Jump to content

Featured Replies

12 minutes ago, Dee-lusional said:

Ā 

A team I would like to see.

Couldn't split Jets/ Pig.Ā 

Brown/LJ. Think LJ has had a tasteĀ and Brown would want to show Dons what they let slip

AVB/Gus. Think Gus plays best at centre/rover but clarrie is doing it betterĀ + Love AVB

Jones to be managed, Smith Out. TMac to be started down back. Weid to be left alone at FF. Milks & Fritt to hit up the leading targetsĀ 

Ā 

B

Jetta/PIG

May

Lever

HB

Rivers

T Mac

Salem

C

Langdon

Viney

Thomo

HF

Milks

Brown/LJ

Fritta

F

Hunt

Weid

Pickett

Ruck

Gawn

Clarrie

Tracs

I/C

AVB/Gus

Bennell

Hannon

ANB

Would not be against this, TMac really seems to have lost confidence in himself as a forward, perhaps a return to defense may help him. Play Weid as our number one FF target and give him that responsibility. Not as a second ruck or anything else, only play him as a forward. Brown vs LJ is definitely a tough one, experience vsĀ development. Plus some times players just find another gear against former clubs. On form I'd marginally give it to AvB, two games of low output and I don't really recall Gus doing aĀ lot in the pre-season either.

On the back up ruck side of things, Thomo has done that in the past at GWS. Just a thought.

Ā 
42 minutes ago, binman said:

I have to say there is fair dose of irony trading a defenderĀ that whilstĀ athletically gifted, strong and fast is not a natural footballer (and who it must be said is now a pretty good one) and is prone to havingĀ very costly brain fades.

Was more to it than that.

26 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

I know it's only a scratch match, but after reading the report from the club what about Weid and Brown in for Jackson and TMac?

Ā 

I agree with the Weid he deserves a go. WeĀ just needed a presence to help upĀ forward.

Ā  I would expectĀ a quickĀ  in KossiĀ  to come in and of all reports Vanders did well and is what we need a strong hard nosedĀ  bull.

I am not sorry to see OMac come in to replace J Smith who just does not cut it. I would have liked to see Petty instead of Omac however l am not sure if he is ready for aĀ return.Ā  4 changes for meĀ  LN.

 
Just now, nosoupforme said:

I agree with the Weid he deserves a go. WeĀ just needed a presence to help upĀ forward.

Ā  I would expectĀ a quickĀ  in KossiĀ  to come in and of all reports Vanders did well and is what we need a strong hard nosedĀ  bull.

I am not sorry to see OMac come in to replace J Smith who just does not cut it. I would have liked to see Petty instead of Omac however l am not sure if he is ready for aĀ return.Ā  4 changes for meĀ  LN.

Oh yeah, to be clear, my original changes in this thread were:

OUT: Jackson, Smith, Jones

IN: Weid, OMac, Kozzy

But I was adding in Brown for TMac on top after reading the scratch match report.

28 minutes ago, Dee-lusional said:

Sounds like JJ may be a chance after reading the pracie match reportĀ 

Maybe. But do we really need another inside mid, contested ball winner?

Brayshaw will end up being relegated to retrieving balls that get kicked into the empty stands.


12 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Was more to it than that.

I know bing, Twas a little joke by moi

57 minutes ago, binman said:

I have to say there is fair dose of irony trading a defenderĀ that whilstĀ athletically gifted, strong and fast is not a natural footballer (and who it must be said is now a pretty good one) and is prone to havingĀ very costly brain fades.

AndĀ replacing him down back with anĀ athletically gifted, strong and fast bloke who is not a natural footballer and on the evidence of one game prone toĀ having very costly brain fades.

Have we made the correct call on any of Howe, Dunn, Frost, May or Lever?Ā 

5 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

Have we made the correct call on any of Howe, Dunn, Frost, May or Lever?Ā 

Frost, May and Lever are still too early to tell.Ā  Howe wanted out so it wasn't as if we had a choice, and Dunn wasn't going anywhere under Roos.

Ā 

It just sounds super messy right now, reading through all of this I have no clue what our forward line is going to look like. I would just say bring in Kozzi and Weed for Jackson and Jones. it hurts to say Jones because we all love him but Nathan Jones was really ineffective against the Blues and Essendon are a lot quicker than the Blues. I just have no clue where to play Jones anymore. I'd say perhaps a HFF but there are a few more ahead of him now.Ā 

I also can't see how Jones is going to fair against Saints, Rich, GWS, Bris and Geel who are all super quick users of the ball. IĀ don't mean to out him singularly but we're already slow in Clarry, Gus, Harmes, Tomlinson, Salem and adding another slower, older player is just going to hurt us.Ā 

I wouldn't want to be Goody right now because this team is a total enigma.Ā 

In : Weed, Kozzy, LockhartĀ 

out: Smith, Jones/Milkshake, JacksonĀ 


1 hour ago, Fat Tony said:

Have we made the correct call on any of Howe, Dunn, Frost, May or Lever?Ā 

Oh yes. And you can add Watts and Hogan to that list as well.

3 hours ago, The Chazz said:

Logic says that;

Out - Jackson, Jones, Smith

In - Weid, Pickett, OMac or Hibberd (the latter two to be determined by match-ups)

Reality says that Goodwin won't drop Jones (emotional choice), Smith (loves him) or Jackson (won't drop him after a week), so I have NFI who will come out for Pickett, who will definitely come in. Ā Maybe he will drop ANB, given that he came in for Kossie before his brain fart.

Here is MFC PROBLEMS, Jones is nearly done and should be dropped. ANB Good first half but stuff all after that. T Mac absolutely shizzzen! Jackson Far too Raw but will have a future!

ALL FOURĀ SHOULD BE DROPPED IF WE HAD ANY GONADS.... BUT YOU KNOW THE REST

Which probably is why we have been Shizen for SOOOOOO BLOODY LONG

We do not like "Breaking Hearts"

Also, by the way, I expect Injectiondon to Win!!

Edited by picket fence

2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Oh yes. And you can add Watts and Hogan to that list as well.

Oi Weh. What is the point of all this post hoc ergo propter hoc vindictive nostalgia? The calls were made, some by the players, some by the powers that will always be. It's like saying if Australians had any sense they wouldn't have gone to Vietnam or Iraq, or, indeed to Gallipoli....Fact is, they did. It's history. deal with it.

13 minutes ago, dieter said:

Oi Weh. What is the point of all this post hoc ergo propter hoc vindictive nostalgia? The calls were made, some by the players, some by the powers that will always be. It's like saying if Australians had any sense they wouldn't have gone to Vietnam or Iraq, or, indeed to Gallipoli....Fact is, they did. It's history. deal with it.

I think you'll find bing was being facetious dieter....

1 hour ago, Wiseblood said:

Frost, May and Lever are still too early to tell.Ā  Howe wanted out so it wasn't as if we had a choice, and Dunn wasn't going anywhere under Roos.

That's all good and fair, but it looks so far that we have spent a lot of assets (picks and salary cap space) and gone backwards.


Just now, Fat Tony said:

That's all good and fair, but it looks so far that we have spent a lot of assets (picks and salary cap space) and gone backwards.

Time will tell.

After all, right now, we're only % out of the 8. ;)

I'll settle for AVB and Trac going through the MiddleĀ  (literally). Especially against this mob.

I would also tell our three pick ups, no more Mr Nice Guy. Just like They would have told three of ourĀ  players (if ever) going over to the Dark Side.

If someone gets a chance tell Watson to hand back his bloody Medal while he no doubt will be doing the Commentary, for the pox.

Ā 

It’s going to a blood bath - Essendons run will cut us to pieces.Ā 

36 minutes ago, willmoy said:

I'll settle for AVB and Trac going through the MiddleĀ  (literally). Especially against this mob.

I would also tell our three pick ups, no more Mr Nice Guy. Just like They would have told three of ourĀ  players (if ever) going over to the Dark Side.

If someone gets a chance tell Watson to hand back his bloody Medal while he no doubt will be doing the Commentary, for the pox.

Ā 

I think we have been playing Mr Nice Guy's for too long and time is right to find their mean streak when crossing the white line.

AVB is oneĀ  we certainly miss.Ā  Hoping he is a chance to help lead by example.

23 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Rubbish watch the game

Certainly was after half timeĀ 


3 hours ago, binman said:

Smith has to stay in. As i posted yesterday it is just plain stupid to bring a young player in and drop him straight away. Hate it. Bad for the player and sends the wrong message to other players, fans and the media. The only time i think it is ok is if they a complete shocker and there is concern another one will smash their confidence.Ā 

Besides he wasn't great but he was by far not our worst player.

Not convinced they should play him as a defender though. I read what Chaplin said about the reasons why they want to play him as a defender. Said it was becauseĀ  his athleticism gives us flexibility down back and he is less likely to get injured. I get the first part but the second part makes no sense to me. I would have thought he is more likely to get injured down back where he has to contest and tackle all day. But that is by the by.

The problem is it is evident he is not a natural footballer. He has low footy IQ.

In the old days they could put such a player down back. Tell them to stay glued to the hip ofĀ their direct opponentĀ and let the forward take them to the ball.

That doesn't work anymore and the defender has to understand systems, zones, body positioning, when to attack, when to stay down etc etc. Kids who have come through the TAC cup system struggle with all that let alone a fella who last played footy as 15 year old.

As a forward his chaos style works much better. See ball. Attack ball. SmashĀ packs. Bring the ball to ground. Take speccies. Ā He can be more instinctive and his athleticismĀ becomes an attacking weapon.Ā It is this combination of abilitiesĀ that gives me confidence he can be a player.Ā 

Of course forwards needs craft but i would argue playing forward is less challenging than back in terms of its testing your football IQ. And the risk reward is tipped the wrong way if you don't have that football IQ. Flying for the wrong ball and leaving a player out the backĀ is one example of this we saw on Saturday. But he can sort that.

More concerning is his kicking. Defenders are constantly put under pressure when kicking. Mistakes means goals. Natural defenders know better when and where to kick. And when not to. All that requires experience. Look at Rivers. Not only is heĀ Ā natural but he has played all his elite junior footy down back. And making things worse Smith is no more thanĀ an average field kick.

As a forward he isĀ really hard match up as you need a defender who can match his strength, pace and leap. They have to worry about him. Not vice versa. And like Tmac his kicking is actually really good from set shots.Ā 

I agree.Ā  I like SmithĀ as a forward - or at least half-forward.Ā  With Howe and Pedo departing, we lost our only real marking strengths. Especially now Tmac has suddenly started judging the ball flight about as well his brother.

The poor guy has played next to no footy in the last 3 years.Ā  We have to let him build confidence.Ā  It's pretty obvious he has more in his kit bag than Omac athletically, so we've got to give him a chance to learn the game and develop.

Footy IQ...Ā  Not really our strong suit is it..

Ā 

Ā 

Even though it was incredibly ugly, I struggle to justify changes after a win in the first game in months.

I would never have picked Jackson to play and feel the Weid has been very hard done by getting through his strongest preseason and then missed out to a kid straight out of high school.Ā 

Jackson showed a bit but had a couple small fumbles as expected. I would now feel equally disappointed if he was now dropped after 1 game.Ā 

Jackson’s selection leaves us stuck between a rock and a hard place asĀ I don’t ever agree with picking a player one week and dropping them the next. Jackson deserves at least one more match but I think we missed a trick in not giving the Weid first crack on a quick track under a closed roof. Could have been a great chance for him.

Also - not a selection change but a training andĀ mindset change. I have nothing against Lever/May/Smith working together in the backline but they played likeĀ selfish showboats with no cohesion at all.Ā 

OMac isn’t popular and I’m not a fan of selecting him mostĀ teams now play that boring defender to allow the intercept defenders to fly. Think Astbury, Roughead, Barrass, Howard etc. Them taking the best forward allows your others to rack up the intercepts and get some showtime.

The three boys we had on the weekend were embarrassing in there teamwork. Maybe even insecure and/or trying to hard to perform being early in the year but it was reallyĀ poor. Still, if they’re the three preferred then back yourself and give them another go.

So right now, Ā only ANB out for Picket. Nibbler did his thing but was always going to be in for the one game.

However Smith, Jones and TMac would want to show some serious improvement as I’d be looking at any excuse to get AVB and Lockhart back in whilst giving the Weid a few matches on the trot to decide if he’s worth keeping going forward.

My mail is that they really want AVBĀ in,Ā but after last week it is too hard to drop Hunt & they won’t drop Jones & Melksham after one poor game. Ā So,Ā I’m saying IN:Ā Kossie & Weid. OUT: Jackson, &Ā ANB.

Ā 

Ā 
4 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Player review from the scratch match. This is exactly what we want..

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/706162/the-reserves-practice-match-all-17-players-reviewed

Ā 

Um Yeah!!

ā€œSpargs moved around a little bit – he played high half-forward, on-ball and a little bit on the wing. The ball went over his head a bit because we were kicking it to the keys a fair bit, but he ran really good patterns and was really clean.ā€

1 hour ago, goodwindees said:

My mail is that they really want AVBĀ in,Ā but after last week it is too hard to drop Hunt & they won’t drop Jones & Melksham after one poor game. Ā So,Ā I’m saying IN:Ā Kossie & Weid. OUT: Jackson, &Ā ANB.

Ā 

And this .... Is and has been the problem with MFC! Shoulda been dropped, Woulda been dropped,Ā Coulda been dropped ....but CAN'T and WON'T BE...Ā Bah, no one should be safe!

RUTHLESSNESS and MFC are not compatible!!

Ā 

Edited by picket fence


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 53 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies