Patrick Dangerfield

[beelzebub 23,312]

So does that mean we get Walker and pick 50 for Toumpas?

wouldnt have thought that too bad for a VFL player

[The Chazz 4,077]

wouldnt have thought that too bad for a VFL player

AKA depth player that is still a kid, hoping to enter his second full, uninterrupted preseason.

Pick 50 in a weak draft, plus a spud from a team on the slide. Yep, can see that's an upgrade...

[Devo 104]

Did anyone hear David King's idea about Dangerfield going as a free agent and then the clubs swapping picks and players after? What an idiot, it would make a mockery of the AFL's free agency and trade system.

Plus he also listed Cory Gregson as an A grade player? He is promising but he is hardly A grade. The guy is seriously an idiot.

They wouldn't be able to get away with that. AFL rules prohibit it.

[Dr. Gonzo 24,129]

Heard somewhere that if anybody else decides to trump the Cats, danger will only sign a 1 year deal with them and then request a trade.

Someone needs to check his privilege.

Entitled little gifted [censored]!

That's draft tampering and if the AFL had any balls they would knock that on the head right now.

[daisycutter 29,600]

That's draft tampering and if the AFL had any balls they would knock that on the head right now.

they didn't when buckley did it to the bears

[beelzebub 23,312]

AKA depth player that is still a kid, hoping to enter his second full, uninterrupted preseason.

Pick 50 in a weak draft, plus a spud from a team on the slide. Yep, can see that's an upgrade...

i understand the position if say any pick or player is viewed in isolation. To be honest I view the whole period as a holistic event.

We start off with "x" players and "Y" picks we end up with "S" players and "T" picks. Hopefully after the circus has left town we are better for it all.

In that light I dont put the whole weight individually on trades and such...its how it all progresses and what we end up with.

The whole draft is this side of a raffle at best. We have 'weak' drafts producing some players later on and "strong" drafts providing duds up front.

bit like a cr@p game

[The Chazz 4,077]

i understand the position if say any pick or player is viewed in isolation. To be honest I view the whole period as a holistic event.

We start off with "x" players and "Y" picks we end up with "S" players and "T" picks. Hopefully after the circus has left town we are better for it all.

In that light I dont put the whole weight individually on trades and such...its how it all progresses and what we end up with.

The whole draft is this side of a raffle at best. We have 'weak' drafts producing some players later on and "strong" drafts providing duds up front.

bit like a cr@p game

Has 'deeluded' hacked your account, B59?

[The DeviI Inside 18]

The Devil Inside Returns

[olisik 4,060]

The Devil Inside Returns

Hi

[Lucifers Hero 39,390]

The Devil Inside Returns

...but Satyr wouldn't 'Like' each and every one of his own posts

[The Chazz 4,077]

...but Satyr wouldn't 'Like' each and every one of his own posts

I think 'The Devil Inside' is Barrett. He'd be the only one that 'likes' everything that comes out his own mouth...

Edited September 30, 2015 by billy2803

[Deecisive 1,709]

Dr. Gonzo, on 30 Sept 2015 - 2:26 PM, said:

That's draft tampering and if the AFL had any balls they would knock that on the head right now.

it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

[daisycutter 29,600]

it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

did caro really say that?

that's double dipping and definitely draft tampering

even caro would know that

[beelzebub 23,312]

Exactly, it's not Saty.

Its school holidays....need I say more

[rpfc 28,239]

it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

did caro really say that?

that's double dipping and definitely draft tampering

even caro would know that

The AFL will make up a rule on the fly and stop that.

Effing ridiculous. And Geelong should just say "thanks for not meeting the contract. See ya!"

Wouldn't that be a guffaw?

[chookrat 4,247]

it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

This wont happen as the 16 other clubs that slip back a player in the draft will burn down AFL house.

[mo64 5,851]

it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

That's like the Veale deal, which is now considered draft tampering.

[Goodvibes 3,596]

This wont happen as the 16 other clubs that slip back a player in the draft will burn down AFL house.

Smacks of Veale deal.

[DeeZee 7,361]

It would be great if we could snare Dangerfield, and then use him for depth, just in case a Terlich or Matty Jones get injured.

[AzzKikA 2,371]

The Devil Inside Returns

And....

[olisik 4,060]

The Devil Inside

[dazzledavey36 54,119]

The Devil Inside

Can the mods ban this clown.

Absolute troll

[olisik 4,060]

Can the mods ban this clown.

Absolute troll

Sounds like someone has a twist in their panties lol

Edited October 1, 2015 by olisik

[ManDee 7,124]

Sounds like someone has a twist in their panties lol

I hate that.

[jötnar 25]

Can the mods ban this clown.

Absolute troll

I resemble that.