Jump to content

POLL 251 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you happy with this trade of picks with North Melbourne?

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

?North Melbourne? obviously think we are ?

They’re not wrong ?

 

Very happy. 8 will turn into 9 & 9 will get us Weightman. Take it to the bank.

Just now, Greendale said:

I think we've overpaid big time. Looking at the draft value index this trade only evens out if our first round pick is pick #34 next year, which is obviously impossible. Now the draft value index doesn't tell you anything about the individuals available or the overall draft quality, but it just feels like a desperation move. Take out the pick 50 and I'd feel like the trade is fairer.

I don't think the points matter in this one because of the compromised draft next year. Let's say Melbourne finish 7th, that's looking like being end-of-first under normal circumstances, and if the Club wasn't planning on using 50 this year, the swap is 26 and approx. 16/17/18 for 8 in a non-compromised draft.
I like it a lot!

 

In another thread, 'inanunda' stated that it was time for us to 'grow a pair'.  We just grew 'em!


1 minute ago, Grimes Times said:

Only taking 2 picks in this draft.

 

We have to use at least 3 don't we?

 
19 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Of course....

Every footy club has one...


1 minute ago, FireInTheBelly said:

What does 'wanted to move pick 3' mean exactly?

Splitting the pick I'm guessing.

1 minute ago, FireInTheBelly said:

What does 'wanted to move pick 3' mean exactly?

I think it means we wanted to split 3 into say 5 and 8 e.t.c


8 minutes ago, Greendale said:

I think we've overpaid big time. Looking at the draft value index this trade only evens out if our first round pick is pick #34 next year, which is obviously impossible. Now the draft value index doesn't tell you anything about the individuals available or the overall draft quality, but it just feels like a desperation move. Take out the pick 50 and I'd feel like the trade is fairer.

dvi is meaningless next year as the draft is completely compromised

not only are something like 15 of the current expected top 30-35 (depending on whose assessment you believe) set to be father-son and academy selections, but gc17 have freebies galore in pick 11, and darwin / academy access

Pick 50 this year is neither here nor there but it's a shame to lose the second round pick 

19 minutes ago, Jaded said:

No reason we would do this unless we had someone in mind for pick 8, or we are about to split pick 3.... this week just got interesting again. 
 

God I hope we get Papley with pick 8. 

Agree. Think this will force GWS to split now as we are in a better position to bid on Green as if they match then gives us more options at 8

I am more excited now than at any time during the season ....how sad is that!!

1 minute ago, FireInTheBelly said:

What does 'wanted to move pick 3' mean exactly?

were keen to split pick 3 but it sounds like we were only willing to do it for a really good deal. 

Not sure about our capacity to target a star in terms of cap room

I still think we might split it with the Giants for pick 6 and a player. 

if we could go to the draft with 6 and 8 and get say Finlayson, Caldwell, Daniels to go with it


4 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

 

Jon Ralph just making it up as he goes.

Not really.

I read that as:

- We are willing to part with pick 3, now that we have pick 8.

Hence, traded in a pick to give us both currency at trade table AND still have a top 10 pick.

Surely we're not going to the draft with both picks?

Now is the time to bite the bullet.

Pick 3 + player for Cameron. GWS nabs Greene. Win win.

7 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

 

Jon Ralph just making it up as he goes.

I immediately assumed the same as Ralph. Perhaps he's joined the dots with the Gun Forward thread.

Hi Jon ?

Edited by FireInTheBelly

 
9 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

I am more excited now than at any time during the season ....how sad is that!!

What!

You weren’t bouncing off the ceiling when we beat GC by a point?

 

Just now, Bring-Back-Powell said:

What!

You weren’t bouncing off the ceiling when we beat GC by a point?

 

I was bouncing off the ceiling but not from excitement.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 56 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Love
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 34 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Vomit
    • 546 replies