Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, binman said:

An no access to the MCG!

I don't want to sit right behind or beside some virulent, COVID loving, anti vaxer, conspiracy theorist, Pete Evans wanna be, wack job yelling abuse at a dees player, or worse an umpire for not policing the rules properly.

I trust you mean "virulent" in its meaning of "infectious" rather than the more common interpretation of "hostile".

An earlier poster claims not be an anti-vaxxer because he/she will have vaccinations that protect his/her own health but doesn't seem to understand that vaccinations are necessary to stop the spread of infection to others.

 
3 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I trust you mean "virulent" in its meaning of "infectious" rather than the more common interpretation of "hostile".

An earlier poster claims not be an anti-vaxxer because he/she will have vaccinations that protect his/her own health but doesn't seem to understand that vaccinations are necessary to stop the spread of infection to others.

Indeed. It was a conscious use of the the word virulent.

Though you could also argue refusing to do something as simple as vaccinate yourself against a virus that you may not be worried about contracting but that as the daily numbers in Victoria show can be deadly for some and have a serious impact on many (even if that is having to be off work for two weeks) could be considered an act of hostility.  

2 hours ago, binman said:

Love it.

Another slogan for a t shirt. 

Or even better a mask!

taking orders now Binman what colour you want?

 
12 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

 

Mandatory flu vaccines are a bad thing yes.  Ask yourself why they would push a mandatory vaccine for a virus with a better than 99% survival rate that only kills the elderly and the very rare person under 60 who already have underlying medical issues?  

And before you call me an anti vaxxer, no....  I have had various vaccinations in the past such as Malaria and Hep A for travels and what not.

Was more than happy to take those, but as far as this new virus goes my immune system will do just fine thanks.  As will yours I'm sure and 90% of peoples.

 

P to J you are rather Deficient in some aspects of this Covid virus!

There are Many of all ages who have contracted the virus who are  not In the vulnerable category primarily 60 and over and Others who have pre existing conditions ( same ones that are not enabling the aged to recover in many instances) eg heart, respiratory, and pneumonia and other breathing and immune deficiencies which can be at high risk.

Evidence of this  group and indeed a Covid   Patient is that the virus can affect the body and ongoing health arise as side effects in the future not necessarily serious straight away.

Like the war veterans groups like this are notoriously ignored by health and Govt assistance down the track.

The vaccine should play its part for all but so should each person in society consider all categories in society just because they have not been in hospital or subject to serious illness to the ones that side effects will or may diminish  their quality of life in the future.0

12 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

 

Mandatory flu vaccines are a bad thing yes.  Ask yourself why they would push a mandatory vaccine for a virus with a better than 99% survival rate that only kills the elderly and the very rare person under 60 who already have underlying medical issues?  

And before you call me an anti vaxxer, no....  I have had various vaccinations in the past such as Malaria and Hep A for travels and what not.

Was more than happy to take those, but as far as this new virus goes my immune system will do just fine thanks.  As will yours I'm sure and 90% of peoples.

So you are happy that we all go back into Stage 3 or 4 lockdown every time there are a series of breakouts and our health and hospital systems can't manage the workload and they are getting covid.  Hospital wards close and fewer and fewer non covid procedures are carried out.  Shops close, schools close, restaurants close, no concerts, football, cinemas etc etc. 

I truly hope that you and your family do not get this wretched virus, are not one of the frontline workers or someone who will lose their job or lose their business because of the lockdowns. 

One way or another everyone suffers from outbreaks.

Won't happen?  Look at New Zealand.  No cases for 3 months then within a week there are a hundred cases and Auckland goes into lockdown.  Not sure they yet know how this 'patient zero' caught it.

Lockdowns will continue until there is widespread vaccination.

It isn't about protecting you.   Its about protecting everyone around you that you might infect.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Any volunteers to try out that vaccine that Vlad's mob claim to have produced?

In their defence they just accelerated the phase 3 process and offered it on a voluntary basis to health care workers.The West like to criticize but in the circumstances it's an approach worth considering.

Reading some stuff on this the "good" thing about this virus is that because it is comparatively benign so too are the vaccines. (Nothing like the risks of injecting people with smallpox etc) The likelihood of side affects are low. Whether they work is the big question.

Interesting ethical debates on whether "challenge testing"should be allowed. This is where a vaccinated person is deliberately exposed to the virus. The problem with "normal'testing is that your chances of picking up the virus is around one in five hundred at worst even in the heavily exposed countries so you need massive numbers to determine its efficacy.Statistically even out of say three thousand candidates only six people might catch it.

No cases here but masks etc are compulsory. In the heat they are a real challenge especially the cloth variety. The trash from the disposable masks is overwhelming. I have a lovely collection including my favourite being a knock off Burberry design for $2. I read that the real thing sells for almost $200 !!!

 

 
1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

In their defence they just accelerated the phase 3 process and offered it on a voluntary basis to health care workers.The West like to criticize but in the circumstances it's an approach worth considering.

Reading some stuff on this the "good" thing about this virus is that because it is comparatively benign so too are the vaccines. (Nothing like the risks of injecting people with smallpox etc) The likelihood of side affects are low. Whether they work is the big question.

Interesting ethical debates on whether "challenge testing"should be allowed. This is where a vaccinated person is deliberately exposed to the virus. The problem with "normal'testing is that your chances of picking up the virus is around one in five hundred at worst even in the heavily exposed countries so you need massive numbers to determine its efficacy.Statistically even out of say three thousand candidates only six people might catch it.

No cases here but masks etc are compulsory. In the heat they are a real challenge especially the cloth variety. The trash from the disposable masks is overwhelming. I have a lovely collection including my favourite being a knock off Burberry design for $2. I read that the real thing sells for almost $200 !!!

 

Where ary you DJ? Asking for a friend. If it's more than 5 km from where I live I can't get there right now.

3 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

So you are happy that we all go back into Stage 3 or 4 lockdown every time there are a series of breakouts and our health and hospital systems can't manage the workload and they are getting covid.  Hospital wards close and fewer and fewer non covid procedures are carried out.  Shops close, schools close, restaurants close, no concerts, football, cinemas etc etc. 

I truly hope that you and your family do not get this wretched virus, are not one of the frontline workers or someone who will lose their job or lose their business because of the lockdowns. 

One way or another everyone suffers from outbreaks.

Won't happen?  Look at New Zealand.  No cases for 3 months then within a week there are a hundred cases and Auckland goes into lockdown.  Not sure they yet know how this 'patient zero' caught it.

Lockdowns will continue until there is widespread vaccination.

It isn't about protecting you.   Its about protecting everyone around you that you might infect.

Well Sweden may have been right all along. It will take until April/May next year to find out. 

How do we know there will ever be a vaccine ? A continuous state of lockdowns !!!!! That will never work.


20 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Where ary you DJ? Asking for a friend. If it's more than 5 km from where I live I can't get there right now.

Malaysia... usually spend 6 months of the year here travelling the world.

came here as usual in January for a trip to India and China and then Italy and Greece.... 

Managed India but ... well we know what happened.

Was planning to return in August but it's increasingly looking like sometime in 2021.

Adult kids have taken over the house in Melbourne so I just see the bills !! 

BTW...I have 500Mbs internet for $40 a month and they call Australia first world.

Here every place has temperature taking, scan in with the govt app and masks. Last week they had a massive crackdown and closed lots of places. Like most countries the economy is shot for this year.... International borders fully locked down but no interstate restrictions. States here have little power as the Federal Government has all the money.

 

 

21 minutes ago, dl4e said:

Well Sweden may have been right all along. It will take until April/May next year to find out. 

How do we know there will ever be a vaccine ? A continuous state of lockdowns !!!!! That will never work.

My point was if people are vaccinated everyone is safer and we won't need lock downs.

Can't see our governments going with the Swedish 'herd' immunity and we are very risk averse as our closed state borders demonstrate.  They also have low political tolerance for a 'normal' level of daily cases.  So if there is no vaccine they will need to think of something else.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

  • 2 weeks later...

Now that the fixture has been finalised, I thought I'd collate some data on the fixture.

This is very subjective and designed to maximise my argument that we've had one of the most unhelpful fixtures in 2020. I've looked at 4-day breaks, the number of different venues played at, the number of states/territories played in, the maximum number of games played at any one venue, and the number of games played at the same place as the previous week.

On each one of these metrics, we are the league's worst. Without exception.

We had the equal most four-day breaks. We played at the most venues, across the most states/territories. Every other club played at least four games at at least one venue this year: for us, the maximum is the 3 games we'll play at Metricon and the Gabba. And only three times this year did we play consecutive games in the same place (matched by Port and Sydney).

Before anyone starts: I do not believe our fixture is the reason we've struggled and are likely (albeit not certain) to miss finals. I do not believe the fixture is the reason we have no discernible game plan, or that TMac has regressed, or that we can't work out where to play Harmes, or why we dropped Fritsch into the backline inexplicably.

I am simply putting this here to discuss the fact that we've really had a sh*t time of it fixture-wise this year. When you see North Melbourne and the Dogs get almost half their entire season at one venue, or Sydney get through both compressed fixture periods without a single four-day break, or Collingwood getting to stay in Brisbane for so many weeks in a row, it makes you think how the AFL had so much flexibility to make this fixture as even as possible, yet didn't.

 
 

4-day breaks

Number of venues

Number of States & Territories

Max number of games any one venue

Games played at same venue as previous game

Adelaide

1

3

2

10 (Adelaide)

5

Brisbane

3

5

3

9 (Gabba)

7

Carlton

1

7

4

4 (Metricon, Gabba)

5

Collingwood

2

6

5

7 (Gabba)

8

Essendon

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

Fremantle

1

5

3

7 (Perth)

9

Geelong

2

8

5

4 (Metricon)

5

Gold Coast

2

7

5

9 (Metricon)

7

GWS

1

6

4

6 (Giants)

7

Hawthorn

1

8

5

5 (Adelaide)

7

Melbourne

3

9

6

3 (Metricon, Gabba)

3

North Melbourne

2

5

4

8 (Metricon)

6

Port Adelaide

1

3

2

7 (Adelaide)

3

Richmond

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

St Kilda

2

6

4

6 (Gabba)

6

Sydney

0

7

5

4 (SCG)

3

West Coast

2

3

2

7 (Perth)

6

Western Bulldogs

0

6

4

8 (Metricon)

8

10 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Now that the fixture has been finalised, I thought I'd collate some data on the fixture.

This is very subjective and designed to maximise my argument that we've had one of the most unhelpful fixtures in 2020. I've looked at 4-day breaks, the number of different venues played at, the number of states/territories played in, the maximum number of games played at any one venue, and the number of games played at the same place as the previous week.

On each one of these metrics, we are the league's worst. Without exception.

We had the equal most four-day breaks. We played at the most venues, across the most states/territories. Every other club played at least four games at at least one venue this year: for us, the maximum is the 3 games we'll play at Metricon and the Gabba. And only three times this year did we play consecutive games in the same place (matched by Port and Sydney).

Before anyone starts: I do not believe our fixture is the reason we've struggled and are likely (albeit not certain) to miss finals. I do not believe the fixture is the reason we have no discernible game plan, or that TMac has regressed, or that we can't work out where to play Harmes, or why we dropped Fritsch into the backline inexplicably.

I am simply putting this here to discuss the fact that we've really had a sh*t time of it fixture-wise this year. When you see North Melbourne and the Dogs get almost half their entire season at one venue, or Sydney get through both compressed fixture periods without a single four-day break, or Collingwood getting to stay in Brisbane for so many weeks in a row, it makes you think how the AFL had so much flexibility to make this fixture as even as possible, yet didn't.

 
 

4-day breaks

Number of venues

Number of States & Territories

Max number of games any one venue

Games played at same venue as previous game

Adelaide

1

3

2

10 (Adelaide)

5

Brisbane

3

5

3

9 (Gabba)

7

Carlton

1

7

4

4 (Metricon, Gabba)

5

Collingwood

2

6

5

7 (Gabba)

8

Essendon

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

Fremantle

1

5

3

7 (Perth)

9

Geelong

2

8

5

4 (Metricon)

5

Gold Coast

2

7

5

9 (Metricon)

7

GWS

1

6

4

6 (Giants)

7

Hawthorn

1

8

5

5 (Adelaide)

7

Melbourne

3

9

6

3 (Metricon, Gabba)

3

North Melbourne

2

5

4

8 (Metricon)

6

Port Adelaide

1

3

2

7 (Adelaide)

3

Richmond

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

St Kilda

2

6

4

6 (Gabba)

6

Sydney

0

7

5

4 (SCG)

3

West Coast

2

3

2

7 (Perth)

6

Western Bulldogs

0

6

4

8 (Metricon)

8

Great work titan. I’ve wondered about the metrics of this. 

27 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Now that the fixture has been finalised, I thought I'd collate some data on the fixture.

This is very subjective and designed to maximise my argument that we've had one of the most unhelpful fixtures in 2020. I've looked at 4-day breaks, the number of different venues played at, the number of states/territories played in, the maximum number of games played at any one venue, and the number of games played at the same place as the previous week.

On each one of these metrics, we are the league's worst. Without exception.

We had the equal most four-day breaks. We played at the most venues, across the most states/territories. Every other club played at least four games at at least one venue this year: for us, the maximum is the 3 games we'll play at Metricon and the Gabba. And only three times this year did we play consecutive games in the same place (matched by Port and Sydney).

Before anyone starts: I do not believe our fixture is the reason we've struggled and are likely (albeit not certain) to miss finals. I do not believe the fixture is the reason we have no discernible game plan, or that TMac has regressed, or that we can't work out where to play Harmes, or why we dropped Fritsch into the backline inexplicably.

I am simply putting this here to discuss the fact that we've really had a sh*t time of it fixture-wise this year. When you see North Melbourne and the Dogs get almost half their entire season at one venue, or Sydney get through both compressed fixture periods without a single four-day break, or Collingwood getting to stay in Brisbane for so many weeks in a row, it makes you think how the AFL had so much flexibility to make this fixture as even as possible, yet didn't.

 
 

4-day breaks

Number of venues

Number of States & Territories

Max number of games any one venue

Games played at same venue as previous game

Adelaide

1

3

2

10 (Adelaide)

5

Brisbane

3

5

3

9 (Gabba)

7

Carlton

1

7

4

4 (Metricon, Gabba)

5

Collingwood

2

6

5

7 (Gabba)

8

Essendon

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

Fremantle

1

5

3

7 (Perth)

9

Geelong

2

8

5

4 (Metricon)

5

Gold Coast

2

7

5

9 (Metricon)

7

GWS

1

6

4

6 (Giants)

7

Hawthorn

1

8

5

5 (Adelaide)

7

Melbourne

3

9

6

3 (Metricon, Gabba)

3

North Melbourne

2

5

4

8 (Metricon)

6

Port Adelaide

1

3

2

7 (Adelaide)

3

Richmond

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

St Kilda

2

6

4

6 (Gabba)

6

Sydney

0

7

5

4 (SCG)

3

West Coast

2

3

2

7 (Perth)

6

Western Bulldogs

0

6

4

8 (Metricon)

8

That is damning.

Id like to know what we’ve done to deserve this?  


Why is Stk Vs GWS on the Friday night? This could be a massive make or break game for so many teams. 
Another strange scheduling of the final round from the AFL

8 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Now that the fixture has been finalised, I thought I'd collate some data on the fixture.

This is very subjective and designed to maximise my argument that we've had one of the most unhelpful fixtures in 2020. I've looked at 4-day breaks, the number of different venues played at, the number of states/territories played in, the maximum number of games played at any one venue, and the number of games played at the same place as the previous week.

On each one of these metrics, we are the league's worst. Without exception.

We had the equal most four-day breaks. We played at the most venues, across the most states/territories. Every other club played at least four games at at least one venue this year: for us, the maximum is the 3 games we'll play at Metricon and the Gabba. And only three times this year did we play consecutive games in the same place (matched by Port and Sydney).

Before anyone starts: I do not believe our fixture is the reason we've struggled and are likely (albeit not certain) to miss finals. I do not believe the fixture is the reason we have no discernible game plan, or that TMac has regressed, or that we can't work out where to play Harmes, or why we dropped Fritsch into the backline inexplicably.

I am simply putting this here to discuss the fact that we've really had a sh*t time of it fixture-wise this year. When you see North Melbourne and the Dogs get almost half their entire season at one venue, or Sydney get through both compressed fixture periods without a single four-day break, or Collingwood getting to stay in Brisbane for so many weeks in a row, it makes you think how the AFL had so much flexibility to make this fixture as even as possible, yet didn't.

 
 

4-day breaks

Number of venues

Number of States & Territories

Max number of games any one venue

Games played at same venue as previous game

Adelaide

1

3

2

10 (Adelaide)

5

Brisbane

3

5

3

9 (Gabba)

7

Carlton

1

7

4

4 (Metricon, Gabba)

5

Collingwood

2

6

5

7 (Gabba)

8

Essendon

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

Fremantle

1

5

3

7 (Perth)

9

Geelong

2

8

5

4 (Metricon)

5

Gold Coast

2

7

5

9 (Metricon)

7

GWS

1

6

4

6 (Giants)

7

Hawthorn

1

8

5

5 (Adelaide)

7

Melbourne

3

9

6

3 (Metricon, Gabba)

3

North Melbourne

2

5

4

8 (Metricon)

6

Port Adelaide

1

3

2

7 (Adelaide)

3

Richmond

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

St Kilda

2

6

4

6 (Gabba)

6

Sydney

0

7

5

4 (SCG)

3

West Coast

2

3

2

7 (Perth)

6

Western Bulldogs

0

6

4

8 (Metricon)

8

Considering that off the back of last year's disaster we should've in theory been given a kinder draw we have definitely been shafted. 

There are more systematic issues within the team and the club that we need to fix before we'll be a contender but one would hope that next year we get a kinder draw to make up for this (though it's extremely unlikely).

8 new cases in Queensland.

If the AFL had any credibility and consistency they would move the grand final to Adelaide - TODAY!

They moved AFL games out of Victoria and NSW because of community transmission. 

15 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Now that the fixture has been finalised, I thought I'd collate some data on the fixture.

This is very subjective and designed to maximise my argument that we've had one of the most unhelpful fixtures in 2020. I've looked at 4-day breaks, the number of different venues played at, the number of states/territories played in, the maximum number of games played at any one venue, and the number of games played at the same place as the previous week.

On each one of these metrics, we are the league's worst. Without exception.

We had the equal most four-day breaks. We played at the most venues, across the most states/territories. Every other club played at least four games at at least one venue this year: for us, the maximum is the 3 games we'll play at Metricon and the Gabba. And only three times this year did we play consecutive games in the same place (matched by Port and Sydney).

Before anyone starts: I do not believe our fixture is the reason we've struggled and are likely (albeit not certain) to miss finals. I do not believe the fixture is the reason we have no discernible game plan, or that TMac has regressed, or that we can't work out where to play Harmes, or why we dropped Fritsch into the backline inexplicably.

I am simply putting this here to discuss the fact that we've really had a sh*t time of it fixture-wise this year. When you see North Melbourne and the Dogs get almost half their entire season at one venue, or Sydney get through both compressed fixture periods without a single four-day break, or Collingwood getting to stay in Brisbane for so many weeks in a row, it makes you think how the AFL had so much flexibility to make this fixture as even as possible, yet didn't.

 
 

4-day breaks

Number of venues

Number of States & Territories

Max number of games any one venue

Games played at same venue as previous game

Adelaide

1

3

2

10 (Adelaide)

5

Brisbane

3

5

3

9 (Gabba)

7

Carlton

1

7

4

4 (Metricon, Gabba)

5

Collingwood

2

6

5

7 (Gabba)

8

Essendon

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

Fremantle

1

5

3

7 (Perth)

9

Geelong

2

8

5

4 (Metricon)

5

Gold Coast

2

7

5

9 (Metricon)

7

GWS

1

6

4

6 (Giants)

7

Hawthorn

1

8

5

5 (Adelaide)

7

Melbourne

3

9

6

3 (Metricon, Gabba)

3

North Melbourne

2

5

4

8 (Metricon)

6

Port Adelaide

1

3

2

7 (Adelaide)

3

Richmond

1

7

5

6 (Metricon)

5

St Kilda

2

6

4

6 (Gabba)

6

Sydney

0

7

5

4 (SCG)

3

West Coast

2

3

2

7 (Perth)

6

Western Bulldogs

0

6

4

8 (Metricon)

8

I assume there was a consultation process with the clubs given the unique nature of covid fixturing. If there was then the club hasn’t fought its corner very well. Perhaps they thought with Burgess on board they could deal with it. There was a lot of big talk before the Port game about how the 4 day turnaround didn’t matter, they could handle it, no excuses, rah rah. 5 minutes into the game put paid to that pipe dream.

Chalk it down to another learning.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

      • Like
    • 191 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

      • Haha
    • 10 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

      • Haha
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Like
    • 468 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland