Straight Sets Simon 23,113 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 ok now is time to panic He has retired from footy so I'm not surprised. If he was thinking of coming back to Melbourne then I doubt he would have removed it. Or I'm just reading too much into it. Probably just reading too much into it.
binman 44,870 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 If he was thinking of coming back to Melbourne then I doubt he would have removed it. Or I'm just reading too much into it. Probably just reading too much into it. He wants a new number - new start new number. He can have whatever number he wants!
leucopogon 1,519 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 He's gone, FCS can't we all admit it already?
Nasher 33,686 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 He wants a new number - new start new number. He can have whatever number he wants! Personally I think #54 has had far too little love in recent years. All yours, Mitch!
binman 44,870 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 #54 would allow him to fly in under the radar - 'who is that 54, he looks like he can play a bit'
nutbean 8,838 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 He's gone, FCS can't we all admit it already? You can't understand the speculation ? - he has tweeted he is training albeit by himself. There is speculation ( unsubstantiated) both from a reliable source on DL and plenty in the media that he is training and will decide end October if he wants to have another crack. It may all amount to nothing but I would hardly suggest that the door is closed.
mauriesy 7,445 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 #54 where are you? That's showing my age.
Pink Freud 378 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 Mitch Clark has taken the number 11 off his twitter handle. Anyone read anything into that?
What 18,810 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 people who keep saying hes retired, its reported hes in training and will meet with his manager about a possible comeback the door is wide open
leucopogon 1,519 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 You can't understand the speculation ? - he has tweeted he is training albeit by himself. There is speculation ( unsubstantiated) both from a reliable source on DL and plenty in the media that he is training and will decide end October if he wants to have another crack. It may all amount to nothing but I would hardly suggest that the door is closed. So what he's training, my wife's "training"....to keep fit. As for the reliable source, i won't say one way or the other if I believe it. Even if Clark says he wants to play next year, translating that desire into actually running out again on the G and not suffering another heartbreaking pre-season in the rehab group remains to be seen. My money is that this optimism/hope will amount to nothing.
nutbean 8,838 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 So what he's training, my wife's "training"....to keep fit. As for the reliable source, i won't say one way or the other if I believe it. Even if Clark says he wants to play next year, translating that desire into actually running out again on the G and not suffering another heartbreaking pre-season in the rehab group remains to be seen. My money is that this optimism/hope will amount to nothing. You are probably right but you are asking posters to dismiss something that is not out of the realms. It is being fanned by posters, media and the man himself by posting that he is training
leucopogon 1,519 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 I'm a jaded pessimistic demon fan Nutbean, what can I say?
nutbean 8,838 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 I'm a jaded pessimistic demon fan Nutbean, what can I say? Meh... you are talking to the President of that club.
Jaded No More 68,976 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 I think carrying the number 11 on his back was a really heavy burden for Clark and made his inability to get on the field that much harder for him to deal with. He was very effected by Jim's passing, and obviously felt a huge sense of responsibility to represent that jumper. It wouldn't surprise me, on the slim chance that he returns, that he chooses a different jumper number. It's a small thing, but it might ease a lot of unnecessary anxiety. He can have any number he wants FFS. JUST COME BACK MITCH!!
dazzledavey36 56,399 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 Mitch was meeting his manager today.
Redleg 42,189 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 #54 would allow him to fly in under the radar - 'who is that 54, he looks like he can play a bit' The number worn by the great Trevor Korn.
nutbean 8,838 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 The number worn by the great Trevor Korn. an Ajax living legend
Whispering_Jack 31,380 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 The number worn by the great Trevor Korn. My table number from last night's b & f.
jumbo returns 6,745 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 I think carrying the number 11 on his back was a really heavy burden for Clark and made his inability to get on the field that much harder for him to deal with. He was very effected by Jim's passing, and obviously felt a huge sense of responsibility to represent that jumper. It wouldn't surprise me, on the slim chance that he returns, that he chooses a different jumper number. It's a small thing, but it might ease a lot of unnecessary anxiety. He can have any number he wants FFS. JUST COME BACK MITCH!! The #11 should be retired forever.
P-man 13,367 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 I think carrying the number 11 on his back was a really heavy burden for Clark and made his inability to get on the field that much harder for him to deal with. He was very effected by Jim's passing, and obviously felt a huge sense of responsibility to represent that jumper. Wonder if there's a similar argument for Grimes. Has regressed since taking Barrassi's 31 (on Neeld's advice...another Neeld pearl of wisdom).
daisycutter 30,022 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 Wonder if there's a similar argument for Grimes. Has regressed since taking Barrassi's 31 (on Neeld's advice...another Neeld pearl of wisdom). oh come on, have we regressed to numerology now?
Sir Why You Little 37,478 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 Should of kept his No. 16
jumbo returns 6,745 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 Wonder if there's a similar argument for Grimes. Has regressed since taking Barrassi's 31 (on Neeld's advice...another Neeld pearl of wisdom). Struggling to move on?
Go the Biff 3,474 Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 Should of kept his No. 16 Agreed. Another dumb-arse Schwab idea. Surprised you let that one slip through to the 'keeper WYL
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.