Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, AngryAtCasey said:

So your obviously assuming that we're destined for a bottom 4-6 finish then if you think our 2nd Round Pick next year will be around 26 after free agent compensation etc?

Errrrr no, but you seem to think we're going to win the flag if you think next year's second rounder will be lower than 36...

 

 
42 minutes ago, Bring Back Barassi said:

Looks more like we met them half way

epedience can open up other opportunities whilst time exists.

we're not finished yet imho

8 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

I think Newton's fate was sealed before we got Lewis but don't want to update info until these things are said by the club (Ditto Dawes, rookies etc)

I was simply answering your question about pick 84 and the number of vacancies we may have.

I'm just walking through the hypotheticals..

 

 
1 hour ago, Jaded said:

Why?

Hibberd is a very very good player, and will make a great structural difference to our side, by allowing Hunt and Salem to play wings. He is in his prime at 26. 

Pick 29 has a 50-50 chance of being a dud. 

We have so many kids on our list, draft picks aren't what we need right now. 

Good deal, and welcome Hibbo. My Essendon friend is crying into his coffee as we speak!

I think its more like 20/30 chance of being a poor pick............

 

29 Eric MacKenzie West Coast Claremont 2006
29 Tom Clurey Port Adelaide Murray U18 2012
29 Byron Donnellan Geelong Donald 1990
29 Touk Miller Gold Coast Calder U18 2014
29 Matthew Connell West Coast Subiaco 1991
29 Ben McKinley West Coast Northern U18 2005
29 Todd Curley Western Bulldogs West Perth 1995
29 Lewis Roberts-Thomson Sydney Swans NSW-ACT U18 2001
29 Adam Hunter West Coast Swan Districts 1999
29 Luke Shackleton Collingwood Tasmania U18 2002
29 Scott Lycett West Coast Port Adelaide (SANFL) 2010
29 Jack Gunston Adelaide Sandringham U18 2009
29 Tim Schmidt Sydney Swans West Adelaide 2003
29 Jason Torney Richmond South Adelaide 1994
29 Brendan Whitecross Hawthorn Zillmere 2007
29 Craig Walker Melbourne North Hobart 1986
29 Sam Phillipou Western Bulldogs Woodville-West Torrens 1992
29 Nathan Turvey Hawthorn South Fremantle 1996
29 Andrew Pascoe Collingwood Norwood 1987
29 Dayne Beams Collingwood Southport 2008
29 Marc Woolnough Geelong Southport 1997
29 Alex Forster Fremantle Norwood 2011
29 Rory Lobb Greater Western Sydney Swan Districts 2013
29 Scott Mollard Essendon Central U18 1993
29 Alex Morgan Essendon Oakleigh U18 2015
29 Wayne Campbell Richmond Golden Square 1989
29 Matt Rosa West Coast North Ballarat U18 2004
29 Tyson Stenglein Adelaide Subiaco 1998
29 Jamie Charman Brisbane Lions Northern Eagles 2000
29 Tim Allen St Kilda Mornington 1988
16 minutes ago, AngryAtCasey said:

So we don't go a full year without injecting any young talent.

2 days ago I would have agreed with you but I think now the Hibbard and Lewis deals are in, unless we can get an overwhelimgly good deal we should secure all our picks next year leaving us in a strong position to draft or trade next year with a full list of 2017 and 18 draft picks


3 minutes ago, stuie said:

You do understand that IF Dunn gets traded THEN the rest of the scenario changes yeah?

 

Presumably for the better for us.  Which would then validate my thinking of not upgrading the two rookies this year.

3 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

I think its more like 20/30 chance of being a poor pick............

 

29 Eric MacKenzie West Coast Claremont 2006
29 Tom Clurey Port Adelaide Murray U18 2012
29 Byron Donnellan Geelong Donald 1990
29 Touk Miller Gold Coast Calder U18 2014
29 Matthew Connell West Coast Subiaco 1991
29 Ben McKinley West Coast Northern U18 2005
29 Todd Curley Western Bulldogs West Perth 1995
29 Lewis Roberts-Thomson Sydney Swans NSW-ACT U18 2001
29 Adam Hunter West Coast Swan Districts 1999
29 Luke Shackleton Collingwood Tasmania U18 2002
29 Scott Lycett West Coast Port Adelaide (SANFL) 2010
29 Jack Gunston Adelaide Sandringham U18 2009
29 Tim Schmidt Sydney Swans West Adelaide 2003
29 Jason Torney Richmond South Adelaide 1994
29 Brendan Whitecross Hawthorn Zillmere 2007
29 Craig Walker Melbourne North Hobart 1986
29 Sam Phillipou Western Bulldogs Woodville-West Torrens 1992
29 Nathan Turvey Hawthorn South Fremantle 1996
29 Andrew Pascoe Collingwood Norwood 1987
29 Dayne Beams Collingwood Southport 2008
29 Marc Woolnough Geelong Southport 1997
29 Alex Forster Fremantle Norwood 2011
29 Rory Lobb Greater Western Sydney Swan Districts 2013
29 Scott Mollard Essendon Central U18 1993
29 Alex Morgan Essendon Oakleigh U18 2015
29 Wayne Campbell Richmond Golden Square 1989
29 Matt Rosa West Coast North Ballarat U18 2004
29 Tyson Stenglein Adelaide Subiaco 1998
29 Jamie Charman Brisbane Lions Northern Eagles 2000
29 Tim Allen St Kilda Mornington 1988

You can't look at it like that.  What if pick 30 had a better strike rate? Would you then conclude that you'd prefer to have pick 30 than pick 29?

 
9 minutes ago, stuie said:

Errrrr no, but you seem to think we're going to win the flag if you think next year's second rounder will be lower than 36...

 

Well Pick 36 this year was held by a club that was knocked out in a semi, so I hardly think we're going to win the flag.  You obviously don't think any free agents will move next year if you think Pick 36 will stay with the premiers.

4 minutes ago, Nasher said:

You can't look at it like that.  What if pick 30 had a better strike rate? Would you then conclude that you'd prefer to have pick 30 than pick 29?

Kind of like flipping a coin a hundred times and getting 70% heads. Those results aren't going to affect your next coin toss at all.


5 minutes ago, AngryAtCasey said:

Well Pick 36 this year was held by a club that was knocked out in a semi, so I hardly think we're going to win the flag.  You obviously don't think any free agents will move next year if you think Pick 36 will stay with the premiers.

I didn't say it would stay with the premiers, but that's a pretty big gamble to say we have to at least make a semi for the trade to simply be equal worth.

Also, who even knows if FA compensation will exist next year? Will there be priority picks for anyone next year? Just more gambles. I prefer to play it safe than gamble away our future.

 

17 hours ago, ProDee said:

That's not my recollection.

We would've had to have been pretty ignorant to not see the writing on the wall, or at the very least factor it in as a possibility.

Just happy to get it done. The upgrade softens it slightly given our ability to find players around that pick.

Dodoro was never going to budge. I wouldn't have put it past him to keep Hibberd on for next season if we didn't play ball.

Hopefully that's the last we have to deal with them for a while.

28 minutes ago, Nasher said:

You can't look at it like that.  What if pick 30 had a better strike rate? Would you then conclude that you'd prefer to have pick 30 than pick 29?

I just did. I was responding to a comment that pick 29 has a 50/50 strike rate. I say its worse than that. If you want to have a discussion about whether you would prefer Michael Hibberd OR have pick 29 and be able to choose from a pool of 500 to find someone better good luck.  I'll leave you to it.

It was about whether Hibberd is worth pick 29 which I happen to think he is. He is exactly of the age, hardness, experience etc that we need.


2 hours ago, beelzebub said:

we are now a football team relying less on the magical maybe out one of raw kids and focusing on ready to go types for TODAY. Tomorrow will be fine.

Welcome Michael

First name terms now Beez:)

58 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Hibberd vs another skinny kid from the draft? We're one of the youngest teams in the comp. This is a great result. 

I'm sure we could have drafted an obese kid if we really wanted to.

2 hours ago, stuie said:

Geez that's a massive slide in points from 47 to 57, didn't realize the difference was so great.

As for our list, as it stands we have 1 free spot right? So if we traded Dunn and delisted Dawes that makes 3 spots. Then using 1 draft pick and upgrading two rookies fills those 3 spots. Correct? And we don't have to use all our picks, just 3.

I know we can use our last picks to upgrade, but why would we bother using pick 84 in the draft?

 

Chris Grant.   Drug Lord Jim?

10 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

anyone know what bomberblitz are saying?

Sh#T, bugger and F##K


Is Hibberd a better player than Melksham? Are they similar types? Did MFC need both? Are there any other questions I should be asking? If yes, what are they?

Edited by bingers
wrong spelling

2 hours ago, AngryAtCasey said:

Next move.  Dunn, Pick 57 & 59 (340 points) to the filth for Picks 47 (316) & 83 (0) .  Puts them in a better position re father/sons.

The trade next years future 2nd Round Pick to Saints for 36.

Can't work Garland into it somewhere :)

 
38 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

anyone know what bomberblitz are saying?

They called their draft forums "Essendon is not appealing draft board".

I lol'd.

1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

We would've had to have been pretty ignorant to not see the writing on the wall, or at the very least factor it in as a possibility.

Which is not what you said.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies