Jump to content

Patrick Dangerfield

Demonsterative
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

So does that mean we get Walker and pick 50 for Toumpas?

wouldnt have thought that too bad for a VFL player

  • Quote
    •  

    wouldnt have thought that too bad for a VFL player

    AKA depth player that is still a kid, hoping to enter his second full, uninterrupted preseason.

    Pick 50 in a weak draft, plus a spud from a team on the slide. Yep, can see that's an upgrade... :wacko:

  • Quote

    Did anyone hear David King's idea about Dangerfield going as a free agent and then the clubs swapping picks and players after? What an idiot, it would make a mockery of the AFL's free agency and trade system.

    Plus he also listed Cory Gregson as an A grade player? He is promising but he is hardly A grade. The guy is seriously an idiot.

    They wouldn't be able to get away with that. AFL rules prohibit it.

  • Quote
    •  

    Heard somewhere that if anybody else decides to trump the Cats, danger will only sign a 1 year deal with them and then request a trade.

    Someone needs to check his privilege.

    Entitled little gifted [censored]!

    That's draft tampering and if the AFL had any balls they would knock that on the head right now.

  • Quote

    That's draft tampering and if the AFL had any balls they would knock that on the head right now.

    they didn't when buckley did it to the bears

  • Quote

    AKA depth player that is still a kid, hoping to enter his second full, uninterrupted preseason.

    Pick 50 in a weak draft, plus a spud from a team on the slide. Yep, can see that's an upgrade... :wacko:

    i understand the position if say any pick or player is viewed in isolation. To be honest I view the whole period as a holistic event.

    We start off with "x" players and "Y" picks we end up with "S" players and "T" picks. Hopefully after the circus has left town we are better for it all.

    In that light I dont put the whole weight individually on trades and such...its how it all progresses and what we end up with.

    The whole draft is this side of a raffle at best. We have 'weak' drafts producing some players later on and "strong" drafts providing duds up front.

    bit like a cr@p game :)

  • Quote

    i understand the position if say any pick or player is viewed in isolation. To be honest I view the whole period as a holistic event.

    We start off with "x" players and "Y" picks we end up with "S" players and "T" picks. Hopefully after the circus has left town we are better for it all.

    In that light I dont put the whole weight individually on trades and such...its how it all progresses and what we end up with.

    The whole draft is this side of a raffle at best. We have 'weak' drafts producing some players later on and "strong" drafts providing duds up front.

    bit like a cr@p game :)

    Has 'deeluded' hacked your account, B59? :P

  • Quote
    •  

    The Devil Inside Returns

    ...but Satyr wouldn't 'Like' each and every one of his own posts :unsure:

  • Quote

    ...but Satyr wouldn't 'Like' each and every one of his own posts :unsure:

    I think 'The Devil Inside' is Barrett. He'd be the only one that 'likes' everything that comes out his own mouth...

    Edited by billy2803

  • Quote
    Dr. Gonzo, on 30 Sept 2015 - 2:26 PM, said:

    That's draft tampering and if the AFL had any balls they would knock that on the head right now.

    it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

  • Quote

    it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

    did caro really say that?

    that's double dipping and definitely draft tampering

    even caro would know that

  • Quote

    Exactly, it's not Saty.

    Its school holidays....need I say more

  • Quote

    it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

    did caro really say that?

    that's double dipping and definitely draft tampering

    even caro would know that

    The AFL will make up a rule on the fly and stop that.

    Effing ridiculous. And Geelong should just say "thanks for not meeting the contract. See ya!"

    Wouldn't that be a guffaw?

  • Quote

    it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

    This wont happen as the 16 other clubs that slip back a player in the draft will burn down AFL house.

  • Quote

    it is really unclear what is tampering and what is allowed. Heard Caro mention on the radio the possibility that Adelaide will not match the Dangerfield offer from Geelong so they get a 1st round pick from the ALF. Then geelong trades Adelaide for another player but gives up their first draft pick and another pick. So Adelaide still get to first rounders for danger. That to me is draft tampering.

    That's like the Veale deal, which is now considered draft tampering.

  • Quote

    This wont happen as the 16 other clubs that slip back a player in the draft will burn down AFL house.

    Smacks of Veale deal.

  • Quote

    It would be great if we could snare Dangerfield, and then use him for depth, just in case a Terlich or Matty Jones get injured.

  • Quote

    The Devil Inside

    Can the mods ban this clown.

    Absolute troll

  • Quote

    Can the mods ban this clown.

    Absolute troll

    Sounds like someone has a twist in their panties lol

    Edited by olisik

  • Quote
    •  

    Sounds like someone has a twist in their panties lol

    I hate that.

  • Quote

    Can the mods ban this clown.

    Absolute troll

    I resemble that.

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Carlton

      I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Carlton

      The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: St. Kilda

      The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 111 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Carlton

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • 31 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Carlton

      Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Thanks
      • 22 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Carlton

      A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 315 replies
      Demonland
    View All