Jump to content

Featured Replies

Look... Everyone has all the right to be cynical and look at the possibility he is leaving after putting contract talks on hold.  But realistically, if my manager said to me in my current place of work "Hey mate. The CEO wants to keep you in the office.. Here is 5 years for x amount. Now.. You can sign that now and stay on or see out the year and have the opportunity to make even more money and sign an extension then."

 

I know what I'd be doing. 

 
2 hours ago, jumbo returns said:

I reckon he's gone.

I'm going to have a far more enjoyable year than you.  :)

19 hours ago, rpfc said:

Some of your neuroses are showing again people.

If we want to keep players of his ilk then acting like he will leave will not help.

He has 2 years left FCS.

Some of you are so effing embarrassing...

Start winning some games and offer him his rightful amount and he will stick around to play with the talent we have surrounded him, and he has bonded, with.

PS. I have talked about this previously but the AFL salary cap is about to have the biggest jump in history - FYI.

Read into that what you will, or just continue to hand-wring.

Couple of things here.

1) most of the big blokes that have left their respective clubs have started negotiating with their club's-to-be a year out from being uncontracted. Two years in this day and actually is more akin to one year.

2) he was presented with targets the club had to reach under Roos and we hit them. There's also clear wins to loss ratio improvement.

3) yes, the salary cap is going up, but Hogan's manager would have known that months ago. He would be negligent not to. Yet, still, Hogan's management sat down and listened to deals at the end of last year. If their intention was to wait until the salary cap jump (that they knew was coming), why did they string us along with negotiations late last year?

4) you can't seriously think we didn't offer him the rightful amount of money. We offered him oodles. Even with salary jumps, we won't be able to offer him more than $10 mill over 10 years.

 
14 hours ago, Good Times Grimes said:

No need to panic.

 

IYkbP9l.gif

I just have to keep this image going

the Colonel has 2 years to run on an already extended contract. 

2016 is an important season

if the Team plays well and Jesse  does his bit this year he should sign. 

If 2016 is a bad year, why would he want to stay?

time for the club to stand up...

2 hours ago, Melb16 said:

But this is 2 years out. It makes sense to hold if. if after this season he puts talks on hold for another year....then we panic!

True - but he did already agree to sit and discuss - why then the need to close shop and so Nah, don't wanna discus until the end of the season now.

We'll see, if he tries the same thing after the CBA has been signed then he's gone. I'm just jaded now after going through the Scully and Clark debacles. If Hogan does leave it will be such a giant kick in the nuts for this club it would set back the work that's been done since 2014.


1 minute ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

True - but he did already agree to sit and discuss - why then the need to close shop and so Nah, don't wanna discus until the end of the season now.

We'll see, if he tries the same thing after the CBA has been signed then he's gone. I'm just jaded now after going through the Scully and Clark debacles. If Hogan does leave it will be such a giant kick in the nuts for this club it would set back the work that's been done since 2014.

I've said this type of thing before and I'll say it again.  If he wants out at some point then so be it.  I don't care.  We should be well compensated.  Enjoy him now and don't be jaded.  A lot of sad negativity on this thread.  Really sad.   (ie.  sad supporters)  cheer up y'all.  I'm [censored] pumped for round 1!  

2 hours ago, chook fowler said:

I would like to know how many stay when they say they will decide at seasons end - close to 0% I would think. Hard not to be cynical.

Cloke held out and scored a massive 4-5 year deal which ends this season. Other than that 0.

 

And the Media will be saying "that will shut them up for a while and stop saying truths about us all the time".

But it will not shut me up you bunch of uni rejects,

If we're getting jumpy before this year has even started, should be totally suicidal 1/2 way through next year.

Unlike some people who have left clubs , would be hard to 'just go along quietly' for a couple of years and I don't think he's that sort of kid anyhow.

He has already shown commitment to us previously and very much  looking forward to watching him go this year.

Go for it Hoges.


2 hours ago, chook fowler said:

I genuinely hope you are all right. Negativity comes with territory from being a fan since 1965. I must admit to be really excited by our current list and football department. It is reassuring having PJ around to handle negotiations.

Chook, you and I have barracked for the dees since 1965. I thought all the problems since then were my fault. Could it be you who's really to blame ??????

2 hours ago, chook fowler said:

I genuinely hope you are all right. Negativity comes with territory from being a fan since 1965. I must admit to be really excited by our current list and football department. It is reassuring having PJ around to handle negotiations.

Chook, you and I have barracked for the dees since 1965. I thought all the problems since then were my fault. Could it be you who's really to blame ??????

17 minutes ago, pineapple dee said:

Chook, you and I have barracked for the dees since 1965. I thought all the problems since then were my fault. Could it be you who's really to blame ??????

Always thought it was my fault. 

44 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

If he does go it will be the biggest Hogan heel turn since Bash at the Beach 96

I can see him doing that in the last game of 2017 - he strolls into the forward line, looking to help out Weideman and a resting Max Gawn, to the cheers from the Demon faithful... before he low blows Gawn, hits a leg drop on a stunned Weideman and embraces a laughing Hayden Ballantyne and a giggling Nat Fyfe.

2 hours ago, AdamFarr said:

Couple of things here.

1) most of the big blokes that have left their respective clubs have started negotiating with their club's-to-be a year out from being uncontracted. Two years in this day and actually is more akin to one year.

2) he was presented with targets the club had to reach under Roos and we hit them. There's also clear wins to loss ratio improvement.

3) yes, the salary cap is going up, but Hogan's manager would have known that months ago. He would be negligent not to. Yet, still, Hogan's management sat down and listened to deals at the end of last year. If their intention was to wait until the salary cap jump (that they knew was coming), why did they string us along with negotiations late last year?

4) you can't seriously think we didn't offer him the rightful amount of money. We offered him oodles. Even with salary jumps, we won't be able to offer him more than $10 mill over 10 years.

1. 2 years is 1 year? Ok, then. How do you argue with that?

2. Hearsay. And what targets were those? Coz they wouldn't have been stratospheric if we 'hit them'...

3. Hearsay that they listened to deals. Hearsay that they 'strung us along'. 

4. The salary cap will (in my estimation) jump $3m. That is how big the TV money increase can easily handle. Hogan's 2015 was a taste of what he can bring, and if you think that a million a year is a good deal for him for his peak years (and there will be plenty) then you are not reading the tea leaves properly. He is worth ~10% of the cap right now (that is $1m btw), if he stays being worth 10% in 5 years that would mean he should be paid $1.7m. To sign a (crazy) long term deal is not in his best interest.


2 hours ago, AdamFarr said:

Couple of things here.

1) most of the big blokes that have left their respective clubs have started negotiating with their club's-to-be a year out from being uncontracted. Two years in this day and actually is more akin to one year.

2) he was presented with targets the club had to reach under Roos and we hit them. There's also clear wins to loss ratio improvement.

3) yes, the salary cap is going up, but Hogan's manager would have known that months ago. He would be negligent not to. Yet, still, Hogan's management sat down and listened to deals at the end of last year. If their intention was to wait until the salary cap jump (that they knew was coming), why did they string us along with negotiations late last year?

4) you can't seriously think we didn't offer him the rightful amount of money. We offered him oodles. Even with salary jumps, we won't be able to offer him more than $10 mill over 10 years.

Spot on. The argument that his management is waiting till the salary cap increase goes through is bogus. Based on that logic, no player will extend their contracts early, yet just this week, Sidebottom and Talia have extended their contracts long term.

The fact that the club admitted that they sat down with Hogan and his management to outline our onfield ambitions is concerning. If a player was content, why the need to give them a reassurance? My concern is that Hogan may love living in Melbourne, and clubs other than Freo may come into play.

 

50 minutes ago, Mgdee said:

Always thought it was my fault. 

I thought it was me. We should form a club lol

3 hours ago, ProDee said:

I'm going to have a far more enjoyable year than you.  :)

I'm just scarred and damaged, PD......scarred and damaged.

35 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

I'm just scarred and damaged, PD......scarred and damaged.

Right with ya there jumbo. 

So we know contract talks are on hold let's start talking to Brayshaws Viney, Petracca,Oliver McDonald's management teams and sign these guys long term. I would offer Brayshaw +3 years Viney same Petracca 4 years Oliver +2 McDonald whatever he wants also Salem and Tyson+3 get the pieces of the puzzle in place. Maybe drop a couple more years on Goodwin as well


The Ox in the Age today says he thinks he has been offered an option of a 3 or 5 year contract for roughly a million a year and yet he has asked for more time and they have thrown up the new TV rights agreement whatever it is called as playing a part in their thoughts. Yes this may increase total salary caps at clubs but really what game are they playing? I don't think it is about money. Either he is off to WA or he is waiting to gauge our improvement as a side before comitting. 

Either way modern footy shytes me, as a minnow club you know if you uncover a talent, it will now be a battle to keep them. 

1 hour ago, Mgdee said:

Always thought it was my fault. 

It's my family's fault. The affliction is congenital not acquired 

  • Author

Still got 40 plus games MINIMUM as an MFC player.

Media have given this far too much oxygen. No wonder Hogan has put off talks when round 1 is just around the corner.

Feck me.

Edited by McQueen

 
9 hours ago, jumbo returns said:

I'm just scarred and damaged, PD......scarred and damaged.

You have the ability to compartmentalise.

So many supporters here not reading the tea leaves...

He doesn't want to live in Perth (yet), so dismiss the "go home factor"

He's "loyal" - a point his manager is keen to point out 

He only extended his last contract 18 months ago

He's only got one season under his belt

With two years still to run he and his advisers think another year to show his wares (and confirm that the Dees are on the right track) makes perfect sense

There are many players on the list (Harmes, Kent, JKH, Tom Mc, Petracca, etc.) that he is very close to and player relationships is one of the major reasons players don't go

He's well aware of his importance to the team and would feel a real responsibility to help make a difference - it might be different if he was 26 and had already given plenty of service 

I'm very relaxed about the situation. 

12 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I just have to keep this image going

the Colonel has 2 years to run on an already extended contract. 

2016 is an important season

if the Team plays well and Jesse  does his bit this year he should sign. 

If 2016 is a bad year, why would he want to stay?

time for the club to stand up...

I think the club off field has done just that, it's time for some of the so called senior players to follow suit. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 528 replies