6: Jones

5 : Petracca

4: Oliver

3: Jetta

2:Watts

1:Pedersen

6 Jones 

5 petracca

4 Watts

3 Tyson 

2 O Mac

1 pedersen

 

6: petracca 

5: watts 

4: jones 

3: hunt 

2: Tyson

1: Pedo

6. Petracca 

5. Jones

4. Oliver

3. Hunt

2. Watts

1. O McDonald

3 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

6. Jones 

5. Petracca

4. Viney

3. Tmac

2. Oliver

1. Watts

Also good solid efforts by Hannan, Tyson, and Nibler.

Ps forgot Omac couple of bad turnovers early but had a decent game after. The Omac haters will just focus on the turnovers but he wasn't Robinson Crusoe there

Well said re: OMac  

6. Petracca

5. Jones

4. Watts

3. Tyson

2. Pedo

1. Hibberd

Worthy mentions to the two Mac's, Viney, Oliver and Hunt - if only he nailed that on the run shot on goal in Q4!

Petracca

watts 

O Mac

Tyson

Jones

Hibberd

6 - Jones
5 - Petracca
4 - Hibberd
3 - Oliver
2 - Watts
1 - Hunt

6 Jones

5 Petracca

4 Hunt

3 Tyson

2 Watts

1 Pedersen

6 - Petracca

5 - Jones

4 - Watts

3 - Oliver

2 - Hibberd

1 - Tyson

Hunt unlucky.

Special mention to Oscar. More of that, please.

Edited June 12, 20178 yr by Scythe

6 - Petracca

5 - Jones

4 - Watts

3 - Hibberd

2 - Tyson 

1 - Oliver

Apologies to Hunt, Salem, OMac.

Petracca and Watts the high votes for match winning efforts. Jones was probably for all 4 qtrs same with Hibbo.

6 Jones

5 Petracca

4 Oliver

3 Watts

2 Hibberd

1 Viney

6. Jones

5. Petracca

4. Watts

3. Hibberd

2. Tyson

1. Oliver

 

Nathan Jones is making a run at Clarrie's lead.

108. Clayton Oliver
92. Nathan Jones
63. Jack Watts
61. Michael Hibberd               
44. Jack Viney
40. Jeff Garlett
39. Christian Petracca
37. Jayden Hunt
23. Jordan Lewis
21. Dom Tyson
18. Sam Frost
17. Tom McDonald Christian Salem        
15. Neville Jetta Cam Pedersen          
14. Mitch Hannan                                 
11. Max Gawn                                                  
9. Bernie Vince          
7. Jake Melksham Alex Neal-Bullen
6. Jesse Hogan
5. Dean Kent Oscar McDonald Billy Stretch                 
1. James Harmes

 

6. Jones

5. Oliver

4. Petracca

3. Hunt

2. Salem

1. Hibberd

6. Petracca

5. Jones

4. Watts

3. Oliver

2. Hibberd

1. Salem 

17 hours ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

6. Jones 

5. Petracca

4. Hunt 

3. Watts 

2. Jetta 

1. Oliver 

Post view of replay I would have changed these to 

6. Jones

5. Petracca

4. Hunt

3. Salem

2. Watts

1. Oliver

6 - Jones

5- Petracca

4- Watts

3- Oliver

2- OMac

1- Hunt

Another 4-5 deserved a vote....!!!!

Surprised so many have rated Watts' game over Oliver's.

We were getting belted in the clearances in the first half and Oliver was one of the keys for us in getting the ascendancy in that area in the second half.

His last quarter was fantastic. With enormous pressure, fatigued bodies and a greasy ball, he was one of the few who could cleanly pick it up off the deck in traffic and get the ball going forward for us.

As for Watts, I thought it was more of a "moments" game from him, especially the last quarter goal and then the touched ball on the line. He was also on Howe in the first half and was beaten. I'm not saying he didn't contribute, he had a decent game and did well to come back from an early injury. And no doubt his class in the key moment in the last quarter was telling.

But for me it was the turnaround in the contest and at the stoppages (and then the run from guys like Hunt) that turned the game around and Oliver was a big part of this.

6 Petracca

5 Jones

4 Oliver

3 Watts

2 Hibberd

1 Garlett

Unlucky: Jetta, O.McDonald, Pedersen

25 minutes ago, Scoop Junior said:

Surprised so many have rated Watts' game over Oliver's.

We were getting belted in the clearances in the first half and Oliver was one of the keys for us in getting the ascendancy in that area in the second half.

His last quarter was fantastic. With enormous pressure, fatigued bodies and a greasy ball, he was one of the few who could cleanly pick it up off the deck in traffic and get the ball going forward for us.

As for Watts, I thought it was more of a "moments" game from him, especially the last quarter goal and then the touched ball on the line. He was also on Howe in the first half and was beaten. I'm not saying he didn't contribute, he had a decent game and did well to come back from an early injury. And no doubt his class in the key moment in the last quarter was telling.

But for me it was the turnaround in the contest and at the stoppages (and then the run from guys like Hunt) that turned the game around and Oliver was a big part of this.

Hunt has the run, he has to learn to not just drop bombs: he needs to fire straight darts.

Edited June 13, 20178 yr by dieter

And here are the Coaches' votes. I had Jones as best on ground so clearly one or more of us has a bit to learn.

MELBOURNE v COLLINGWOOD
10 Christian Petracca (Melb)
4 Jeremy Howe (Coll)
4 Steele Sidebottom (Coll)
4 Clayton Oliver (Melb)
4 Adam Treloar (Coll)
3 Nathan Jones (Melb)
1 Michael Hibberd (Melb)

Oliver with votes from 8 games out of 11.

And every time in those 8 matches he's been awarded votes from both coaches.  I can't be bothered trying to work it out, but I'm virtually certain he would have again considering the breakup of votes for QB.

12 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Oliver with votes from 8 games out of 11.

And every time in those 8 matches he's been awarded votes from both coaches.  I can't be bothered trying to work it out, but I'm virtually certain he would have again considering the breakup of votes for QB.

The players with 4 votes each must have been 4-0, 0-4, 2-2 and 3-1 (or 1-3). So, without going to any other sources such as comments made in media conferences, there's a 50% chance he got votes from both coaches. And a 50% chance he didn't.

4 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

The players with 4 votes each must have been 4-0, 0-4, 2-2 and 3-1 (or 1-3). So, without going to any other sources such as comments made in media conferences, there's a 50% chance he got votes from both coaches. And a 50% chance he didn't.

Four players on four votes means that at least one of them was 4-0. The others could be 2-2, 3-1, 1-3 or 0-4. This gives Oliver a better than 50% chance to have been given votes by both coaches.