they havent been great.

 

Edited by leave it to deever

Our midfield didn't turn up until the second half. It was obvious we weren't switched on and Viney does probably change that dynamic further by being out, but it's not good enough from Petracca (had a stinker) and Oliver (was very ordinary early on). These two guys are our elite mids. If they don't turn up, already missing Viney, we look ordinary.

I'd bring in Harmes to play the Viney role and providing Fritsch doesn't get rubbed out, I'd bring in Sparrow for Melksham. The latter uses the ball well usually, but today he made so many mistakes over and over again. He was already on the fringe, I think he has to go and earn a recall. He's lucky and keeps his place in Fritsch's role, if Fritsch gets rubbed out.

2 minutes ago, adonski said:

Think long term Rivers' best position may be as a midfielder. Hard as nails, skilful, composure, good overhead mark which few mids are.

Perhaps Bowey to half back to bring River's into the rotation.

I think 70% game time on a back flank is about the limit of Riv's tank as is, I don't think we'll be seeing him move to the midfield this year. Long term I agree though, if he can build his tank he has a lot of attributes that would be handy in the midfield.

I think Baker in for Viney put the balance off today. If it had been Harmes or Sparrow then we may have looked better. Sparrow looked a class above in the VFL on Thursday, hoping he's ready to take on some more responsibility and go up a gear.

  • Author
10 minutes ago, A F said:

Our midfield didn't turn up until the second half. It was obvious we weren't switched on and Viney does probably change that dynamic further by being out, but it's not good enough from Petracca (had a stinker) and Oliver (was very ordinary early on). These two guys are our elite mids. If they don't turn up, already missing Viney, we look ordinary.

I'd bring in Harmes to play the Viney role and providing Fritsch doesn't get rubbed out, I'd bring in Sparrow for Melksham. The latter uses the ball well usually, but today he made so many mistakes over and over again. He was already on the fringe, I think he has to go and earn a recall. He's lucky and keeps his place in Fritsch's role, if Fritsch gets rubbed out.

I didnt think Trac was too bad. Was not hammmering it but a solid game anyway.

I would like to see Kozzie in the middle more.

Luke J in the ruck is an added bonus the way he gathers at ground level.

Im worried about relplacing Oliver and or Trac if needs be. 


No I don't think we lack dept. I know Thursday's VFL game was a doddle by Sparrow and harmed got leather poisoning from racking up possessions. Don't forget that often Picket starts a game in the middle. Chandler is another small who can play midfield and Lockhart will be a welcome return from injury. I hope as he keeps improving that Bedford will be a midfielder as well.. Remember we also have 2 spare spots in the midseason draft we can fill.

 

Right now Baker, Sparrow, Jordon, Vanders and Harmes isn't scaring any opposition as the 4th midfielder. Shows how big a loss Viney is, because he can easily break loose and get 30 if you don't put time into him.

Not saying Sparrow/Jordon can't be top mids in the future, but right now both look to be more solid contributors to passengers, but that's okay because they're young.

Cant replace your best players. To that end - Replacing Viney is a misnomer. 

Petty will come in and Sparrow I guess, unless they get Brayshaw in there and TMac makes the move this week to the wing.

Brayshaw is as much a winger as TMac and they way his confidence is up - TMac can play anywhere and contribute.

Best 22

Inside - Trac Oliver Viney Jordon (Sparrow Harmes Vandenburg) 

Outside - Langdon Brayshaw (Baker Bowey Laurie) 

Dees might look for a skilled outside runner for the next trade or draft choices. 

I don’t think we lack depth, but we need to be a bit more creative. I’d roll Salem, Sparrow, Hibberd, Rivers, Spargo and even Jacko through as a rover. 


I think not rolling through Salem, Rivers or Pickett through the middle more is something we're not utilising. Even Jackson as a mid instead of ruck.

Plenty of midfieldd depth.  Sparrow will be chomping at the bit to get  midfield time in the AFL, he looks ready.

Salem can also move in there if needed,  as we will still have Hunt, Hibberd and Rivers down back for run and Bowey in reserve if needed.

Can also give Kozzie more spot minutes through there.  Also James Jordon can get an increase in minutes, he doesnt get much game time.

And we have Harmes as backup too.

On 5/2/2021 at 8:28 PM, Pickett2Jackson said:

Plenty of midfieldd depth.  Sparrow will be chomping at the bit to get  midfield time in the AFL, he looks ready.

Salem can also move in there if needed,  as we will still have Hunt, Hibberd and Rivers down back for run and Bowey in reserve if needed.

Can also give Kozzie more spot minutes through there.  Also James Jordon can get an increase in minutes, he doesnt get much game time.

And we have Harmes as backup too.

 

Oh and Luke Jackson goes alright in there too.

 
On 5/2/2021 at 7:14 PM, leave it to deever said:

I think Viney out again with his foot problem exposed us today.

We can cover Tomlisin and we have lots of forwards.

Do we have enough quality midfielders aside from CP  CO JV AND JJ?

Who are they please?

We have more quality mids than most teams, no team can cover missing gun mids perfectly ... we can manage with those that remain and harmes can come in and continue how he started this season in his preferred position

Edited by Demons1858

Viney is criminally underrated on this site and his manic presence around the contest cannot be recreated.

His absence makes a big difference.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 224 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies