Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Disappointing, would have been brilliant for us on off the backline.  I do wonder if Carlton are leaving themselves open for a raid of their younger talent with the amount they are spending on flankers.

This surely must become an issue for them soon. 

 
8 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

Martin and saad are line coaches?

18 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

Im wondering the exact same thing. When Kelly goes on the market next year, dont surprised with a Blues 5 year 1M dollar offer. 

 
38 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

We missed a golden oppurtunity last year with Jack Martin....and theyve done us again with Saad. Deep pockets and lots of brown paper bags down there at carlton. imo he was exactly what we needed. 

 

 

23 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing once again that we've missed out on a player that fits a great need for us.

Carlton are building a potent list while we have more holes then a Swiss cheese with ours.

They've done exceptionally well.

Yeah, very disappointing that we didn't appear to get heavily involved, he would have really made a difference to our list and obviously was there to be convinced. 

13 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Disappointing, would have been brilliant for us on off the backline.  I do wonder if Carlton are leaving themselves open for a raid of their younger talent with the amount they are spending on flankers.

I do think we need to test their capacity to retain their players now. Curnow OOC in 2023 I believe, but McKay comes out of contract next year, let's get into him now. Petrevski-Seton the other one I'd try and persuade.

26 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

They drastically front-end Martin's salary for year 1 so no-one else would take him in the preseason draft last year.  I believe next year it drops back to average levels. 

So at face value that saving pays for either Saad or Williams.  Also, Simpson and Kreuzer have retired  so that probably pays for the other.

What is unclear is how they are going to fit them into the much lower sal cap.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


Carltons strategy must be load up on Half Backs as their midfield is so poor they know they will lose all the centre clearances. 

clever

You seriously have to wonder where the cap room is coming from, even with Simpson and Kreuz retiring.

I think they must be about to dump a couple of players to make room.

Jack SOS looks gone.

Casboult might be another.

I'm confused. I know many of you have strong opinions but what is it about Carlton that gets players to the club? Simply $$$? Unbelievably, they've performed worse than us over the past decade or so. And why do we complain about salaries when they just dish out whatever to whoever? Have they backed themselves into a corner? Something seems off. 

 
Just now, Skuit said:

I'm confused. I know many of you have strong opinions but what is it about Carlton that gets players to the club? Simply $$$? Unbelievably, they've performed worse than us over the past decade or so. And why do we complain about salaries when they just dish out whatever to whoever? Have they backed themselves into a corner? Something seems off. 

In this case it's definitely a massive over the top contract offer. 

Sorry Saad is over rated. Carlscum can have him and they can also go and get .......

Edited by dl4e


48 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He has something we need, so it's disappointing to miss out yet again.

But also, how are the Blues able to pay all these players under the salary cap?
Jack Martin was the 6th highest paid player in the league this year, on more than Bontempelli, Dangerfield, Gawn, Neale etc. How can they afford to pay Saad 700k+ and Williams 800k+. It doesn't add up...

Martin was only on a big 1st year contract to stop other teams drafting him.  The wage drops significantly in year 2.

Williams is definitely not on 800+

Edited by Demons11

Carlton are not going to have a fun time getting this trade done. 

59 minutes ago, A F said:

I reckon they're massively overspending on guys who aren't core members of the team. If they were spending big and bringing in the likes of Patrick Cripps, sure, but they're spending massive dollars on half forwards and half backs. They are still yet to address their midfield. 

What happens when Charlie Curnow makes it back (if he does)? Where do they find the money to pay him? How do they find the money to fit in another midfielder or two that they desperately need?

Carlton have a good spine, but their midfield is weak and unless they vastly improve this, they won't win a flag.

This makes no sense. They have a great young spine as you say, so they don’t need to invest there, hence they’re investing in other areas. Jones/Weitering/Cripps/Curnow/McKay is a top 6 spine. They just have a lot of ordinary players still getting a game. Adding Williams and Saad improves then immediately... 

Edited by adsy

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing once again that we've missed out on a player that fits a great need for us.

Carlton are building a potent list while we have more holes then a Swiss cheese with ours.

They've done exceptionally well.

Disagree. If we've got Swiss cheese holes, they've got a hole right down the middle of a sandwich. Their midfield is essentially one player.

28 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Carlton are not going to have a fun time getting this trade done. 

With Danniher and Saad going it sounds like it will be an 'exciting' trade period.

But we all kow Dodo will stall until the last day wasting everyones time. 

Good times ahead


31 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Carlton are not going to have a fun time getting this trade done. 

Dodoro will ask for Cripps, Walsh and Curnow.

39 minutes ago, adsy said:

This makes no sense. They have a great young spine as you say, so they don’t need to invest there, hence they’re investing in other areas. Jones/Weitering/Cripps/Curnow/McKay is a top 6 spine. They just have a lot of ordinary players still getting a game. Adding Williams and Saad improves then immediately... 

My whole point was that they have an ordinary midfield. As we say on Demonland, midfields win premierships, not spines.

46 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

In this case it's definitely a massive over the top contract offer. 

Listen to Patches when he posts. ?

14 minutes ago, Unleash Hell said:

With Danniher and Saad going it sounds like it will be an 'exciting' trade period.

But we all kow Dodo will stall until the last day wasting everyones time. 

Good times ahead

I'm just trying to work out when we'll be able to get a deal done for Merrett. ;)

1 hour ago, Wells 11 said:

We missed a golden oppurtunity last year with Jack Martin....and theyve done us again with Saad. Deep pockets and lots of brown paper bags down there at carlton. imo he was exactly what we needed. 

 

I think you mean Dan Butler.

 

Martin and Saad meh.


1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing once again that we've missed out on a player that fits a great need for us.

Carlton are building a potent list while we have more holes then a Swiss cheese with ours.

They've done exceptionally well.

Agree he’s what we needed but If its with a Jack Martin or Mitch McGovern size deal they can have him. 

1 hour ago, Nascent said:

Disappointing, would have been brilliant for us on off the backline.  I do wonder if Carlton are leaving themselves open for a raid of their younger talent with the amount they are spending on flankers.

One reason they have so much cap space is their next generation of mids - Dow, O'Brien, Stocker and even Kennedy and Setterfield haven't come on nearly as well as predicted.

Williams should play as a full time midfielder and Martin should rotate in.

Depth and trying to find a way to bring in any future recruits might be an issue.

Ha I didn't care we he goes, just funny he wants out of essendon. Hopefully daniher follows. Suddenly players don't want to be there. 

 
2 hours ago, A F said:

I reckon they're massively overspending on guys who aren't core members of the team. If they were spending big and bringing in the likes of Patrick Cripps, sure, but they're spending massive dollars on half forwards and half backs. They are still yet to address their midfield. 

What happens when Charlie Curnow makes it back (if he does)? Where do they find the money to pay him? How do they find the money to fit in another midfielder or two that they desperately need?

Carlton have a good spine, but their midfield is weak and unless they vastly improve this, they won't win a flag.

Williams tore Collingwood apart in a prelim this time a year ago, he would've been a full time midfielder at any club other than GWS.  Walsh is ready to move on ball - though they do need a wing replacement. For some odd reason Teague was more focussed on using Walsh's run to help the teams outside game rather than just releasing him as an inside beast. Cripps, Walsh, Williams is a great start to a midfield.

If Martin wants to be his best he'll rotate in. Saad they plan to use in the Kade Simpson sweeper role. If he gets 20 kicks a game up the ground rather than deep he's a core part of the team.

There's always enough cash to pay everyone. My concern for the Blues would be they've quickly accelerated their time line adding a pair of 26 year olds and their depth is shoddy.

 

Norf just missed out. lol.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 178 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies