Jump to content

Featured Replies

37 minutes ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

Melksham is no longer popular around here, but it's a new year and for me he makes us better if he's perfoming.  I'd like to see how he goes and I can live without Sparrow's 4 disposals.

Fair point.

The coaches may well feel they can't have someone with melksham's talent sitting on the pine.

If they do pick him he better improve his pressure on last year's insipid level

 

It’s interesting seeing the debate of Jetta vs Hibberd. For me I look at it as pure quality and I think Hibberd is ahead of Jetta in most key aspects, I also feel that when he needs to be Hibberd can play defensively. If it was just that change we have a bit of flexibility with Jordon and Sparrow as potential options to move onto a small forward. It’s a really tough call though. 

As for Jonesy and his 300th, he’s doing his role. He’d be in our bottom 8 players but he’s contributed positively every week so far so right now every game he gets isn’t being gifted at all. Moot point right now. 

4 hours ago, Jaded said:

Jetta and Hibberd are not competing for the same spot. Hibberd is competing for a spot with Rivers and Hunt.

Hibberd is not a primarily small shut down defender like Jetta, in fact, he is anything but. His strength is his run and carry off half back.

Jetta has never, nor will ever be a zippy player. He wins contests on pure strength and courage. That has not changed. 

Jetta, if he is to be replaced, needs to be replaced with a small lock-down defender. If there is someone on our list that anyone here thinks will do a better job than Jetta currently,  I am open to suggestions.

 

Hibberd is a better stopper when tasked than given credit. 

 

Didn’t realise Hibbo was a lock down defender. Jetta stays in.

I also don’t recall Melks ever being much of a pressure player either. His strength has always been clean, penetrating delivery into our forward line which he didn’t do last year. Maybe the game has evolved and we can’t carry a player who doesn’t apply enough pressure anymore but I would have though his skillset is want is required to unpick a congested Geelong defence. My concern is his sharpness. If he’s off the pace he’s pretty much useless. I’ll leave it to the brains trust to make the call but it’s a toss of the coin between Melks and Sparrow for mine.

Off topic I know but...

Wondering how hoth brown and weid fit in.

Does Tmac come out?

What if hes going gangbusters.

Does Fritta go to the wing?

Will Jackson get dropped?

Its going to be very interesting as surely having them both in is the ideal.

 


1 hour ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

Hibberd is a better stopper when tasked than given credit. 

I don’t disagree, I just don’t think this is where he excels. Hibberd, Hunt, Salem and Rivers in the same backline seems a touch too risky for me. Too many attacking players, not enough players defending. It will mean Lever will need to play a more 1 on 1 role, which doesn’t suit us so well. 

8 hours ago, IRW said:

Ok  on form in a team that's winning and with  no one kicking the door down to get in  he stays in indefinitel

its amazing its even being spoken about.

Last season and the one before he looked vulnerable because he needed to do more for a crepe team.

He fits in just fine at present

Don’t get me wrong. Not for a moment was I suggesting he doesn’t have a spot in the starting lineup. He does. But I don’t think his looming 300th should be a part of the conversation for “best starting 22”, nor should anybody’s ever be. 

First game live this year.. looking forward to the Bullring bar a half time with a 5 goal lead. 

 
11 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Off topic I know but...

Wondering how hoth brown and weid fit in.

Does Tmac come out?

What if hes going gangbusters.

Does Fritta go to the wing?

Will Jackson get dropped?

Its going to be very interesting as surely having them both in is the ideal.

 

I agree this is the real dilemma. Brown in for McDonald seems likely but listen info to Gus n Gawny joke about the wingers club there is no McDonald. 

And then there Weideman. He and Jackson competing for the same spot. At this stage Weideman probably beings more as a foward but Jackson is improving each week and brings more in the ruck. 

23 minutes ago, SPC said:

First game live this year.. looking forward to the Bullring bar a half time with a 5 goal lead. 

Yeah good luck with the Bullring

Takeaway only last time I was there and the Blazer ran out of draft beer at half time

God the catering at the G is useless


35 minutes ago, Kent said:

Yeah good luck with the Bullring

Takeaway only last time I was there and the Blazer ran out of draft beer at half time

God the catering at the G is useless

SPC You obviously  haven't read The info on this season at the G ( or any where else for that matter).

Have you  ticketed correctly?

Just asking !

Enjoy your new Covid 2021 experience you will be able to watch and drink at the same time BUT NOT celebrate  our win after the game in any MCG Bar!

12 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Off topic I know but...

Wondering how hoth brown and weid fit in.

Does Tmac come out?

What if hes going gangbusters.

Does Fritta go to the wing?

Will Jackson get dropped?

Its going to be very interesting as surely having them both in is the ideal.

 

They prob don't Beever

BBB does but Weed may have to wait depending upon Tmac form and team contribution.

Only an id..t Coach would remove Fritta from the forward line He is the BEST forward  ( Other than Kossie) with all the skills and is irreplaceable there. 
 

No Tommy for wing either as Gus us doing just fine. His shirt passing to forwards leads is elite and greatly under noticed.

Reckon Jacko is a given as he does so much team things plus enables Gawny to peel off forward or back!!

Play BBB and either Tmac or Weid  plus Jacko and Fritta and 2 smalls.

If its not enough pressure make sure the 22 are flexible plus the mad sub. 

Hibberd or Bowey would give us more run as a replacement for Jetta whose disposal under pressure has really deteriorated.

Im thinking Melksham for Sparrow, but even though he isn’t getting a lot of possessions he is one of the best in the team at pressure acts and performs his role.

10 minutes ago, 58er said:

They prob don't Beever

BBB does but Weed may have to wait depending upon Tmac form and team contribution.

Only an id..t Coach would remove Fritta from the forward line He is the BEST forward  ( Other than Kossie) with all the skills and is irreplaceable there. 
 

No Tommy for wing either as Gus us doing just fine. His shirt passing to forwards leads is elite and greatly under noticed.

Reckon Jacko is a given as he does so much team things plus enables Gawny to peel off forward or back!!

Play BBB and either Tmac or Weid  plus Jacko and Fritta and 2 smalls.

If its not enough pressure make sure the 22 are flexible plus the mad sub. 

Who do you reckon is our "mad "sub 58??

2 minutes ago, Kent said:

Who do you reckon is our "mad "sub 58??

Thanks Kent med sub of course maybe  Chandler Again  or Petty? 


24 minutes ago, 58er said:

SPC You obviously  haven't read The info on this season at the G ( or any where else for that matter).

Have you  ticketed correctly?

Just asking !

Enjoy your new Covid 2021 experience you will be able to watch and drink at the same time BUT NOT celebrate  our win after the game in any MCG Bar!

Celebrated the Fremantle win in the Frank Grey Bar on Level 3 till 5pm when the bar closed ...

1 minute ago, 58er said:

Thanks Kent med sub of course maybe  Chandler Again  or Petty? 

Petty may be usefull !

12 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Off topic I know but...

Wondering how hoth brown and weid fit in.

Does Tmac come out?

What if hes going gangbusters.

Does Fritta go to the wing?

Will Jackson get dropped?

Its going to be very interesting as surely having them both in is the ideal.

 

Barring a massive form drop, I can’t see Jackson getting moved out of the team. No doubt Ben Brown and Weideman are better forwards, but Jackson can at least compete down there and would be averaging a goal per game if his kicking had been a bit better.

But Jackson provides such a tactical point of difference with Gawn it’s a huge advantage for Melbourne.

Jackson’s presence enables Gawn to play whatever role is most advantageous on the day and in response to how the opposition is playing.

Neither Brown or Weideman can provide that ruck cut out who can double up as an on baller. As rucks they are both like Gawn in style, but far less capable. they are both either forwards or inferior cut out rucks and nothing else, so having both relatively inflexible players in the team isn’t ideal. But Jackson brings something so different in style to Gawn that it’s very difficult for opponents to plan and structure for both Gawn and Jackson.

I would assume one of Brown or Weideman will come in for McDonald as while Mcdonad has been ok in a couple of games, I doubt he’s going to explode. For all the talk of McDonald on a wing or going back into defence, I just don’t see it as there are clearly superior options in both areas now.

Unless Weideman really dominates in the VFL I’d think Brown would get first chance. Historically he’s a far better forward than Weideman.

Fritsch needs to stay in, he’s a really good mid sized forward and can play as a more ground level forward if required, plus provides flexibility in game as he can move onto the wing or even half back.

It was not long ago Daw was being talked about here as needing to be rushed in due to tall forward emergency, and now we are at the embarrassment of riches stage.

It won’t take much for a couple of injuries or form slumps to get back to only one or two viable choices again.

8 minutes ago, Deestar9 said:

Celebrated the Fremantle win in the Frank Grey Bar on Level 3 till 5pm when the bar closed ...

Well done  like me no stone unturned for a drink or a parking spot!!

Enjoy our win !!' Deestar 

34 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

Im thinking Melksham for Sparrow

I think this will happen this weekend as he can play as a medium tall fwd until brown or weid is available. 

Edited by leave it to deever


27 minutes ago, 58er said:

Thanks Kent med sub of course maybe  Chandler Again  or Petty

I would have thought it likely that the medical sub should be a player with versatility given (based purely on numbers) that the injured player to be replaced is most likely to be anyone other than a key position player. I therefore expect that key position players such as Petty, Weideman and both Browns are unlikely ever to be the sub. A key position player with versatility so they can play on smaller players, onball or on the wing, such as McDonald or May (although obviously I don't mean that May would ever be in this position) might be suitable to be the sub.

On 4/4/2021 at 10:42 PM, titan_uranus said:

Fair re: Sparrow. 4th most pressure acts for both sides despite only 66% time on ground. But on the other side of the coin, just four touches.

Melksham won't offer us that level of pressure but at his best links us up better from the back half to the front.

If we're honest, Melksham's spot is probably being taken by Jones right now.

Hunt is all about balance. The run is important, but to be fair to him he's doing more than that. His bodywork and aggression is better than it's ever been. But yes, his errant kicking is an issue and he needs to tighten that up, and not let himself get completely sucked up the ground too frequently.

Melksham crucially has kicked pressure goals in pressure games, notably in Perth when we beat WC prior to the finals in 2018. He is a big occasion player. He has to prove that tho as we meet our main rivals in the next six weeks. I worry that we have some good servants, who go missing in cut throat games. This is now getting serious as we move towards being genuine contenders, the selection criteria therefore becomes a little different.

 

 
17 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

Jones,Jetta - Out

Melky, Hibbo - In

 

Jones will be playing. 

20 minutes ago, Dannyz said:

Jones will be playing. 

Im not sure how Jones has gone form fringe last year to best 22 this year. Hes slow, adds no pressure, and is playing for himself with little team first actions.  Has burnt free team mates in better positions every game and has instead gone for the glory shot from 50 and missed each time. I agree he'll more than likely get picked but Id play Melky in front of him. Both offer no pressure but at least Melky can hit a target and kick straight. Hibbo comes in to get 2 games match practice before he tags Dusty out of the game ANZAC eve.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 172 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 435 replies