Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Don't you love trade period..

 

I follow these guys on twitter too but can't remember or confirm whether they get good mail or are just repeating news/rumours reported elsewhere.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

We'll be spending 125% of the cap if we try and pull that one off.

I’ll freely admit to not knowing in detail how TPP and caps etc work but if GWS don’t have to spend on Cameron then they pay Tmacs contract should he end up there. 
If we don’t have to pay Tmacs contract, we have enough cap to throw at Polec and Brown?

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, McQueen said:

I’ll freely admit to not knowing in detail how TPP and caps etc work but if GWS don’t have to spend on Cameron then they pay Tmacs contract should he end up there. 
If we don’t have to pay Tmacs contract, we have enough cap to throw at Polec and Brown?

Totally agree Steve - I was more taking the pizz with that post as Brown will be on decent coin and we know Polec is on a large contract.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I reckon we'll have to get all of Tom's wages off our books and get North to pay some of Polec's contract if we're any chance.

If we can get picks for Phillips, I reckon he's the cheaper (with less baggage) version to compliment Smith.

I'd of course take all three if the cap was not a reality, but it is and we need to find a small forward or two at other clubs as well.

I assume we're putting a healthy contract extension in front of Oliver too and even Petracca. There's only so much money to go around.

Edited by A F
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Don't you love trade period..

 

Yes please to all three.

I have never been huge on Polec but he could get his [censored] together and be a gun on the wing for us.

GWS doing us a huge favour by taking T mac.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Yes please to all three.

I have never been huge on Polec but he could get his [censored] together and be a gun on the wing for us.

GWS doing us a huge favour by taking T mac.

They will have a massive hole in their TPP now with so many wanting out and need to pay someone - draftee's unlikely to resolve the issue for them, - I think they are well served for KPF even with Cameron leaving, but they may want some insurance there and down back with Corr going as well. 

Edited by grazman
  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, A F said:

I reckon we'll have to get all of Tom's wages off our books and get North to pay some of Polec's contract if we're any chance.

If we can get picks for Phillips, I reckon he's the cheaper (with less baggage) version to compliment Smith.

I'd of course take all three if the cap was not a reality, but it is and we need to find a small forward or two at other clubs as well.

I assume we're putting a healthy contract extension in front of Oliver too and even Petracca. There's only so much money to go around.

Why do people think we're going to take 2 wingman? If there are 3 that are available/getable we'd only be going after one wouldn't we. Realistically and not in a Dees fans fever dream of having an abundance of the once rare wingman.

  • Like 3
Posted
47 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

I have never been huge on Polec but he could get his [censored] together and be a gun on the wing for us.

I bet that's exactly what each of the three [censored] clubs he's been at have thought.

He needs to stay very clear of MFC, absolute plague of a player. 

Posted

Hannan and Oscar were both on reasonable coin i believe so both leaving would take a bit of pressure off things, Tmac is the big one, he's on A grader $$ i reckon if the Giants were willing to take on his salary we'd ask for very little in a trade. 

  • Like 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Why do people think we're going to take 2 wingman? If there are 3 that are available/getable we'd only be going after one wouldn't we. Realistically and not in a Dees fans fever dream of having an abundance of the once rare wingman.

Getting two wingman allows us to play one off half back and one on the opposite wing to Langdon. The reason I like the idea of a third new wingman is improving our ball movement playing one forward of centre on a half forward flank. We'd also have genuine depth for the wing position all of a sudden.

As for ages, Smith won't be around for long, so having Phillips and Polec to compliment Langdon, would give us 5+ years of service on our wings.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, McQueen said:

I’ll freely admit to not knowing in detail how TPP and caps etc work but if GWS don’t have to spend on Cameron then they pay Tmacs contract should he end up there. 
If we don’t have to pay Tmacs contract, we have enough cap to throw at Polec and Brown?

Would we be stretching the friendship if we got them to take Oscar as well? I mean it would keep the brothers together for starters.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Hannan and Oscar were both on reasonable coin i believe so both leaving would take a bit of pressure off things, Tmac is the big one, he's on A grader $$ i reckon if the Giants were willing to take on his salary we'd ask for very little in a trade. 

Moving TMac on without having to pay any of his wages next year would be an unbelievable outcome. Asking for something in return would be really pushing our luck.

Posted
20 minutes ago, MO FINE said:

Would we be stretching the friendship if we got them to take Oscar as well? I mean it would keep the brothers together for starters.

Short answer. 
 

ICGAF. 

Posted

With Smith to Geelong this thread needs to be on page 1.

Brown + Polec for 2021 1st?

  • Like 2
  • Shocked 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

With Smith to Geelong this thread needs to be on page 1.

Brown + Polec for 2021 1st?

Just not sure if Polec will cost too much ($ not picks).

Posted
22 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

With Smith to Geelong this thread needs to be on page 1.

Brown + Polec for 2021 1st?

While I'm all for getting Brown and Polec in the one transaction, no way would I give up a future 1st rounder for them!

McDonald to Essendon or Collingwood for a 3rd rounder and use that pick with Pick 23 to North for Brown and Polec is a bit more like it.

  • Like 2
  • Shocked 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

With Smith to Geelong this thread needs to be on page 1.

Brown + Polec for 2021 1st?

What happens to Polec's contract?

Posted

No. If Phillips is available, then he’s cheaper in terms of draft picks # and contract $$$.  Polec still has question marks over why he is looking at a 4th club now.  I’m a No on Polec as it stands today. 

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

With Smith to Geelong this thread needs to be on page 1.

Brown + Polec for 2021 1st?

Pick 18 for Brown and Polec?  I could be OK with that  ?

seriously though, we don't need Polec's wages and I don't rate him.  I'd prefer we do the second rounder for Brown as a stand alone deal.

Posted
38 minutes ago, MadAsHell said:

While I'm all for getting Brown and Polec in the one transaction, no way would I give up a future 1st rounder for them!

McDonald to Essendon or Collingwood for a 3rd rounder and use that pick with Pick 23 to North for Brown and Polec is a bit more like it.

 

36 minutes ago, A F said:

What happens to Polec's contract?

North will have salary cap to burn. They don't need to get Polec's salary off their books, they'd rather pay some of it and get early picks.

  • Like 2
Posted

Potentially could be 2021 1st and TMac for Brown and Polec, with a chunk of TMac’s and Polec’s wages paid by North. 

As much as first round picks are important, cap space is the most important asset in a world with free agency. 

Posted
2 hours ago, MadAsHell said:

While I'm all for getting Brown and Polec in the one transaction, no way would I give up a future 1st rounder for them!

McDonald to Essendon or Collingwood for a 3rd rounder and use that pick with Pick 23 to North for Brown and Polec is a bit more like it.

Norf likely to have to pay for some of his salary if he moves ...

Posted
On 10/23/2020 at 7:24 PM, dazzledavey36 said:

Don't you love trade period..

 

And the GWS list manager says they are not interested in Tom. Love this time of year. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...