Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, rpfc said:

Interesting how the biggest hypocrite on this site laments hypocrisy...

 

I would prefer Garlett to Hannan. Kent and Weideman have a great opportunity that didn't look likely a few weeks ago.

Spargo, Spargo, Spargo...

I think he is cooked. Evidently, the club doesn't agree. Huge stakes.

 

Garlett has been struggling.  I like Kent in particularly if he is in form. 

 
Just now, picket fence said:

Nup how can you play a League footballer .. THAT CANT KICK MORE THAN 35 M??

Ludicrous, Plus has NO PACE ….. on a big ground 

Ah Jeffy outa form no doubt , but in a crunch game still better than Spargo!

At least Spargo gives effort.  If Jeffy is out of form, he gives nothing 

1 minute ago, Demons11 said:

At least Spargo gives effort.  If Jeffy is out of form, he gives nothing 

Effort?? Class ALWAYS beats Effort! 

I rest my case!

 
12 minutes ago, layzie said:

Quite the inexperienced forward line really. Guys who are either raw KPP, have missed a lot of footy or very young. Not saying it’s bad but hope they know what they’re doing.

Chaos balls, she'll be right ?

1 minute ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Chaos balls, she'll be right ?

Club in panic mode!

Its called 

Bikini Mode!! 

"Cover ur Arse


1 minute ago, picket fence said:

Effort?? Class ALWAYS beats Effort! 

I rest my case!

Well, class + effort anyway. 

1 minute ago, drysdale demon said:

All games of football are won by the midfield.

As long as the "keepings-off" bit works as a consequence.  Let's face it,  the sport is now about creating a stoppage,  winning the stoppage,  controlling possession and then a having a shot at goal.  Controlling the possession is not our strength but invariably it is a strength. 

Turn the ball over and lose and you'll see a change of personnel.  In Goodwin's team,  a player can't run past a contest or turn the ball over as a primary weakness.  But if you're not great,  you have to play blokes who aren't that good. 

Spargo, with his weak kicking very lucky to stay in. 10 disposals at 60% efficiency, so 6 effective disposals.

JKH 14 disposals at 100% efficiency so 14 effective disposals, a big difference. He did some good things, can provide a good link, and was a long way from our worst (see ANB and or Garlett). I think he’s mostly done his bit since he came back in. He seems to be the selector’s whipping boy, given little leeway compared to others like Hannan and Garlett who until recently had to play a whole string of poor games before they got the chop. For a change, Garlett’s game v Sydney was so bad that in itself it brought about his omission.

Of JKH and Spargo, Spargo should have been given a rest, but I’d prefer either of them to Hannan. I think Hannan’s busy running style creates an impression that he’s fast, but then see the foot race with Lynden Dunne on Queen’s Birthday. Regarding tackling pressure, the last game the three of them played together was v the Dogs, Spargo 7 tackles, JKH 8, Hannan zero.

 
6 minutes ago, napster said:

Spargo, with his weak kicking very lucky to stay in. 10 disposals at 60% efficiency, so 6 effective disposals.

JKH 14 disposals at 100% efficiency so 14 effective disposals, a big difference. He did some good things, can provide a good link, and was a long way from our worst (see ANB and or Garlett). I think he’s mostly done his bit since he came back in. He seems to be the selector’s whipping boy, given little leeway compared to others like Hannan and Garlett who until recently had to play a whole string of poor games before they got the chop. For a change, Garlett’s game v Sydney was so bad that in itself it brought about his omission.

Of JKH and Spargo, Spargo should have been given a rest, but I’d prefer either of them to Hannan. I think Hannan’s busy running style creates an impression that he’s fast, but then see the foot race with Lynden Dunne on Queen’s Birthday. Regarding tackling pressure, the last game the three of them played together was v the Dogs, Spargo 7 tackles, JKH 8, Hannan zero.

Tend to agree, not happy with JKH’s omission. Spargo needs a rest, has struggled with tackles and kicking 30 m plus in the past 3 seasons plus. 

He will be a weapon in time but not this year. 

2 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Tend to agree, not happy with JKH’s omission. Spargo needs a rest, has struggled with tackles and kicking 30 m plus in the past 3 seasons plus. 

He will be a weapon in time but not this year. 

A weapon???

Slow, cant kick. Seriously??

Edited by picket fence


The Eagles sit where we sit ... average/above average and sometimes quite good.  The same argument could be put forward for another 8 sides.  There are no great teams although the Tigers are playing like a great team but I still see them as quite beatable.

We've got a great opportunity to beat a team who are where we are ... they are not a great team and Goodwin will be pressing that point home.  We have to start well and out-muscle them out of the middle - play to our strengths.  It's do-able.

WE  WILL GET flogged ! 

Not up to it football wise

37 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Effort?? Class ALWAYS beats Effort! 

I rest my case!

You can have all the talent in the world but if you don't apply it your just a waste of space. I'd prefer a talented player who works hard over just a hard worker. But if the more talented player isn't working hard you take the hard worker everytime. At least you know the hard working player will be accountable and play a role defensively. It's something you can never guarantee with Garlett, he picks and chooses when he puts in defensive effort. He has been like that his whole career. It was ok for us when we were a bottom side but it's not enough for a finals team. 

5 changes doesn't smack of desperation.  

With both Hunt and Hogan injured, and with Hibberd and Melksham returning, we were always going to make a few changes.  JKH has been okay without being good, while Garlett has only had one good game, and that was against arguably the worst opposition in the competition.

What I like is that we are still rewarding some good form.  Weideman and Kent have both been in very good form, with Kent giving us some pace and hardness across half forward, while Weideman ensures that McDonald isn't triple teamed all night and he can be the one to give Maxy a rest.  Hannan also gives us another medium sized marking forward who can cause match up headaches and give others a quick chop out through the middle of the ground.  Hibberd and Melksham speak for themselves and we are a far better side with them there.

These 5 changes are necessary and hardly the sign of desperation.  I'd argue that these 5 changes make us a better side, with the exception of Weideman for Hogan (although I'll back the Weid to step up and jag a few this week) and that can only be a good thing.

10 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Not up to it football wise

We are getting close. When we are "on" we dominate. We drop it regularly but I hope that as our list matures we will stop that. I've been entertained this year though alot of that comes with frustration and pain. I think we worry most of the other teams. Prefer the ability of this list to compete then others from recent years. Two more games to "enjoy", with a reasonable chance, that is in our own hands to make the final series. 


28 minutes ago, picket fence said:

A weapon???

Slow, cant kick. Seriously??

Not sure he is slow, how fast are you? But yes at this stage he has a lot to work on mainly strength in tackles and ability to kick more than 40 meters when he gets it. That is why I wanted him out of the side for a rest and maybe JKH in! What is your point? 

5 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Not sure he is slow, how fast are you? But yes at this stage he has a lot to work on mainly strength in tackles and ability to kick more than 40 meters when he gets it. That is why I wanted him out of the side for a rest and maybe JKH in! What is your point? 

Hes not slow, but he's not quick either.

But when i think of quickess i think of Hunt, Garlett, Dangerfield etc.

23 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Hes not slow, but he's not quick either.

But when i think of quickess i think of Hunt, Garlett, Dangerfield etc.

He gut runs enough for me, will be a good asset, but he is looking tired

Did not think we had a hope last week but this weeks side looks a lot better to me.

Dees to win by a couple.


These are exactly the changes I asked for earlier in this thread. If we lose, it’s my fault.

I reckon we’ve got this. Cancel your September holidays.

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

Yeah well have to be because

1 Has no pace 

2 And cant kick more the 30 M 

Still would have preferred Jeffy!

Watch this one backfire Spectacularly!

Yeah we will miss no tackles, no one percenters  and less than 10 possessions

Edited by chook fowler

2 hours ago, picket fence said:

 

Ah Jeffy outa form no doubt , but in a crunch game still better than Spargo!

When has Garlett ever performed in a crunch game?  Let me help you -  never.

Ill take Spargo all day, yeah he struggled last week and might be tiring as hes an 18 year old rookie,  but he will go when its his turn and hes hungry.

Edited by Petraccattack

 
3 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

I had a really nice coffee the other day and it was only $3.50, I couldn't believe it, I was expecting $3.80 or even $4, it is in Sydney after all. Does anyone know why the barista had it so low?

$3.50? In Sydney? And it was really nice? Get outta here! ?

5 hours ago, Jibroni said:

Were now  $2.15. Am I missing something?

... they reckon lightning never strikes de one club,  two weeks running.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 39 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 260 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies