Jump to content

Featured Replies

Norf. Is Jay Clark taking the [censored]? 

 

I hope Gaff signs at North. We need to save our $$$ for Josh Kelly next year. Move some pieces around this year and make some room. Trade Tyson, delist others who aren't needed, retire Lewis, Vince and Jones within the next year and make some room for Kelly. 

 
7 hours ago, demonstone said:

The cretins on Bomberblitz reckon they've got him, and they always seem to have the good dope.

 

7 hours ago, MSFebey said:

Worsfold connection perhaps?

Are you referring to the player Gaff, or to the good dope?


10 minutes ago, monoccular said:

 

Are you referring to the player Gaff, or to the good dope?

The cook.... I mean chemist 

I don’t get it, if they don’t come to us, I’d much rather big name free agents go to clubs like ours who have been down for some time in North, Saints and Gold Coast. 

How sh it is it seeing them go to Geelong, Hawks, Swans or especially the drug cheats. 

7 hours ago, Megatron said:

Why would we need to give them anything? Isn’t he a free agent?

minor details mega.

 

My guess is the media are saying Norf based on the size of the offer. He doesn't have to accept the highest one.

11 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

If he does go to Nought he will be universally loathed by all clubs...

If he goes to Nought ..... he'll be good for nothing......


Doesn't a Brayshaw run North ???

  • Author
13 hours ago, Robot Devil said:

Gaff to North has a lot of symmetry with the Judd to Carlton scenario. 

WC player returning to Melbourne on big dollars to play in a team that achieves SFA until he retires (and even then they still suck).  

You could insert the MFC here and your post would still have some merit.

If Gaff doesn't end up a Demon he's going to be labelled a mercenary by most supporters.

So if NO GAFF, what's plan B? Ed Langdon isn't the answer. We are definitely chasing at least 1 A grader, possibly 2 according to Mahoney earlier in the year.

13 hours ago, KingDingAling said:

I hope Gaff signs at North. We need to save our $$$ for Josh Kelly next year. Move some pieces around this year and make some room. Trade Tyson, delist others who aren't needed, retire Lewis, Vince and Jones within the next year and make some room for Kelly. 

This is something I can really get behind, unfortunately I've never heard Kelly linked once with us not even a whimper of speculation. Just seems like wishful thinking at this stage :(


5 minutes ago, johndemonic said:

Does anyone have an approximation on how much of an offer we would have actually been able to put forward?

Is there actually any proof out there that we actually have? Or even interested in Gaff of late?

I for the life of me can not see why anyone would ever want step foot into North Melbourne.

Most bland and boring football club going around! They rarely attract big crowds, they have a coach who is nothing but a A Grade Phlog, they have no brand and stand for nothing!

Yet we hear guys like Gaff and Polec are certain land at this irrelevant club?

Money does talk hey.

Edited by dazzledavey36

4 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I for the life of me can not see why anyone would ever want step foot into North Melbourne.

Most bland and boring football club going around! They rarely attract big crowds, they have a coach who is nothing but a A Grade Phlog, they have no brand and stand for nothing!

Yet we hear guys like Gaff and Polec are certain land at this irrelevant club?

Money does talk hey.

Off topic, but who's the better coach, Chris or Brad?

31 minutes ago, johndemonic said:

Does anyone have an approximation on how much of an offer we would have actually been able to put forward?

Reports are WCE have offered $850k and North are offering $1.m+

  • Given club comments that we have the sal cap for 2 A graders we could offer somewhere in that range.  
  • An offer needs to be one that WCE won't be able to 'virtually' match (that would allow them to force a trade ala Dangerfield).
  • The club narrative has been about a balance across player payments.  So even tho we may have the sal cap we may not be prepared to upset that balance and risk existing players being offside or risk not being able to afford our players coming out of contract next year (s).   

Hopefully, we have someone else in the pipeline if we miss Gaff.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


I posted a few days back that the North offer is longer at seven years and is worth almost $2M more. The only way he would come to Melbourne is on the hope that he would be able to make up the difference on his next contract.

Not much hope.

3 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Reports are WCE have offered $850k and North are offering $1.m+

  • Given club comments that we have the sal cap for 2 A graders we could offer somewhere in that range.  
  • An offer needs to be one that WCE won't be able to 'virtually' match (that would allow them to force a trade ala Dangerfield).
  • The club narrative has been about a balance across player payments.  So even tho we may have the sal cap we may not be prepared to upset that balance and risk existing players being offside or risk not being able to afford our players coming out of contract next year (s).   

Hopefully, we have someone else in the pipeline if we miss Gaff.

Hard to see anyone around that we would not have to trade for. Big decisions to be made

Given where our list is at, one or two 'A graders' shy of where we want to be, and knowing:

  • We have seen considerable development in a number of players this year like Harmes, Salem etc.
  • Spargo and Fritsch have had immediate impact
  • Oscar Baker is developing at Casey, and could be an outside ball hero for us with the right development.
  • We have some structural holes (back up ruck) that are screaming out for attention - will Bradtke be this??  How far away??
  • We have some players with large unfulfilled potential (Trac for example, Getting Viney on the park, Getting more from Hogan, etc etc)
  • A few players are probably ready to be retired, or to shift back to Casey type roles

Gaff looks like a good get, but do we want to join the bargain shoppers on this one?  Somehow I doubt it.  We make a reasonable offer regardless what North offer and stick to it.  Our big get was Jake Lever last year.  I don't know who else we would want that is available, and unless we are going to 'wiggle someone loose', we may have to give up more than we want to so that we can get what we want.

 

Has Lynch actually signed anything ?

  • Author
12 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

Given where our list is at, one or two 'A graders' shy of where we want to be, and knowing:

  • We have seen considerable development in a number of players this year like Harmes, Salem etc.
  • Spargo and Fritsch have had immediate impact
  • Oscar Baker is developing at Casey, and could be an outside ball hero for us with the right development.
  • We have some structural holes (back up ruck) that are screaming out for attention - will Bradtke be this??  How far away??
  • We have some players with large unfulfilled potential (Trac for example, Getting Viney on the park, Getting more from Hogan, etc etc)
  • A few players are probably ready to be retired, or to shift back to Casey type roles

Gaff looks like a good get, but do we want to join the bargain shoppers on this one?  Somehow I doubt it.  We make a reasonable offer regardless what North offer and stick to it.  Our big get was Jake Lever last year.  I don't know who else we would want that is available, and unless we are going to 'wiggle someone loose', we may have to give up more than we want to so that we can get what we want.

It's the free agent status that makes it logical to chase Gaff. Your points above are all valid but we have an opportunity to add a proven A grade mid with 170+ games to the team who is in their prime.

Stuff the waiting and hypotheticals based around our current list... Let's jack our team full of more stars while we can.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 23 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 59 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 21 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Like
    • 245 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Haha
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland