Jack Trengove re-injures his navicular (2014) - trade deal off

[_becks_ 35]

Have heard that Adelaide are willing to give us pick #10 for Trengrove and pick#23

[What 18,810]

Have heard that Adelaide are willing to give us pick #10 for Trengrove and pick#23

If that deal gets done on ts own, we can rule out Dangerfield

[Jaded No More 68,973]

Well that's all over. Poor kid! We are cursed

• Melbourne FC ‏@melbournefc 46s46 seconds ago 2/2: We will now seek further advice from surgeons for a plan moving forward so Jack can return to playing football. Expand

  • Reply
  • Retweet
  • Favorite
  • More

• Melbourne FC ‏@melbournefc 55s55 seconds ago In regards to preliminary trade discussions: as Jack has not been medically cleared, he will remain at the Melbourne Football Club. 1/2 Expand

  • Reply
  • Retweet
  • Favorite
  • More

• Melbourne FC ‏@melbournefc 2m2 minutes ago NEWS: Jack Trengove has re-aggravated his navicular injury in his left foot: http://mfcde.es/11gi6CM View summary

  • Reply
  • Retweet
  • Favorite
  • More

[Mr Steve 3,820]

Didn't move fast enough Melbourne can't trade him now.

[What 18,810]

poor guy

damn

[InVINCEable 358]

Ahh [censored] me, he's injured again?!

[Guest]

Geez....
That's bloody horrible to hear.

[Dr. Gonzo 24,289]

That sucks, really feel for the kid. Kinda glad he's not going anywhere but bloody hell, will we ever see him play again? Last year of his contract next year.

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2014-10-14/trengove-reaggravates-navicular-injury

Edited October 13, 2014 by Dr. Gonzo

[reynolds46 1,269]

did he injure it trying to pass the medical at Punt Road?

[Breggsy 123]

Probably more feeling shattered now than I was at the thought of him being traded

[Striker475 696]

That sucks, really feel for the kid. Kinda glad he's not going anywhere but bloody hell, will we ever see him play again? Last year of his contract next year.

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2014-10-14/trengove-reaggravates-navicular-injury

Thought he was signed til 2016?

[Mr Steve 3,820]

Very sorry he has re-aggravated his navicular injury, glad he is still a Demon. Good luck with the treatment Jack.

[Nasher 33,617]

An everyone loses outcome.

[KLV 1,768]

JT has failed his medical, re injured his foot, same thing. Poor Jack. He stays a dee, but back to rehab

[rjay 25,086]

Ahhhhhh!!!!!

[whatwhat say what 22,938]

it would appear navicular injuries are very, very hard to come back from.

[Bluey's Dad 3,419]

An everyone loses outcome.

Indeed.

If Richmond's pick 12 was required for the mooted 'star trade', we are going to have to find another avenue. Not sure what else Richmond would want.

[Webber 10,538]

Sadly, this is precisely the thing you don't want with a navicular, on account of it representing the likelihood of developing 'avascular necrosis' of that bone, meaning death of the bone through lack of blood supply. It's not done just yet, but Jack's playing future is now doubtful. Huge knock for a seemingly very good bloke, whatever the MFC planned for him.

[Deestroy All 14,266]

This is so bad for absolutely everyone except probably [censored] Richmond.

[rpfc 28,769]

Poor fella.

It's not about where he plays, it's about whether he will ever play again.

[Guest]

When will our club catch a [censored] break?!

[Redjacket 756]

Did we try to sell a lemon?

[Nasher 33,617]

Poor fella.

It's not about where he plays, it's about whether he will ever play again.

Agreed. Really disappointed for the bloke.

[ManDee 7,222]

Amazing difference a day makes, yesterday we thought the 12-23 Trenners trade was in their favour, today we would jump at it. I think our medicos,new that he was limited.

Bad luck Jack.

[jnrmac 20,185]

Just got some mail that a trade with JT won't happen. Cant say why just yet as it will identify my source. I believe it to be good though.

Sorry to hear for Jack..

How's my strike rate compared to GNF and Chook ha ha....