Jump to content

Tom Green (Drafted by GWS Giants)

Redleg
Redleg
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

IMO GWS wouldn’t have done a deal with the Crows if they didn’t have assurance from the dees that we won’t bid on Green. 

Why wouldn’t we pick him if he is what we are after is beyond me. We don’t need to help gws get better our job is for our team to get better. 

Last I looked we weren’t in the grand final this year.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    1 hour ago, Davos said:

    I was at that game. Walked away thinking he was the best player I saw. Put on a clinic.

    One game does not make a swallow Davos but he was very good.

    The game against SA however, ok and one of the Allies better players imv but not quite at the level of this one.

    I guess they are all young and going to have some major variations on the day.  Quality of opponents, recovery times etc.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    On 11/20/2019 at 10:35 PM, DemonOX said:

    IMO GWS wouldn’t have done a deal with the Crows if they didn’t have assurance from the dees that we won’t bid on Green. 

    Why wouldn’t we pick him if he is what we are after is beyond me. We don’t need to help gws get better our job is for our team to get better. 

    Last I looked we weren’t in the grand final this year.

    I think it's as simple as the Giants rate Jackson higher than Green, and they'd grab him if we did bid so they don't care. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    4 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

    I think it's as simple as the Giants rate Jackson higher than green, and they'd grab him if we did bid so they don't care. 

    Based on needs i would guess so PO.  They have plenty of mid field power.

  • Quote
    On 11/20/2019 at 9:44 AM, ProDee said:

    Blah blah blah

    You had to edit that post?

    Did you spell blah wrong?

  • Quote
    • Haha 4

    8 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

    You had to edit that post?

    Did you spell blah wrong?

    Jellyfish have survived for over 600 million years without a brain.

    There's hope for you yet, Junior.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 4
    13 hours ago, Watts the matter said:

    Is that the All Australian Matt Crouch you are talking of? If the range was Matt Crouch to Patrick Cripps he would be the first pick in the draft.

    If you think Green is Cripps then draft him, but if you think he is Matt Crouch and you think Jackson is Grundy then you go with Jackson. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    On 11/21/2019 at 10:37 AM, DeeSpencer said:

    If you think Green is Cripps then draft him, but if you think he is Matt Crouch and you think Jackson is Grundy then you go with Jackson. 

    I think you can’t lose with those 2. If we’re genuinely happy to get Green, which I think we should be, we bid.

    And we settle for Jackson if GWS matches. That way, we get 1 of the 2 players we want and we stop GWS from getting a second bite at the cherry.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     
    13 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

    I think you can’t lose with those 2. If we’re genuinely happy to get Green, which I think we should be, we bid.

    And we settle for Jackson if GWS matches. That way, we get 1 of the 2 players we want and we stop GWS from getting a second bite at the cherry.

    Getting the player we want more is the most important thing. GWS are going to be a good side with or without Green. In fact letting them get Green - who is unlikely to make them better in the next 2 years - and not having any future draft picks as well as a packed salary cap could work in our favour if we're proactive in grabbing one of their other young mids like a Caldwell/O'Halloran in next years trade period. The footy gods might smile back on us.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    • Author
    5 hours ago, KingDingAling said:

    We will bid on Green because he is a top 3 player in the draft.

    Only if we want him more than Jackson or anybody else.

  • Quote

    I think there is a very good chance the Giants wouldn't match the bid for Green so i guess it comes down to who we rate 3 in this draft. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    7 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

    I think there is a very good chance the Giants wouldn't match the bid for Green so i guess it comes down to who we rate 3 in this draft. 

    I would prefer Green to Jackson.

    Green could make a difference to our midfield rotations in his 1st year 

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    If GWS don't match the bid then I think his brother wont want to go the club either and will probably go into the draft, so if the brother is any good they wont want to burn bridges.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    5 minutes ago, durango said:

    If GWS don't match the bid then I think his brother wont want to go the club either and will probably go into the draft, so if the brother is any good they wont want to burn bridges.

    I'm not sure that theory holds water, can you name one instance where that has happened?

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    16 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

    I'm not sure that theory holds water, can you name one instance where that has happened?

    seeing as this is the first instance where two very talented brothers are both part of one of these farcical next generation academy thingoes i doubt very much it's ever happened

    green will be taken by gw$ no matter what

    i doubt we will nominate him, and thus gw$ will get two super players - it's an absolutely ridiculous situation

  • Quote
    8 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

    seeing as this is the first instance where two very talented brothers are both part of one of these farcical next generation academy thingoes i doubt very much it's ever happened

    green will be taken by gw$ no matter what

    i doubt we will nominate him, and thus gw$ will get two super players - it's an absolutely ridiculous situation

    A much more fair system would be academy bidding etc occurs before the draft as in teams can bid their picks for that player and if they do the Giants have an opportunity to match. but it means surrendering the picks to that value before the draft.

  • Quote

    I think that a bid at 3 by the MFC is a win/win situation since it will either force GWS to match it and if they don't then we get a player which is regarded by all recruiters as the next best player after the Sun's picks.

    As a club we are not there to make life for GWS easy in getting 2 guns not 1.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    I only think we should bid on Green if we think he’s best available, the idea of bidding on him to screw the Giants is foolish. 

    But at same time I think this will be the biggest pick of the night and will have a knock on effect on several teams weather GWS match or not. Ripple effect may  still be felt at 10 and might decide weather we trade that pick or not. Does anybody know if Giants would be allowed to split with another team and hold on to one pick even though they would have a point deficit ?Say we bid on Green, they split with say Port for 12&18 then use 12 on Green and 18 on another player.  

    If we decide not to pick Green and pick Jackson things might play out a bit more predictable. 

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    43 minutes ago, Colm said:

    I only think we should bid on Green if we think he’s best available, the idea of bidding on him to screw the Giants is foolish. 

    But at same time I think this will be the biggest pick of the night and will have a knock on effect on several teams weather GWS match or not. Ripple effect may  still be felt at 10 and might decide weather we trade that pick or not. Does anybody know if Giants would be allowed to split with another team and hold on to one pick even though they would have a point deficit ?Say we bid on Green, they split with say Port for 12&18 then use 12 on Green and 18 on another player.  

    If we decide not to pick Green and pick Jackson things might play out a bit more predictable. 

    They need to match the points. If we bid 3, they can swap to 12&18 but if the points are more than 12, then 18 drops back.

    Their other option is to trade for a later pick and a pick next year. That future pick is quarantined from matching the bid

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Whomever we bid on at 3, if there is not a match, many will perceive that we picked the lesser of the 2.

    Although a few will think a backroom deal was done.

    Coming last in consideration will be, we picked the player Melbourne need the most for the next few years. That's my punt.

    Edited by Damo
    a comma

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

    seeing as this is the first instance where two very talented brothers are both part of one of these farcical next generation academy thingoes i doubt very much it's ever happened

    green will be taken by gw$ no matter what

    i doubt we will nominate him, and thus gw$ will get two super players - it's an absolutely ridiculous situation

     

    To be fair, a similar thing eventuated in our favour when Frawley went to Hawthorn, with the absurd FA framework. 

  • Quote
    •  
    39 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

     

    To be fair, a similar thing eventuated in our favour when Frawley went to Hawthorn, with the absurd FA framework. 

    yep, but that's cos we were down so low so we got what he was valued at in terms of it being a pick after our first rounder, ergo pick 3

    also a farce, but not a ridiculous one like these nga players and discounts and points accumulation and rules on the run...

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 hours ago, Good Lord George said:

    They need to match the points. If we bid 3, they can swap to 12&18 but if the points are more than 12, then 18 drops back.

    Their other option is to trade for a later pick and a pick next year. That future pick is quarantined from matching the bid

    Thanks for that GLG. 

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Like
      • 136 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 261 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Geelong

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • 33 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Geelong

      Captain Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year in his quest to take out his 3rd trophy. He leads Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver who are in equal 2nd place followed by Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. You votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • 28 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Geelong

      The Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, falling to 0–4 after a more spirited showing against the Cats at Kardinia Park. Despite the improved effort, they went down by 39 points, and the road ahead is looking increasingly grim.

        • Like
      • 307 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All