nature and conduct of investigation was lawful.

AFL.com says "concluded that Andruska was under pressure from ASADA and Essendon to come to a quick decision"

theage.com says "I have concluded that Andruska was under some pressure from the then federal government and the AFL"

So which did he say? Pressure from the AFL or pressure from Essendon?

Selective reporting from the AFLs media department?

Again:

The Age: "By 1 Feb 2013, both ASADA and AFL had agreed to investigate Essendon, and had concluded that ASADA should use AFL powers."

AFL.com: "Based on evidence, conclude by Feb 1 ASADA and Essendon had agreed to investigate Essendon"

Good night.

Good night.

This looks promising

wj had it right all along - bombers went the man (well, woman), not the ball.

Gee If I'm not fully understanding everything the judge is saying I can only imagine how much Mark Robinson is struggling.

Love this: In contracting with AFL to play, players/Hird give up the right to claim self-incrimination!!! GONE!

Edited September 19, 201411 yr by Lucifer's Hero

Good night.

Irene.

oh they are gone

Investigation was lawful.... Dons to pay all costs I assume.

When will they appeal, can't wait to hear from Hird and Little on the street, oh and the Dank.

They can appeal, add the system allows them too, but surely they will be allowed to issue show cause notices in the mean time?

Let's make a play for Zaha and Heppel. Cos stuff them

this is a 148 point thumping.

Gee If I'm not fully understanding everything the judge is saying I can only imagine how much Mark Robinson is struggling.

He was on SEN last night and said he was turning up today, they asked him if he was getting the suit pressed and he could take his Dictaphone in with him, his response: "I have no idea what is going on or what I can take or not".

For the chief footy "writer" he has no idea.

Investigation was lawful.... Dons to pay all costs I assume.

When will they appeal, can't wait to hear from Hird and Little on the street, oh and the Dank.

If they attempt to appeal I suspect the AFL community as a whole would tear them a new one! Even Little would be stupid to attempt it.

Hird on the other hand.... well....

He was on SEN last night and said he was turning up today, they asked him if he was getting the suit pressed and he could take his Dictaphone in with him, his response: "I have no idea what is going on or what I can take or not".

For the chief footy "writer" he has no idea.

..and "what is a suit"?

Bang!!!!!!! Right between the eyes

Does the actual amount of "costs" get published?

Edited September 19, 201411 yr by deanox

2 weeks to appeal

reckon itll be monday.

Edited September 19, 201411 yr by biggestred

ASADA won. Hird stuffed!!

HahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahBahhHahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

2:00pm:

Middleton: Hird/Essendon until October 1st at 4pm to lodge an appeal.

Otherwise Essendon/Hird must pay costs of ASADA.

aaawwwww yyiiiiiisssssss

Can ASADA now proceed with the show cause notices? Even if Ess appeal? Any legal eagles here clarify what happens next?

2 weeks to appeal

reckon itll be monday.

Monday? Try 2.05pm today!!!

Bang!