Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

We're really scraping the bottom of the barrel if we're putting any credence into what Ricky Nixon has to say.  The bloke struggles to sit the right way on toilet seat.

nixon doesn't sit on toilet seats......toilet seats sit on nixon

 
1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

Has this been announced? Did I miss this?

Yes.

2 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Lol @praha

You're just posting whatever suits your doomsday, hyperbolic, OTT negative outlook.

No Brisbane in the frame = we can't prise him out of Collingwood. Then Brisbane show up = Brisbane has "gone past us".

If we were Brisbane you'd be critical of our 0-2 straight sets home finals exit. You'd note that we had no injuries all year (which probabilities suggest won't happen again in 2020), and you'd note that our fixture only had one repeat game against the top 8 and in our 9-game winning streak we only beat two top 8 sides, one of which was a faltering Geelong by 1 point.

Brisbane looked good this year. We looked just as good last year. Both young, both taken ages to make finals. 

Never mind the inaccuracy of calling Tomlinson a Frost replacement (by the way, if the media reports are true we'll be paying Tomlinson less than what Frost wants, and we get a draft pick out of trading Frost with no pick needed to get Tomlinson).

The first post strengthens the argument of the second.

1. I don't think he'll be leaving Collingwood. 

2. If he does and he choose Brisbane over us, it's an indictment.

How hard is that to read? Way to build your own narrative for a few forum likes. Didn't take you for a Gestapo lapdog.

 
4 minutes ago, praha said:

2. If he does and he choose Brisbane over us, it's an indictment.

 

Well it's not, but anyway..................

54 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Yes.

Pleasing news!

Source/link?

2 minutes ago, praha said:

The first post strengthens the argument of the second.

1. I don't think he'll be leaving Collingwood. 

2. If he does and he choose Brisbane over us, it's an indictment.

How hard is that to read? Way to build your own narrative for a few forum likes. Didn't take you for a Gestapo lapdog.

Says the poster who's developed a "doom spiral" narrative and takes every opportunity/topic to repeat it.

I just can't stand the way any piece of news is, for you, another example of the club being on its knees. Maybe you've just gone off a cliff in terms of your optimism/confidence in the club, and whilst that's understandable I find your arguments at times to be anything other than convincing.


Just now, Baghdad Bob said:

Well it's not, but anyway..................

Yep it really isn’t. Let’s not forget he’s not leaving a basket-case, he’s leaving Collingwood, the second biggest club in the land. He’s leaving for the club that offered him the best contract in terms of length and money. No indictment at all.

10 minutes ago, praha said:

The first post strengthens the argument of the second.

1. I don't think he'll be leaving Collingwood. 

2. If he does and he choose Brisbane over us, it's an indictment.

How hard is that to read? Way to build your own narrative for a few forum likes. Didn't take you for a Gestapo lapdog.

I'll try and avoid being a smart [censored].

But in my opinion it is a completely ridiculous assertion that if Elliot cthose lions over us it is in any way an indictment on us. 

Baghdad bob sums up the reasons why a couple of (his) posts back

Elliott is a RFA so Collingwood have the right to march a rivals offer and retain Elliott. There’s reports that Collingwood have increased their offer, are these perhaps incorrect given the above or are they attempting to get Elliott to re-sign before he accepts a rival teams contract? 

 
20 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Maybe you've just gone off a cliff in terms of your optimism/confidence in the club, and whilst that's understandable I find your arguments at times to be anything other than convincing.

Yes titan, I have. Great clubs don't lose the battles we lose. It's as simple as that. Very happy to be proven wrong by yourself and others. I mean that. Go back if you can be bothered and see my posts after our round 1 loss to Port. I was very much in battle with the likes of SWYL and a few others who constantly belittled the club at the time. This year has completely broken me. It arguably started after our loss to Hawthorn in round 4-5 2018 but 2019 was a huge burn for me and this club. I'm sorry but the burden of expectation and proof and risen for me now. 

14 minutes ago, binman said:

I'll try and avoid being a smart [censored].

But in my opinion it is a completely ridiculous assertion that if Elliot cthose lions over us it is in any way an indictment on us. 

Baghdad bob sums up the reasons why a couple of (his) posts back

you have to get into the mfcss spirit of things to understand


36 minutes ago, praha said:

The first post strengthens the argument of the second.

1. I don't think he'll be leaving Collingwood. 

2. If he does and he choose Brisbane over us, it's an indictment.

How hard is that to read? Way to build your own narrative for a few forum likes. Didn't take you for a Gestapo lapdog.

Godwin's Law?

2 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Elliott is a RFA so Collingwood have the right to march a rivals offer and retain Elliott. There’s reports that Collingwood have increased their offer, are these perhaps incorrect given the above or are they attempting to get Elliott to re-sign before he accepts a rival teams contract? 

What other reports are there other than Toot Toot Chicken Nixon?

10 minutes ago, Demonland said:

What other reports are there other than Toot Toot Chicken Nixon?

Apologies I should have said Nixon’s report. I suppose my point was that I don’t believe Collingwood would have increased their offer as they know Elliott is exploring his rights as a free agent.. Surely they’d hold off and see what offer he accepts then match it if they want to. Therefore I don’t believe Collingwood have increased their offer.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

4 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Apologies I should have said Nixon’s report. I suppose my point was that I don’t believe Collingwood would have increased their offer as they know Elliott is exploring his rights as a free agent.. Surely they’d hold off and see what offer he accepts then match it if they want to. Therefore I don’t believe Collingwood have increased their offer.

Not necessarily. Ideally Elliott wants to stay a Pie. Say the sticking point is just the 2 to 3 years. Collingwood might offer 3 at 500k per year and hope he accepts rather than have to match 3 (and maybe option for 4) at 600K per year. 

7 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Apologies I should have said Nixon’s report. I suppose my point was that I don’t believe Collingwood would have increased their offer as they know Elliott is exploring his rights as a free agent.. Surely they’d hold off and see what offer he accepts then match it if they want to. Therefore I don’t believe Collingwood have increased their offer.

Gut feel is he would stay at Collingwood for less (per year), and word gets around in AFL circles so Pies wouldn't be in the dark about his other offers as they come in. Would think they would up their offer as part of the negotiation, knowing that as long as it's not massively less he will want to stay. Then at the very end they can match the final offer if they wish.

 


20 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Elliott is a RFA so Collingwood have the right to march a rivals offer and retain Elliott. There’s reports that Collingwood have increased their offer, are these perhaps incorrect given the above or are they attempting to get Elliott to re-sign before he accepts a rival teams contract? 

Sorry ET but he is unrestricted according to afl.com So pies have to join the bidding if they want him

6 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Not necessarily. Ideally Elliott wants to stay a Pie. Say the sticking point is just the 2 to 3 years. Collingwood might offer 3 at 500k per year and hope he accepts rather than have to match 3 (and maybe option for 4) at 600K per year. 

I thought that could be the case and slightly covered off on that in my initial post.

So if an RFA announces they are going to explore free agency their current club can make them an offer anytime? I thought they had to wait and see if he accepted a rival clubs offer then match it.

Edit: Irrelevant now as grey wolf has brought to my attention Elliott is a UFA. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

3 minutes ago, grey wolf said:

Sorry ET but he is unrestricted according to afl.com So pies have to join the bidding if they want him

Yep correct, disregard my posts! 


9 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yep correct, disregard my posts! 

At the risk of being a fan boy I wont disregard all of your posts.

 
2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

From Elliott’s Instagram Story. 

 What can we divine?

* He’s in Queensland
* The sarong has alot of maroon in it

* There is red and blue in the Uno game

8FFACA57-5B39-49D8-A20A-FA97E637C104.jpeg

I think he’s gone from Pies judging by the cover of the UNO cards. I see numbers 2,3 and 4. No number 5, wild card is tricky to decipher though.

6 minutes ago, Demonland said:

From Elliott’s Instagram Story. 

 What can we divine?

* He’s in Queensland
* The sarong has alot of maroon in it

* There is red and blue in the Uno game

8FFACA57-5B39-49D8-A20A-FA97E637C104.jpeg

Hey @faultydet lives there..... should get him to head down to the lagoon and get in his ear.

Edited by ding


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

      • Thanks
    • 143 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

      • Thanks
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Thanks
    • 307 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland