Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Disappointing, would have been brilliant for us on off the backline.  I do wonder if Carlton are leaving themselves open for a raid of their younger talent with the amount they are spending on flankers.

This surely must become an issue for them soon. 

 
8 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

Martin and saad are line coaches?

18 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

Im wondering the exact same thing. When Kelly goes on the market next year, dont surprised with a Blues 5 year 1M dollar offer. 

 
38 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

We missed a golden oppurtunity last year with Jack Martin....and theyve done us again with Saad. Deep pockets and lots of brown paper bags down there at carlton. imo he was exactly what we needed. 

 

 

23 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing once again that we've missed out on a player that fits a great need for us.

Carlton are building a potent list while we have more holes then a Swiss cheese with ours.

They've done exceptionally well.

Yeah, very disappointing that we didn't appear to get heavily involved, he would have really made a difference to our list and obviously was there to be convinced. 

13 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Disappointing, would have been brilliant for us on off the backline.  I do wonder if Carlton are leaving themselves open for a raid of their younger talent with the amount they are spending on flankers.

I do think we need to test their capacity to retain their players now. Curnow OOC in 2023 I believe, but McKay comes out of contract next year, let's get into him now. Petrevski-Seton the other one I'd try and persuade.

26 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

They drastically front-end Martin's salary for year 1 so no-one else would take him in the preseason draft last year.  I believe next year it drops back to average levels. 

So at face value that saving pays for either Saad or Williams.  Also, Simpson and Kreuzer have retired  so that probably pays for the other.

What is unclear is how they are going to fit them into the much lower sal cap.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


Carltons strategy must be load up on Half Backs as their midfield is so poor they know they will lose all the centre clearances. 

clever

You seriously have to wonder where the cap room is coming from, even with Simpson and Kreuz retiring.

I think they must be about to dump a couple of players to make room.

Jack SOS looks gone.

Casboult might be another.

I'm confused. I know many of you have strong opinions but what is it about Carlton that gets players to the club? Simply $$$? Unbelievably, they've performed worse than us over the past decade or so. And why do we complain about salaries when they just dish out whatever to whoever? Have they backed themselves into a corner? Something seems off. 

 
Just now, Skuit said:

I'm confused. I know many of you have strong opinions but what is it about Carlton that gets players to the club? Simply $$$? Unbelievably, they've performed worse than us over the past decade or so. And why do we complain about salaries when they just dish out whatever to whoever? Have they backed themselves into a corner? Something seems off. 

In this case it's definitely a massive over the top contract offer. 

Sorry Saad is over rated. Carlscum can have him and they can also go and get .......

Edited by dl4e


48 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

Martin was only on a big 1st year contract to stop other teams drafting him.  The wage drops significantly in year 2.

Williams is definitely not on 800+

Edited by Demons11

Carlton are not going to have a fun time getting this trade done. 

59 minutes ago, A F said:

I reckon they're massively overspending on guys who aren't core members of the team. If they were spending big and bringing in the likes of Patrick Cripps, sure, but they're spending massive dollars on half forwards and half backs. They are still yet to address their midfield. 

What happens when Charlie Curnow makes it back (if he does)? Where do they find the money to pay him? How do they find the money to fit in another midfielder or two that they desperately need?

Carlton have a good spine, but their midfield is weak and unless they vastly improve this, they won't win a flag.

This makes no sense. They have a great young spine as you say, so they don’t need to invest there, hence they’re investing in other areas. Jones/Weitering/Cripps/Curnow/McKay is a top 6 spine. They just have a lot of ordinary players still getting a game. Adding Williams and Saad improves then immediately... 

Edited by adsy

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing once again that we've missed out on a player that fits a great need for us.

Carlton are building a potent list while we have more holes then a Swiss cheese with ours.

They've done exceptionally well.

Disagree. If we've got Swiss cheese holes, they've got a hole right down the middle of a sandwich. Their midfield is essentially one player.

28 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Carlton are not going to have a fun time getting this trade done. 

With Danniher and Saad going it sounds like it will be an 'exciting' trade period.

But we all kow Dodo will stall until the last day wasting everyones time. 

Good times ahead


31 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Carlton are not going to have a fun time getting this trade done. 

Dodoro will ask for Cripps, Walsh and Curnow.

39 minutes ago, adsy said:

This makes no sense. They have a great young spine as you say, so they don’t need to invest there, hence they’re investing in other areas. Jones/Weitering/Cripps/Curnow/McKay is a top 6 spine. They just have a lot of ordinary players still getting a game. Adding Williams and Saad improves then immediately... 

My whole point was that they have an ordinary midfield. As we say on Demonland, midfields win premierships, not spines.

46 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

In this case it's definitely a massive over the top contract offer. 

Listen to Patches when he posts. ?

14 minutes ago, Unleash Hell said:

With Danniher and Saad going it sounds like it will be an 'exciting' trade period.

But we all kow Dodo will stall until the last day wasting everyones time. 

Good times ahead

I'm just trying to work out when we'll be able to get a deal done for Merrett. ;)

1 hour ago, Wells 11 said:

We missed a golden oppurtunity last year with Jack Martin....and theyve done us again with Saad. Deep pockets and lots of brown paper bags down there at carlton. imo he was exactly what we needed. 

 

I think you mean Dan Butler.

 

Martin and Saad meh.


1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing once again that we've missed out on a player that fits a great need for us.

Carlton are building a potent list while we have more holes then a Swiss cheese with ours.

They've done exceptionally well.

Agree he’s what we needed but If its with a Jack Martin or Mitch McGovern size deal they can have him. 

1 hour ago, Nascent said:

Disappointing, would have been brilliant for us on off the backline.  I do wonder if Carlton are leaving themselves open for a raid of their younger talent with the amount they are spending on flankers.

One reason they have so much cap space is their next generation of mids - Dow, O'Brien, Stocker and even Kennedy and Setterfield haven't come on nearly as well as predicted.

Williams should play as a full time midfielder and Martin should rotate in.

Depth and trying to find a way to bring in any future recruits might be an issue.

Ha I didn't care we he goes, just funny he wants out of essendon. Hopefully daniher follows. Suddenly players don't want to be there. 

 
2 hours ago, A F said:

I reckon they're massively overspending on guys who aren't core members of the team. If they were spending big and bringing in the likes of Patrick Cripps, sure, but they're spending massive dollars on half forwards and half backs. They are still yet to address their midfield. 

What happens when Charlie Curnow makes it back (if he does)? Where do they find the money to pay him? How do they find the money to fit in another midfielder or two that they desperately need?

Carlton have a good spine, but their midfield is weak and unless they vastly improve this, they won't win a flag.

Williams tore Collingwood apart in a prelim this time a year ago, he would've been a full time midfielder at any club other than GWS.  Walsh is ready to move on ball - though they do need a wing replacement. For some odd reason Teague was more focussed on using Walsh's run to help the teams outside game rather than just releasing him as an inside beast. Cripps, Walsh, Williams is a great start to a midfield.

If Martin wants to be his best he'll rotate in. Saad they plan to use in the Kade Simpson sweeper role. If he gets 20 kicks a game up the ground rather than deep he's a core part of the team.

There's always enough cash to pay everyone. My concern for the Blues would be they've quickly accelerated their time line adding a pair of 26 year olds and their depth is shoddy.

 

Norf just missed out. lol.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies