Jump to content

Featured Replies

IN: Hibberd, Melksham, Kent

OUT: Pederson, Kennedy-Harris, Spargo 

We’ve really missed Hibberd down back as an organiser, interceptor and reliable, cool head.

Melkshams delivery inside 50, physicality, pace and accurate set shot will be essential in the next two weeks.

Kent is in form and kicking goals.  He has a mature body and demonstrated earlier in the season that his work-ethic is much better this year than in years gone by.

 

Spargo has a big future at the club and I’ve seen enough to suggest he has the skills, awareness and attitude to succeed at this level.  However at the moment, he looks fatigued and doesn’t yet have the strength and body to compete against the mature sides.

Pederson is an undersized ruck/ruck-rover- anywhere else at senior level and he is lost.  JKH simply doesn’t do enough for someone who doesn’t get a lot of the ball- he needs to hurt the opposition, but doesn’t have the weaponary at senior level.

The prospect of Hunt finding form is too much to ignore.  If he can start to get some run and carry and apply his old pressure and physicality, we’ll go to the next level.  He gets another week to find this form.

AVB is kicking goals and moving better each week.  I don’t blame him for Aliir’s dominance in the first half as none of the kicks were put anywhere near AVB’s advantage; most sailed meters over his head, straight to his opponent.

 
10 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

IN: Hibberd, Melksham, Kent

OUT: Pederson, Kennedy-Harris, Spargo 

We’ve really missed Hibberd down back as an organiser, interceptor and reliable, cool head.

Melkshams delivery inside 50, physicality, pace and accurate set shot will be essential in the next two weeks.

Kent is in form and kicking goals.  He has a mature body and demonstrated earlier in the season that his work-ethic is much better this year than in years gone by.

 

Spargo has a big future at the club and I’ve seen enough to suggest he has the skills, awareness and attitude to succeed at this level.  However at the moment, he looks fatigued and doesn’t yet have the strength and body to compete against the mature sides.

Pederson is an undersized ruck/ruck-rover- anywhere else at senior level and he is lost.  JKH simply doesn’t do enough for someone who doesn’t get a lot of the ball- he needs to hurt the opposition, but doesn’t have the weaponary at senior level.

The prospect of Hunt finding form is too much to ignore.  If he can start to get some run and carry and apply his old pressure and physicality, we’ll go to the next level.  He gets another week to find this form.

AVB is kicking goals and moving better each week.  I don’t blame him for Aliir’s dominance in the first half as none of the kicks were put anywhere near AVB’s advantage; most sailed meters over his head, straight to his opponent.

If one of Hibberd or Melksham had played, this website would be stagnant 

5 hours ago, Clint Bizkit said:

In the same way our record against top teams has been woeful, I’d love to know Hogan’s record against top and bottom teams.

Well said Clint. Please DL nerds provide stats on this.

My suspicion is that he has been abysmal in every one of our recent losses and very good in every one of our wins - downhill skier (smoker).

The two exceptions that I can recall are that he was pretty handy against Richmond at night - even snagging one from 50m out.

He also beat two players to get the key matchwinning handball against Adelaide three weeks ago - after a pretty quiet night mind you.

He made a great start to year, but has fallen away and his lack of second efforts are becoming the norm. I've said a few times that he probably needs a stint down back just to give him perspective and remind him how important it is to keep contesting. But now it seems he has a bit of a niggle anyway so there may be more to his loss of form.

One of my biggest disappointment yesterday was in third term on members wing and he and his opponent (think it was Aliir) were coming to fly for a mark and Lloyd was in front and backing in courageously and Hoges didn't even hammer Lloyd with a knee up fly - which would have been a fair tactic and the expected tactic.

 

 
13 hours ago, Docs Demons said:

Does it really matter. Other than Viney and Hibberd the rest of possible ins are not much better than the 6 or so we want out. I believe we have only 15 AFL players and the rest just good , ordinary VFL players. If our top 15 don't play at their best then we are done like today.

So you didn't spot Melky this season - he leads league in goal assists - a pretty handy stat I reckon.


Hunt and Pedersen ins this week didn't help us.  They looked like a compromise solution - Pedersen - what was his role?  Swing man because Max could not play his usual ruck minutes (only played 80%) and we wanted an extra tall forward to stretch Sydney's defence?  That's a pretty defensive approach.  And then Hunt to add pace for Smith because we're bring in slow Pedersen?  But I don't think my suggested alternatives, Wagner and one of Hannan/Kent would have made a difference on the day anyway.

Hibberd and Melksham definitely would and I'd have them in for Hunt and Pedersen.  If they had played I think we win against Sydney.

Then it will be fascinating to see what the football department think about the rest of the fringe: AVB, Spargo, Garlett, JKH.  FWIW I thought JKH was pretty good - composed and used it well and stuck his tackles.  Kent and Hannan are the alternatives again - one of them for Spargo IMO.

How many games do people think we have lost in the last two years at the selection table? I see it mentioned a fair bit, curious to peoples thoughts. 5-10?

Hunt has re-injured his ankle and in extreme doubt and Hogan will have his injured foot scanned. If fit, Melksham and Hibberd return

JKH is doing his role and was far from our worst on the weekend. Depending on injuries Hunt, Hogam out Pederson omitted for Melksham, Hibberd and Weid the only additional option is replace Spargo with Kent or Bugg (both in best for Casey) 

 
13 minutes ago, Deespicable said:

So you didn't spot Melky this season - he leads league in goal assists - a pretty handy stat I reckon.

OK I'll give you that one.

I do not understand how Hannan and Kent aren't in the team every week.. fair enough if they have like 4 bad weeks in a row but they are natural footballers and composed under pressure with great goal sense..Neal Bullen has to go he is a great flat track bully but has not much natural football awareness in him and butchers it too often... I really think we need to persist with Hunt but he is likely out with injury yes?? Also think Bugg is much more value to the team than JKH.. at least he will give us some aggro and spunk and produce at least as much as JKH at worst! the coaching staff obviously have darlings and Kent isn't one of them obviously because every time I see him play he is good for 1-2 goals a game at least and is dangerous? I think you have to persist with Jeffy Garlett.. dropping him back to VFL isn't going to do any good, he did try and ignite yesterday.. if that 2nd goal goes through no one is talking about him being dropped.. I think a mix of Kent/VANDERS/Hannan/Melksham/Garlett is a great smal fwd mix, one will always be on bench so have the other 4 on with TMAC and Hogan, l I love the guy but Pedo is only good as permanent ruck where he excelled last year when Gawn was out.. If Gawn needs a weeks rest to get him Cherry ripe for Gws I say do it... we only need to win one... top 4 is basically cooked as I think Hawks win out from here.... Pederson will more than hold his own vs Lycett/Vardy.. Spargo needs a spell he should of been rested with Hogan for gold coast. Not sure what to make of Wagner... probably won't come in with Hibberd due back... we don't often make 5 changes but i think the lineup will look so much better if we make the below changes. Get Gawn Cherry ripe for GWS... long travel surely means he is at even worse by the final round... play Pedo Ruck all day... even if Kennedy is back in i Think we go Frost on Darling, OMAC kennedy and Hibberd on the resting ruckman?

IN: Kent, Melksham, Hibberd,Hannan Bugg, (if hunt and maxy are injured)

out: Neal Bullen, Kennedy Harris, Spargo, Hunt,Gawn (if injured)

Edited by demon_fanatic


15 hours ago, scarlett said:

I think i have one.

Out

Night out at injured team mates engagement party.

In

Professional attitude and staying in.

(I dont know all the details, perhaps they went had dinner a couple of lemon squashes and went home, but not the best preparation)

I'm prepared to give our players the benefit of the doubt on this story.  If there's one area where our Club has come a long way in recent years, its professionalism.

8 minutes ago, MSFebey said:

How many games do people think we have lost in the last two years at the selection table? I see it mentioned a fair bit, curious to peoples thoughts. 5-10?

The only game you can categorically say we lost because of selection is the St Kilda game this year.

Frost instead of Petty and we win. 

That selection reeked of arrogance and lack of respect for the opposition, and it probably cost us finals. 

Edited by Jaded

16 hours ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

Out: Ped, Spargo, Hunt (inj) 

In: Hibberd, Melksham, Kent 

Seconded

JKH needs to go, unsighted all day apart from 1 kick to Hogan. It's like playing with a man down. Kent would offer so much more.

Edited by TheoX


17 minutes ago, Jaded said:

The only game you can categorically say we lost because of selection is the St Kilda game this year.

Frost instead of Petty and we win. 

That selection reeked of arrogance and lack of respect for the opposition, and it probably cost us finals. 

The midfield and forward line defend with any kind of intensity and Petty holds his first two intercept marks that he dropped and I bet he keeps going and plays a great game which we win by 10 goals. They also picked Petty a week late, he should've played against Port, after he had his best game in the VFL and had the match up on young Todd Marshall, and in turn freed up Joel Smith to shut down Westhoff, not the week after when he was quiet and probably doubting his confidence going in to the game. The whole backline was exposed by the poor up field pressure and space on the MCG. Lewis, Salem, Oscar were all shredded by the Saints that day not just Petty. It was a diabolical defensive performance that followed the diabolical offensive performance against Port. And it all stemmed from the overreaction to a bad day against the Pies and concern on how to replace Lever.

2 minutes ago, TheoX said:

JKH needs to go, unsighted all day apart from 1 kick to Hogan. It's like playing with a man down. Kent would offer so much more.

Hes played 5 games and I am pretty sure hes not had more than 15 touches in any of them.

This was a guy who had 25 possessions and kicked 3 goals in a win over Adelaide his debut season way back in 2015.

Hes made zero progress at AFL level and has even gone backwards.

32 minutes ago, Jaded said:

The only game you can categorically say we lost because of selection is the St Kilda game this year.

Frost instead of Petty and we win. 

That selection reeked of arrogance and lack of respect for the opposition, and it probably cost us finals. 

What about the Round 1 selection debacle?

Playing 3 key forwards?

No Frost when Lever went down, how many games?

There's a few in there, last year was worse.

Edited by MSFebey

Something to think about:

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-08-13/demon-hogan-set-for-scans-on-foot-injury

Hogan injury?:

  • Apparently went in to the game ok. 
  • Noticed a problem in the second quarter. 
  • Played out the match. 
  • Scans today. 
  • Hoping for the best.

He did well to play out the match - no wonder he couldn't kick straight or very far.

Based on prior week reports he was carrying some sort of injury anyway. 

And,

"Ruckman Max Gawn was one of several players who arrived for recovery, admitting he had completed extra rehab overnight as he battles a lingering calf complaint".

"Defender Jayden Hunt was also sent for scans after he re-injured the same right ankle he damaged while playing in the VFL in June".  

Do we have anyone that can ruck!  Did someone say we have good depth?  Maybe but is it in the right places.

Selections this week may be a case of 'rob Peter, to pay Paul'!

10 minutes ago, TheoX said:

JKH needs to go, unsighted all day apart from 1 kick to Hogan. It's like playing with a man down.

14 disposals at 100% efficiency, ran hard all day, mostly nailed his tackles, wasn't beaten in too many contests, was quiet in the 2nd and 3rd - guess what wing/flankers often are - but was one of the better players in the last term.

 


26 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Something to think about:

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-08-13/demon-hogan-set-for-scans-on-foot-injury

Hogan injury?:

  • Apparently went in to the game ok. 
  • Noticed a problem in the second quarter. 
  • Played out the match. 
  • Scans today. 
  • Hoping for the best.

He did well to play out the match - no wonder he couldn't kick straight or very far.

Based on prior week reports he was carrying some sort of injury anyway. 

And,

"Ruckman Max Gawn was one of several players who arrived for recovery, admitting he had completed extra rehab overnight as he battles a lingering calf complaint".

"Defender Jayden Hunt was also sent for scans after he re-injured the same right ankle he damaged while playing in the VFL in June".  

Do we have anyone that can ruck!  Did someone say we have good depth?  Maybe but is it in the right places.

Selections this week may be a case of 'rob Peter, to pay Paul'!

Hogan with a foot injury? Great, we all know how that goes at Melbourne. 

29 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Something to think about:

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-08-13/demon-hogan-set-for-scans-on-foot-injury

Hogan injury?:

  • Apparently went in to the game ok. 
  • Noticed a problem in the second quarter. 
  • Played out the match. 
  • Scans today. 
  • Hoping for the best.

He did well to play out the match - no wonder he couldn't kick straight or very far.

Based on prior week reports he was carrying some sort of injury anyway. 

And,

"Ruckman Max Gawn was one of several players who arrived for recovery, admitting he had completed extra rehab overnight as he battles a lingering calf complaint".

"Defender Jayden Hunt was also sent for scans after he re-injured the same right ankle he damaged while playing in the VFL in June".  

Do we have anyone that can ruck!  Did someone say we have good depth?  Maybe but is it in the right places.

Selections this week may be a case of 'rob Peter, to pay Paul'!

Time for the Weed to step up?

7 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Hogan with a foot injury? Great, we all know how that goes at Melbourne. 

Shame that Weideman isn't coming along as we had all hoped.  Talls take longer than other plalyres but most of the other 'Talls' in his draft year have made or starting to make an impact.  Even McKay (Carlton) and Francis (Ess) are getting regular games. 

So I'm getting a bit worried about whether he will get there to replace McD or Hogan when needed.

Edit: Just saw 'chook fowler's' post on Weideman.  Totally agree but he doesn't seem ready.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 
3 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

FWIW I thought JKH was pretty good - composed and used it well and stuck his tackles.  Kent and Hannan are the alternatives again - one of them for Spargo IMO. 

Interesting. I reckon I'm normally on the same page as you but JKH made me want to vomit.

 

3 hours ago, Jaded said:

The only game you can categorically say we lost because of selection is the St Kilda game this year.

Frost instead of Petty and we win. 

That selection reeked of arrogance and lack of respect for the opposition, and it probably cost us finals. 

If we'd defeated St Kilda we would be a lock for the top eight ATM (unless the Cats made a gain of 13+% on us in the last two weeks).


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 17 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies