Jump to content

Featured Replies

the only concern i have with going after lever is that we will be paying him big $'s, then in the next few years we will have others throwing big $'s at Hogan and Trac, Hunt, etc. which means we have to offer them big $'s to keep them.

 
  On 29/09/2017 at 07:55, Demon77 said:
Jake Lever on playing footy deep into September #AFLGFParade
 
ZbMAZu95ETWtMILk.jpg:small
Can anybody read eyes? Looking up and left is lying , yeah?

Book him in Danno !! ;)

  On 29/09/2017 at 09:02, Deecisive said:

the only concern i have with going after lever is that we will be paying him big $'s, then in the next few years we will have others throwing big $'s at Hogan and Trac, Hunt, etc. which means we have to offer them big $'s to keep them.

Don't think it will be an issue if we are contending.

The CBA is going up and guys like Lewis, Jones & Vince will be finishing up or retired.

They will be replaced by younger players on a lower wage.

 

I'm not sure why people are so concerned with what we might potentially pay Jake. Todd Viney  and his list management team plan for every conceivable senario years out from it eventuating.This will not be a panicked, spur of the moment decision. 

ROO basically admitted the crows have given up on keeping jake


  On 29/09/2017 at 07:55, Demon77 said:
Jake Lever on playing footy deep into September #AFLGFParade
 
ZbMAZu95ETWtMILk.jpg:small
Can anybody read eyes? Looking up and left is lying , yeah?

Three opportunities to give a straight answer and he didn’t. He’s GAWN and hopefully headed our way.

  On 29/09/2017 at 09:07, Is Dom Is Good said:

Don't think it will be an issue if we are contending.

The CBA is going up and guys like Lewis, Jones & Vince will be finishing up or retired.

They will be replaced by younger players on a lower wage.

Agree.

A 20% CBA increase in the cap means $800k is the same as $650k in the past.

And $650k in a few years will be the equivalent of $500K.

You also have to pay market rates to get someone decent. 

Not too much to pay given all defenders can pressure but few can make goid decisions and he will likely be with mfc player the rest of his career

 

Wasn’t disgraced today out on the big stage. Played ok considering how easy the tigers got the ball in.

  On 30/09/2017 at 07:39, Gorgoroth said:

Wasn’t disgraced today out on the big stage. Played ok considering how easy the tigers got the ball in.

Was very average, was OK in the first quarter and racked up some junk time stats late in the game. Gave away a shocking free kick that costed a goal when Adelaide were doing well early.

Showed his lack of speed today and again didn't match up on a quality opponent.You would want a player of his size who is not going to play KP,  to take the likes of Martin or Dangerfield.

Still don't see him being worth the kind of money that is being talked about, whether that is 750 or 900.


Watching the game today through a haze of cheroot smoke and the taste of an Asahi or three it seems obvious we need pace pressure and power and this boy was a rabbit in the headlights so pick 27 and nothing else but also plain to see wattsy is yesterday's hero so pick 29 form port would be okay and keep 10 for speed......

The sad thing is we will pay top dollar, then the Crows will easily find a replacement for him and not miss a beat.

I wouldn't be against keeping pick 10 and forgetting Lever...   groom Joel SMith for that role.

  On 30/09/2017 at 07:55, Petraccattack said:

The sad thing is we will pay top dollar, then the Crows will easily find a replacement for him and not miss a beat.

I wouldn't be against keeping pick 10 and forgetting Lever...   groom Joel SMith for that role.

Lever plays a role that we desperately lack in term of his intercept marking. It's why we're paying overs to get him. He's a huge missing link 

  On 29/09/2017 at 07:55, Demon77 said:
Jake Lever on playing footy deep into September #AFLGFParade
 
ZbMAZu95ETWtMILk.jpg:small
Can anybody read eyes? Looking up and left is lying , yeah?

Yeah that's true, no doubt!  And if you scratch your left [censored] whilst looking over your right shoulder, that's also indicative of a liar. Or perhaps you just have crabs. 


  On 30/09/2017 at 07:55, Petraccattack said:

The sad thing is we will pay top dollar, then the Crows will easily find a replacement for him and not miss a beat.

I wouldn't be against keeping pick 10 and forgetting Lever...   groom Joel SMith for that role.

Fully agree. Overated, nowhere near a first round pick. Develop what we have already and go hard at quality runners who can kick a football

  On 30/09/2017 at 07:49, grey wolf said:

Watching the game today through a haze of cheroot smoke and the taste of an Asahi or three it seems obvious we need pace pressure and power and this boy was a rabbit in the headlights so pick 27 and nothing else but also plain to see wattsy is yesterday's hero so pick 29 form port would be okay and keep 10 for speed......

hahaha

Hmmmm, value dropped a tad today, looked to big and slow for the smalls. Will not be tall enough or strong enough to play on the bigger talls.

Lucky for him most teams have 3rd tall forwards and he can play the intercept role.

 

The kid is good, great below his knees, doesn't fumble, good evading skills and can read the play. 

Regardless if we are giving overs, does this kid walk into our best 22? 

Most of us believe we should chase players to make us better, he will.

I think Jake was quite good today, best of the crows and helped to keep the scoreline from getting real ugly.


  On 30/09/2017 at 09:29, Demon77 said:

The kid is good, great below his knees, doesn't fumble, good evading skills and can read the play. 

Regardless if we are giving overs, does this kid walk into our best 22? 

Most of us believe we should chase players to make us better, he will.

Yeah he does. But. We should inquire as to the availability of Nick Hayne (GWS). I would rate him as good a prospect as Lever. So we have more than one card to play here. Whether the club play it or not. But I would. As to Lever, he did ok today - below his best (but ok). Rance was important for Richmond, and Lever is miles ahead of Rance at this stage of his career. Lever is quality. The thing is, so is Haynes, and can we find other key position back man of quality - in order to make Adelaide believe we aren't do or die on this deal? We need to drive this price (picks wise) down.

  On 30/09/2017 at 09:10, manny100 said:

Hmmmm, value dropped a tad today, looked to big and slow for the smalls. Will not be tall enough or strong enough to play on the bigger talls.

Lucky for him most teams have 3rd tall forwards and he can play the intercept role.

 

Jake Level is 1cm taller than TMcD..... i would think that Hibberd would be getting a small to pick up first.

  On 30/09/2017 at 09:35, ThreeOneSix said:

Yeah he does. But. We should inquire as to the availability of Nick Hayne (GWS). I would rate him as good a prospect as Lever. So we have more than one card to play here. Whether the club play it or not. But I would. As to Lever, he did ok today - below his best (but ok). Rance was important for Richmond, and Lever is miles ahead of Rance at this stage of his career. Lever is quality. The thing is, so is Haynes, and can we find other key position back man of quality - in order to make Adelaide believe we aren't do or die on this deal? We need to drive this price (picks wise) down.

Think Nick may be on his way to St Kilda.

 

It's not up for debate

hes coming

deal done

move on

spoke to my man today regarding Hogan. Was told he's not part of the untradeables but only leaving for absolute top dollar. His management are adamant he's happy in Melbourne and that he'll remain a Dee for quite some time. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 136 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 52 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 376 replies
    Demonland