Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Deestroy All said:

So matter of fact. He kicked 4 against a patchwork North reserves under a roof. If Brown and Tomald both kick 5 is he still an automatic in in your mind?

Yes, no matter what happens vs North I would drop McDonald and bring in the Weid.

Its inevitable that McDonald falls apart soon, we should get in ahead of that happening.

 
12 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Yes, no matter what happens vs North I would drop McDonald and bring in the Weid.

Its inevitable that McDonald falls apart soon, we should get in ahead of that happening.

What a ridiculous notion. Based on that logic, we should drop Stephen May because he is 29 and bring in Harry Petty immediately because he is younger and out of contract. Regardless of form. 

18 minutes ago, Tough Kent said:

What a ridiculous notion. Based on that logic, we should drop Stephen May because he is 29 and bring in Harry Petty immediately because he is younger and out of contract. Regardless of form. 

 

 No we obviously shouldn't drop May hes a superstar.    T Mac isn't, hes easily replaceable.

 

Gerard Healy believes virtually every club in the competition should be inquiring about the future of Melbourne forward Sam Weideman, who was overlooked at AFL selection yet again despite brilliant VFL form.

 

Now ask yourself why every team in the comp would want Weid?   It would be so Melbourne to lose our young KPF while going into 2022 with two almost 30 year old injury prone tall forwards.

 

You don't flirt with your form. You pick the side that gets it done for you. If T-Mac's form drops away, you drop him. What message does it say to our players when they are getting dropped because of their birth certificate?

I think you're giving Weid far too little credit. He won't sook up because he's not getting a run at the moment. His time will come. It's a great position for the club to be in. 

It's just unfortunate that he had the preseason injury or he'd be firmly in our best 22. He just has to keep performing in the VFL and his time will come and when it does I'm confident he'll grab the opportunity. Still early days, a long season ahead of us.


2 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Gerard Healy believes virtually every club in the competition should be inquiring about the future of Melbourne forward Sam Weideman, who was overlooked at AFL selection yet again despite brilliant VFL form.

 

Now ask yourself why every team in the comp would want Weid?   It would be so Melbourne to lose our young KPF while going into 2022 with two almost 30 year old injury prone tall forwards.

Not sure Gerard Healy is any more an expert on such things than you or I, either way I wouldn’t be putting any faith that Wied is the future down fwd for us. He is a nearly 24 year old in his 5th year of AFL football played under 50 games and only averaging just over a goal a game. Those aren’t the number of someone who is going to be a star. Hogan in the same time with the club played 71 games and kicked over 150 goals all despite battling multiple injuries and off field issues and he is considered a failure. I think people need some perspective on Wieds career he is a middle of the road player at best.

Edited by Garbo

Six games in...MFCSS..

I want to see The Weid kick 6-7 goals a game for 5-6 weeks before he plays Senior Football. 
so when he gets in the side, he stays there as a KEY FWD
 

 
4 hours ago, Engorged Onion said:

Is it a stretch to say if Sam is not included in next week, it would be prudent for him to be looking elsewhere, as he is not valued enough? (perhaps this is a rhetorical question?) (perhaps that is a rhetorical question also?)

I think Sam is all class when he gets the ball in hand... I look at him and wonder about his urgency at the same time though.

If he is not a pressure forward, then what would be the metrics he needs to be hitting?

So many questions about Sam... 

 

Last time I spoke to his dad (very late last year) this and his attack on contents were two areas his dad and the coaches were encouraging him to work on.

4 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

If he doesn't play next week he will leave to another club at the end of season and we will be stuck with a 30 year old Tom McDonald as our key forward in 2022.  Need I remind everyone of what McDonald did in 2019 and 2020.  

It would be a list management disaster.

#bringintheweid

I don't think you can blame McDonald solely for his form in 2019 / 2020.  He had injuries, was clearly asked to bulk up to play a key position forward role he wasn't suited to and was asked to carry the forward line when the team was playing poorly.  I don't think Weid / Brown would have necessarily done much better.

TMac has always performed better when there are other tall targets in the forwardline and given his running capacity, I think having a mix of Brown / Weid / Jackson in the team will allow us to get the best out of him.


3 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Yes, no matter what happens vs North I would drop McDonald and bring in the Weid.

Its inevitable that McDonald falls apart soon, we should get in ahead of that happening.

Because Weid has done what exactly?

1 hour ago, Garbo said:

Not sure Gerard Healy is any more an expert on such things than you or I, either way I wouldn’t be putting any faith that Wied is the future down fwd for us. He is a nearly 24 year old in his 5th year of AFL football played under 50 games and only averaging just over a goal a game. Those aren’t the number of someone who is going to be a star. Hogan in the same time with the club played 71 games and kicked over 150 goals all despite battling multiple injuries and off field issues and he is considered a failure. I think people need some perspective on Wieds career he is a middle of the road player at best.

It's unbelievable how many don't realise this

29 minutes ago, —coach— said:

Last time I spoke to his dad (very late last year) this and his attack on contents were two areas his dad and the coaches were encouraging him to work on.

Nice to hear.

Was there a distinction made between his technique and tactical awareness on his attacks vs his desire for body contact (or lack thereof), which is more of a  default setting....

I like the lad, but against a deplorable team last night (without BBB) he should have kicked at least 8 goals and owned that forward 50. Frankly im not sure he will ever become the player we all had hoped for.

I just dont know how you can fit BBB, LJ, TMac and Weid into the one forward line. i like Kozzy, Spargs and Fritsch in there to mix it up so you'd have to leave them as-is. 

1 hour ago, Garbo said:

Not sure Gerard Healy is any more an expert on such things than you or I, either way I wouldn’t be putting any faith that Wied is the future down fwd for us. He is a nearly 24 year old in his 5th year of AFL football played under 50 games and only averaging just over a goal a game. Those aren’t the number of someone who is going to be a star. Hogan in the same time with the club played 71 games and kicked over 150 goals all despite battling multiple injuries and off field issues and he is considered a failure. I think people need some perspective on Wieds career he is a middle of the road player at best.

Firstly, young players improve, particularly key forwards. I would argue that Weideman has delivered a similar output to Josh Kennedy (WCE) and Tom Hawkins at the same number of games.

Secondly, in 2020 he was 17th in the league for goals per game at 1.5. He is already much better than a middle of the road player.


I'm still not sold that he's the Messiah so many believe

21 hours ago, Winter Dan said:

I'm the same. Thought Weid showed a lot last year. 

I also suspect Weid is a better option than BBB as I believe Weid has a better rounded game. 

I'm also bias b/c I'm nervous his moving on EOY if he doesn't get games and we need his age bracket. 

Weid better then Brown? Brown kicked 60 goals 3 years in a row. Get real ?

Could someone contact Johnathon Brown and ask him how for an update on how things are going with Weid, so as this MFCSS topic doesn't get further off the rails...

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I want to see The Weid kick 6-7 goals a game for 5-6 weeks before he plays Senior Football. 
so when he gets in the side, he stays there as a KEY FWD
 

 

 

 

I get your point SWYL however he's not playing as the deep forward to really do this.  He jagged 7 two weeks back then played high last week and a mixture of high and deep last night.  He took two grabs in close within range and gave them off and still kicked 4.4 under the roof which was a good result.

The challenge will remain for him playing in the gale forced winds at some of the VFL grounds, primarily at home.

Not sure if he will be a deep key forward back in the ones (if/when he gets back) as surely that will go to BBB.

3 hours ago, Garbo said:

Not sure Gerard Healy is any more an expert on such things than you or I, either way I wouldn’t be putting any faith that Wied is the future down fwd for us. He is a nearly 24 year old in his 5th year of AFL football played under 50 games and only averaging just over a goal a game. Those aren’t the number of someone who is going to be a star. Hogan in the same time with the club played 71 games and kicked over 150 goals all despite battling multiple injuries and off field issues and he is considered a failure. I think people need some perspective on Wieds career he is a middle of the road player at best.

 

2 hours ago, loges said:

It's unbelievable how many don't realise this

I think a lot of people forget that he as a scrawny, weak 18 year kid with bung ankles (I think) when we picked him against Hogan who was a man child finishing a year in the VFL.  Comparing the two is irrelevant.

He showed a lot during the middle of last year but struggled again towards the end when our matches become scrums rather than the open footy that's going on this season.

I don't think he'll ever be a star but believe he is an above average forward and believe he will be a very good role player - similar to TMac with a similar ceiling.  Fortunately for us (and unfortunately for Sam) 2018 TMac has returned.

I'm not sure of the answer if we remain injury free but I do worry about losing a key forward who has another 8 years left at the top level who would get a game for 17 other teams right now if he remains in the twos.

Especially when in my thoughts, he had more of an impact on the first two VFL games of BBB.  

We’re going to have injuries, form slumps, the need to rest players throughout the season. Weideman will get his chance and maybe with the added pressure he’ll become the player we all want to see.


2 hours ago, CYB said:

I like the lad, but against a deplorable team last night (without BBB) he should have kicked at least 8 goals and owned that forward 50. Frankly im not sure he will ever become the player we all had hoped for.

I just dont know how you can fit BBB, LJ, TMac and Weid into the one forward line. i like Kozzy, Spargs and Fritsch in there to mix it up so you'd have to leave them as-is. 

Right now Tmac and LJ are set in concrete. BB and the Weid need to prove they can cut it at senior level. Brown gets his chance this weekend , the Weid will have to wait for someone to drop form or get injured. 

2 hours ago, ucanchoose said:

I'm still not sold that he's the Messiah so many believe

You are not alone.

8 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Yes, no matter what happens vs North I would drop McDonald and bring in the Weid.

Its inevitable that McDonald falls apart soon, we should get in ahead of that happening.

There’ve been some silly comments on here, but that’s gotta be right up there. So it doesn’t matter if TMac has a dominant game and is in close to career best form, you drop him just because you think it’s inevitable that he falls apart soon. 

What if this year is some of the best footy he’s playing but dropping him kills his confidence?

TMac plays until he loses form (over two week period minimum) or gets injured, simple as that. I would look at “managing” Tom at some point, which will give Weid his chance to shine and should Sam perform well it becomes his spot to lose. 

 
5 hours ago, Engorged Onion said:

Nice to hear.

Was there a distinction made between his technique and tactical awareness on his attacks vs his desire for body contact (or lack thereof), which is more of a  default setting....

 Not really, was more a case of using his size to be confident in attacking the ball then following up that effort if the ball comes to ground

8 hours ago, ucanchoose said:

I'm still not sold that he's the Messiah so many believe

Maybe he’s just a naughty boy.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 123 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 381 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Angry
      • Love
      • Like
    • 47 replies