TGR 1,367 Posted September 29, 2014 Posted September 29, 2014 Luke Breust - Fair dinkum, he never holds his feet in a contest. Throws his head back constantly. In an average side, this guy would be shown up big time. A+ grade set shot, but that is it. Has thrived on getting the 3rd or 4th best defender for years; and also thrived on quick perfect delivery. Mitch Duncan - I hope we don't get him for Clark. Might as well let Clark go in the draft.
Wiseblood 24,637 Posted September 29, 2014 Posted September 29, 2014 Breust and Duncan are overrated? Yeah, right.
DomTysonsLeftFoot22 20 Posted September 29, 2014 Posted September 29, 2014 Luke Breust - Fair dinkum, he never holds his feet in a contest. Throws his head back constantly. In an average side, this guy would be shown up big time. A+ grade set shot, but that is it. Has thrived on getting the 3rd or 4th best defender for years; and also thrived on quick perfect delivery. Mitch Duncan - I hope we don't get him for Clark. Might as well let Clark go in the draft. Mitch Duncan would be completely off limits by the cats. He would be close to our best player if he did come across. I would take him in a heart beat. Hopefully we get something better than a Taylor Hunt who is apparently out of favor down there. Also no interest in their injury prone ruckman Simpson/Vardy either. Preferred trade would be with Collingwood. In my mind if we are to lose clark, why not fill a running half back role which is required with Lamumba. Now that it seems that Jaksch, O'Rourke are both heading home and likely to command first round picks. Maybe we can work come magic with GWS to send Petracca to them and have one of their mids come too us with a shuffle of picks.
Guest Posted September 29, 2014 Posted September 29, 2014 Luke Breust - Fair dinkum, he never holds his feet in a contest. Throws his head back constantly. In an average side, this guy would be shown up big time. A+ grade set shot, but that is it. Has thrived on getting the 3rd or 4th best defender for years; and also thrived on quick perfect delivery. Mitch Duncan - I hope dream of us don't getting him for Clark. Might as well let Clark go in the draft. Would be a massive coup.
Little Goffy 14,952 Posted September 29, 2014 Posted September 29, 2014 dafuq Troll I heard Dafuq had an ok season playing for the Gympie B's. Not sure his fitness is up to AFL standard though. Troll, well I'm shocked to see him disparaged like this. Somehow seems to get to every contest, has an immediate impact and draws multiple taggers. Might not be the prettiest player to watch, but he gets a job done.
TGR 1,367 Posted August 8, 2016 Author Posted August 8, 2016 On 9/29/2014 at 1:16 PM, TGR said: Luke Breust - Fair dinkum, he never holds his feet in a contest. Throws his head back constantly. In an average side, this guy would be shown up big time. A+ grade set shot, but that is it. Has thrived on getting the 3rd or 4th best defender for years; and also thrived on quick perfect delivery. Mitch Duncan - I hope we don't get him for Clark. Might as well let Clark go in the draft. I will add Josh Caddy to these B-graders.
CBDees 3,167 Posted August 8, 2016 Posted August 8, 2016 2 minutes ago, TGR said: I will add Josh Caddy to these B-graders. Now what on earth inspired you to resurrect a 'two-year-old' thread for that advice?
Deestroy All 14,266 Posted August 8, 2016 Posted August 8, 2016 6 minutes ago, TGR said: I will add Josh Caddy to these B-graders. G'day Rono. Your thoughts on our list, if you will?
Coq au vin 755 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 How many Hawthorn premierships has Breust played in? How many goals has he kicked? I think MFC would love to have him.
hells bells 2,023 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 13 hours ago, TGR said: I will add Josh Caddy to these B-graders. Who do you think we should avoid this year TGR? I'm expecting the Tigers, Pies and Dockers to be looking to off-load a few.
Straight Sets Simon 23,113 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 14 hours ago, TGR said: I will add Josh Caddy to these B-graders. Cockatoo.
poita 3,944 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 Suban & Rohan. Any overrated, overpaid former premiership player. The dregs from Essendon's list.
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 Duncan, Bruest and Caddy will not be on the trade table so i don't understand the thread. I didn't think we should have chased Melksham last year.
Undeeterred 3,127 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 4 minutes ago, Abe said: Duncan, Bruest and Caddy will not be on the trade table so i don't understand the thread. I didn't think we should have chased Melksham last year. It was started two years ago.
stuie 7,374 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 GWS players, especially ones who can't break into the regular 22, that's where it's at. We have a good trade relationship with them too. Continue to build and improve our depth.
Biffen 12,949 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 2 minutes ago, stuie said: GWS players, especially ones who can't break into the regular 22, that's where it's at. We have a good trade relationship with them too. Continue to build and improve our depth. Is that because you were just listening to Sen discussing Tyson and Bruce etc..? Who then?
stuie 7,374 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 9 minutes ago, Biffen said: Is that because you were just listening to Sen discussing Tyson and Bruce etc..? Who then? No I wasn't actually. I've said before, Tomlinson and Hoskin-Elliot would be two I would go after that we could get relatively cheaply.
Demon Disciple 12,530 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 10 minutes ago, stuie said: No I wasn't actually. I've said before, Tomlinson and Hoskin-Elliot would be two I would go after that we could get relatively cheaply. I'd rather Marchbank to go along with HE, than Tomlinson.
stuie 7,374 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 Just now, Demon Disciple said: I'd rather Marchbank to go along with HE, than Tomlinson. Yeah like Marchbank too as far as trade targets go, just think Tomlinson is a better age for our current needs.
DeeSpencer 26,667 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 12 minutes ago, stuie said: No I wasn't actually. I've said before, Tomlinson and Hoskin-Elliot would be two I would go after that we could get relatively cheaply. I think GWS would set the bar pretty high for both those guys. Tomlinson as a tall in particular would cost at least a decent 2nd rounder and WHE might be the same. They both seem to have a little more currency in my mind than Bugg last year. Trading next years 2nd rounder could be an option for us. I'd rather keep this years as it could fall at a nice spot where someone we rate highly gets through to it.
stuie 7,374 Posted August 9, 2016 Posted August 9, 2016 1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said: I think GWS would set the bar pretty high for both those guys. Tomlinson as a tall in particular would cost at least a decent 2nd rounder and WHE might be the same. They both seem to have a little more currency in my mind than Bugg last year. Trading next years 2nd rounder could be an option for us. I'd rather keep this years as it could fall at a nice spot where someone we rate highly gets through to it. Not sure Tomlinson would cost a second rounder, has played plenty of NEAFL this year. I was more thinking something like a future second rounder and maybe Garland for both Tomlinson and Hoskin-Elliot. Not sure how the points system works this year, but Mahoney might be able to wrangle another deal where we swap some picks to help GWS out fit in what they need to do as part of a deal.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.