Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

How was Max then? Terribly dumb football. 


wen wil AFL get rid of Mumford who hunts others - and gets a fine and another fine - all paid by the AFL!

That fat [censored] Mummy getting pantsed by Gawn so, true to form, starts going for the cheap dog shots behind play. 
God I can’t stand this manufactured, soulless garbage club. 

Petracca will be buzzed after that goal, that’s what we need

 

Well all i wanted was for them to have a dip. And they are

Am loving this but fighting back feelings of last 2 game dissappointments.

Pickett is playing well.

 


So that mumford thuggish cnut takes Carrie's head off and the corrupt maggot umpire plucks a free from between his stinkcheeks to Greene? WTF?

Very good start from us, bar a few of the usual turnovers.

What was really pleasing was the fact that we transitioned the ball well from defence and made them pay on the scoreboard.  Pickett was dangerous and I've liked Baker's efforts on the opposite wing to Langdon, who is also playing well.

Been pleased with our tall backs as well.  They haven't given their talls a sniff.

Q1 observations

- What a goal by Trac!

- BS 50 against Lever

- Generally excellent, great creative movement. The boys look hungry, but...

- WHERE THE HELL HAS THIS EFFORT AND INTENSITY BEEN!?! 


1 minute ago, Jaded said:

That fat [censored] Mummy getting pantsed by Gawn so, true to form, starts going for the cheap dog shots behind play. 
God I can’t stand this manufactured, soulless garbage club. 

not a club; they're a franchise!

Just now, gs77 said:

So that mumford thuggish cnut takes Carrie's head off and the corrupt maggot umpire plucks a free from between his stinkcheeks to Greene? WTF?

No free to Greene. We got the free and Gawn turned it over immediately. 

Just now, Demon_spurs said:

Well all i wanted was for them to have a dip. And they are

It's good bit you just shake your head and think "where was this the last two games"


Just a lack of game awareness by Max. He should have known there were 30 seconds to go. Pump it deep and maybe get a cheeky one. 

14 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

When you look at who the poster is that is driving that discussion, it makes some sense.

No it doesn't coz he was the first D'lander to get hot on him early in the draft.  Gone cold for some reason.  I was the 2nd lol.

 

Good start. At times excellent start.

Gawn's late turnover was terrible. No game awareness and a bad option to boot. But he's creating so much through the middle. Mumford's a [censored].

Let's hope we can keep this up. 5 goal quarters and 3 goal leads early are nice things. 

Just now, RedButMostlyBlue said:

Q1 observations

- What a goal by Trac!

- BS 50 against Lever

- Generally excellent, great creative movement. The boys look hungry, but...

- WHERE THE HELL HAS THIS EFFORT AND INTENSITY BEEN!?! 

That's the bit that hangs over this game.  I mean, it's great to see us playing well, but why can't we do this in the previous two games?  In both we came out listless and uninspired.  Tonight we look like a Top 8 team.  It's frustrating to say the least.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 180 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 329 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies