Jump to content

DEMONLAND PLAYER OF THE YEAR - ROUND 3


Demonland


Recommended Posts



Posted

6 Watts

5.Cross

4. N jones

3 . Howe

2. Pederson

1.Tyson

Posted

6- Tyson ( composed and accumulated countless possessions)

5 - Cross ( the consummate professional )

4 - Pederson ( should never play forward again)

3 - Dunn ( for great first half )

2 - Georgiou ( gave away enormous weight and height advantage , but held his own )

1 - McDonald ( horrible disposal , but always gave a contest)


Posted

6. Tyson

5. Howe

4. N.Jones

3. Cross

2. Watts

1. McDonald

Posted

Georgiou and Pedersen were excellent down back. We lost this one in the midfield.

6 - Pedersen

5 - Georgiou

4 - Tyson

3 - Cross

2 - McDonald

1 - Watts


Posted

6.Dom Tyson

5. Jeremy Howe

4. Tom Mcdonald

3.Daniel Cross

2. Lynden Dunn

1. Jack Watts


Posted

6.Watts

5.Tyson

4.Howe

3.Cross

2.Dunn

1.Georgiou

Posted

6. McDonald

5. Tyson

4. Howe

3. Georgiou

2. Dunn

1. Pederson

Posted

Really was a defender's game.

6 McDonald

5 Howe

4 Pedersen

3 Tyson

2 Dunn

1 Georgiou


Posted

Obviously looking at the votes today Watts did more than I noticed. Anyways....

6. Tyson

5. Pederson

4. Georgiou

3. McDonald

2. Cross

1. Dunn


Posted

6. Tyson
5. Pedersen

4. Howe
3. Cross
2. McDonald
1. N. Jones

Posted

For the first time in ages, we have a name other than Nathan Jones as our leader. Dom Tyson is a real revelation in our gloomy season thus far.

42. Dom Tyson

31. Nathan Jones

25. Lynden Dunn

17. Jack Watts

14. Jeremy Howe

12. Daniel Cross Tom McDonald

8. Bernie Vince

6. Alexis Georgiou Jimmy Toumpas

3. Matt Jones Dean Terlich Jack Trengove

2. Shannon Byrnes James Frawley

1. Cam Pedersen

A poster asked last week how the votes were calculated. We take three sets of votes at random and tally them up each week.


Posted

For the first time in ages, we have a name other than Nathan Jones as our leader. Dom Tyson is a real revelation in our gloomy season thus far.

42. Dom Tyson

31. Nathan Jones

25. Lynden Dunn

17. Jack Watts

14. Jeremy Howe

12. Daniel Cross Tom McDonald

8. Bernie Vince

6. Alexis Georgiou Jimmy Toumpas

3. Matt Jones Dean Terlich Jack Trengove

2. Shannon Byrnes James Frawley

1. Cam Pedersen

A poster asked last week how the votes were calculated. We take three sets of votes at random and tally them up each week.

You must have deliberately chosen the three people who didn't like Pedersen's game then!

Posted

For the first time in ages, we have a name other than Nathan Jones as our leader. Dom Tyson is a real revelation in our gloomy season thus far.

42. Dom Tyson

31. Nathan Jones

25. Lynden Dunn

17. Jack Watts

14. Jeremy Howe

12. Daniel Cross Tom McDonald

8. Bernie Vince

6. Alexis Georgiou Jimmy Toumpas

3. Matt Jones Dean Terlich Jack Trengove

2. Shannon Byrnes James Frawley

1. Cam Pedersen

A poster asked last week how the votes were calculated. We take three sets of votes at random and tally them up each week.

Can I suggest a better idea would be to than take the final leaderboard as 6-1 for the weeks votes. I feel that's a far better indicator than 3 random sets of votes.

AKA for this week it would be Tyson 6, Jones 5, Dunn 4, Watts 3, Howe 2 and McDonald 1 (as he garnered more BOG's).

You've got a system that works, so I'm sure you're the best to judge, but just an idea :)

Posted

For the first time in ages, we have a name other than Nathan Jones as our leader. Dom Tyson is a real revelation in our gloomy season thus far.

42. Dom Tyson

31. Nathan Jones

25. Lynden Dunn

17. Jack Watts

14. Jeremy Howe

12. Daniel Cross Tom McDonald

8. Bernie Vince

6. Alexis Georgiou Jimmy Toumpas

3. Matt Jones Dean Terlich Jack Trengove

2. Shannon Byrnes James Frawley

1. Cam Pedersen

A poster asked last week how the votes were calculated. We take three sets of votes at random and tally them up each week.

I reckon the top 3 are pretty well bang on to what the top 3 in our best and fairest would be right now

Posted

Can I suggest a better idea would be to than take the final leaderboard as 6-1 for the weeks votes. I feel that's a far better indicator than 3 random sets of votes.

AKA for this week it would be Tyson 6, Jones 5, Dunn 4, Watts 3, Howe 2 and McDonald 1 (as he garnered more BOG's).

You've got a system that works, so I'm sure you're the best to judge, but just an idea :)

Not sure how you worked that out when Jones got a grand total above of about 9 votes, while Pedersen got around 47? How does Jones rank 2nd this week and Pedersen not even get a mention? Maybe I'm missing something?

Posted

Mote than half the voters had Pedersen in the top 3 on the ground.

Three sets of votes is far too small a sample imo.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...