Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Yeah nah.

I’d be okay with $900K a year for 4 years with the knowledge you’re probably going to play in Grand Finals.

Eagles offered him 6 years at $850k a year and North 7 years at $1.2m a year.

If we were in the game, we would have to offer at least 6 years at $1m a year. That would be a $2.4m difference or about $1.2m after Tax give or take.

 
1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Eagles offered him 6 years at $850k a year and North 7 years at $1.2m a year.

If we were in the game, we would have to offer at least 6 years at $1m a year. That would be a $2.4m difference or about $1.2m after Tax give or take.

only if you really truly believed the above figures. i reckon they are inflated for the usual reasons

53 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Yeah nah.

I’d be okay with $900K a year for 4 years with the knowledge you’re probably going to play in Grand Finals.

Football career is short.

The question is $3-3.5M > premiership (Assuming North does not win one in that time and we do)

 
4 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

They (North) have an ordinary list and overachieved finishing 9th. They won't make the finals they should be a bottom of the ladder club even with Gaff. Gaff wants to play finals your guaranteed that with Melbourne not with North.

Neither of those are fact or necessarily true.

4 hours ago, stevethemanjordan said:

I'm really not sure why posters are so convinced Gaff is off to North.

Polec is about to go there on enormous money so I find it extremely difficult to believe North would pay another bucket-load to a similar outside running player? It really doesn't make any sense to me from a list management pov.

Not that it means much, but I happened to bump into Gaff last week playing golf at Camberwell. I had a chat to him and told him I hoped to see him running around in our colours next year, to which he responded; "I've got a bit to think about over the next few weeks."

My feeling is that we're still very much in the frame. My brother played school footy with him and has said he's a very honest kid who was a big dees fan growing up as most are aware. His father hasn't been well either which is obviously a massive factor in his decision.

Players go home to play at their club of choice sometimes even if it's for less money. Jeremy Howe for instance took less to go to Collingwood over the Gold Coast to play under Buckley who was his favourite player as a kid.

I'm still confident.

 

I’m quietly confident too, but I’m not really sure why. I don’t know him, and what I’ve been told is that the club itself expects him to go to North if he comes back to VIC. We shall see.


2 hours ago, Redleg said:

Eagles offered him 6 years at $850k a year and North 7 years at $1.2m a year.

If we were in the game, we would have to offer at least 6 years at $1m a year. That would be a $2.4m difference or about $1.2m after Tax give or take.

Our initial offer was 7 years, before he had an amazing season & pushed his price up. I’m told our offer is the same as West Coast’s, not sure if that extends to the length of the deal.

His dad's health issues may have been know and stressing Gaff when he had the rare brain snap.  So his dad and family may be the clincher to bring him back.   

Then Dees vs North?  Surely, its a no-brainer:  play for Goodwin or Mr Sourpuss Scott!! 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

4 hours ago, stevethemanjordan said:

My brother played school footy with him and has said he's a very honest kid who was a big dees fan growing up as most are aware. His father hasn't been well either which is obviously a massive factor in his decision.

 

Does that mean your brother was a Carey boy?

If so does that also mean you were a Carey boy as well?

 
4 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

He was, I wasn't. 

Would have been a great time to be playing for the Carey 1sts.


I'm surprised so many are confident.

From everything being reported, and there's usually smoke when there's this much fire, Gaff will either stay or go to North for the dollars.

I suspect North.  I hold zero hope he'll come to Melbourne.

And with the elevation in form of both Harmes and Brayshaw I'm far less eager than I was.

On 8/27/2018 at 9:31 PM, jumbo returns said:

'Melbourne are out of the running for Gaff'

Tom Morris - OTC tonight

Tom Morris is an attention seeker and average journalist 

8 minutes ago, chookrat said:

Tom Morris is an attention seeker and average journalist 

And his head is disproportionately large.

Im about as convinced as can be that this ship has sailed.

Can the super confident in getting Gaff people please explain how we will do this instead of constantly exhaling hot air?


20 minutes ago, Wolfturdo said:

Can the super confident in getting Gaff people please explain how we will do this instead of constantly exhaling hot air?

Geez man I don’t know, it’s late!

3 facts:

1. Gaff is considering his future

2. North will offer big money

3. Tom Morris is a total charlatan 

13 hours ago, ProDee said:

I'm surprised so many are confident.

From everything being reported, and there's usually smoke when there's this much fire, Gaff will either stay or go to North for the dollars.

I suspect North.  I hold zero hope he'll come to Melbourne.

And with the elevation in form of both Harmes and Brayshaw I'm far less eager than I was.

I think it comes down to a sheer lack of respect for North. Why would anyone want to go there? And I just feel that Gaff is about more than money.

10 hours ago, Wolfturdo said:

Can the super confident in getting Gaff people please explain how we will do this instead of constantly exhaling hot air?

- He is a Demon at heart! 

- The Dees have been into him for quite awhile.

- He gets to play in the big games at the G. Anzac eve, Queens Birthday, Grand Finals lol...

- He realisers the extra money North are throwing around is going to be eaten up by the tax man. And 1/2 of it is being paid in fake $50 notes... 

- He doesn’t want to be asked by North in 2 years time to take a pay cut because they need to find more money to recruit other players. 1.2M surely wouldn’t sit too well with some of the North playing group. They might as swell drive him to games in the Pope mobile. 

If the reported figures are correct, or in the ball park, you can’t blame the guy if he goes to North. 400k per season is a huge difference. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

9 minutes ago, Dee tention said:

- He is a Demon at heart! 

- The Dees have been into him for quite awhile.

- He gets to play in the big games at the G. Anzac eve, Queens Birthday, Grand Finals lol...

- He realisers the extra money North are throwing around is going to be eaten up by the tax man. And 1/2 of it is being paid in fake $50 notes... 

- He doesn’t want to be asked by North in 2 years time to take a pay cut because they need to find more money to recruit other players. 1.2M surely wouldn’t sit too well with some of the North playing group. They might as swell drive him to games in the Pope mobile. 

This is a line that should be conveyed to Gaff at every opportunity.

You can near on bet that it will happen at some stage.


3 hours ago, Mach5 said:

I think it comes down to a sheer lack of respect for North. Why would anyone want to go there? And I just feel that Gaff is about more than money.

For me it's the chance to run out at the G most weeks compared to Etihad.  

When journalists say that Melbourne have given up on getting Gaff I tend to believe them.  There are some things clubs won't let out, but others they do.  In this instance I see no reason to doubt these reports.  Sometimes journos guess, or put two and two together, and on other occasions clubs are frank, as I'm sure we have been.  You can tell by the definite nature of reporters saying Melbourne don't expect to be landing Gaff.  It was very different to the commentary around Lever last year, or Hibberd prior to that.  I'm virtually certain Gaff won't be coming to Melbourne.

Now I'll have dolts cite all the times journos get it wrong as though that has some sort of relevance to what I just said.  

Seems unlikely Gaff will be a Dee next year. So what are our options then?

Seems to be a bit of chatter about Dayne Beams.

Edited by Moonshadow

2 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Seems unlikely Gaff will be a Dee next year. So what are our options then?

Seems to be a bit of chatter about Dayne Beams.

Wants to go back to Collingwood is the word going around.

 
15 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Seems unlikely Gaff will be a Dee next year. So what are our options then?

Seems to be a bit of chatter about Dayne Beams.

According to someone at Brisbane (can’t remember who) they reckon he’ll see out his contract before coming back to Victoria. I believe he still has two years left. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

11 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

According to someone at Brisbane (can’t remember who) they reckon he’ll see out his contract before coming back to Victoria. I believe he still has two years left. 

The AGe Real Footy Podcast indicated he was going to play out at Brisbane then head home


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 52 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies