Retire / Delist - How many and who?

[Ryan Dee 140]

Miller's listed on our club page on the AFL website at 194cms & 94 kgs.

I'm just going by what i've read about what some recruiters think. Generally its about 195cm's they're looking for. Its a rough estimate. I'd say 190-192cm's would be considered under-sized for a KPF.

194cm's is close enough to 195cm's ain't it?? Plus, he's a tank. It's not just his height, but his frame and his upper body.

He's a KPF goddamit, but he should be playing in the VFL...

Alright ill go with that then

Edited August 12, 2009 by Mr Morton

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

No way will we just delist Jamar.

He's of far more value than Cheney.

Exactly.

I'd retire McDonald, Robbo, Whelan & Wheatley.

Trade Newton, Buckley, Johnson, Bell.

Lets us have 4 picks ND, 1 pick PSD and elevate Valenti & Spencer. 1 more year on rookie list for McKenzie for mine.

You need seven players off the list.

You wont get a serious trade for PJ Bell or Juice.

Buckley is out of contract.

And I would rather have Buckley on the list than Valenti by the length of a racecourse straight.

[pantaloons 2,019]

I can't see us being overly active in trade week. If we're going to be moving up draft spots, teams aren't going to want our phlegm in return. A possibility if we were only looking to use 1, 2, 18 34 and PSD1, would be to trade 34 and 50 for 30 or something similar, to a team who wants to use a pick that late. It's not a massive return, but it could make a little something out of nothing for us. We end up with 1, 2, 18, 30 and PSD 1, while the other team ends up with 14, 34, 46 and 50 instead of 14, 30, 46 and 62. Just a hypothetical though. I've no idea who will even have those picks, likely the Dogs or Crows.

Edited August 12, 2009 by pantaloons

[Rogue 585]

Surely if we are aiming to draft a ruckman we will have too many if we don't let one go.

And if we aren't looking to draft a ruckman then we must be looking to develop form within... and personally I think the cupboard is pretty bare.

First, you're assuming we're aiming to draft a ruckman, but I doubt we're going to draft a ruckman with one of our high picks. I'd rookie a ruckman, like I'd have done every year for quite a few now. Even if we do bring in some young rucks, they're likely to be years off the pace, aren't they? PJ and Meesen will be out of contract soon.

Second, Jamar's our number 1 ruckman by a long, long way. Meesen's only had people in raptures because he played okay when they thought he wasn't fit to play 2nds at my local Club. PJ's had plenty of opportunities to take the #1 ruck spot in a weak side without great ruck stocks and hasn't been able to do so (I don't think he's a #2 ruck either, as he hasn't been able to find a niche anywhere else). Spencer is very raw. Even if you wanted to get rid of Jamar - and that's IMHO quite silly - why would we just delist him?

[MadAsHell 4,212]

I can't see us being overly active in trade week. If we're going to be moving up draft spots, teams aren't going to want our phlegm in return. A possibility if we were only looking to use 1, 2, 18 34 and PSD1, would be to trade 34 and 50 for 30 or something similar, to a team who wants to use a pick that late. It's not a massive return, but it could make a little something out of nothing for us. We end up with 1, 2, 18, 30 and PSD 1, while the other team ends up with 16, 34, 46 and 50 instead of 16, 30, 46 and 62. Just a hypothetical though. I've no idea who will even have those picks, likely Geelong or Collingwood.

I like your thinking. Moving up positions in the draft should be our only priority during trade week. I don't see the need for us to be looking for other players.

[MadAsHell 4,212]

So, say our 3rd round pick (e.g P34...) & one of those 4 players... for a P19?

It's a nice idea and I would love for it to happen, but could you honestly say that you'd be enticed by that if you're another team's list manager? I think we'd actually have to give up a player the other team could use instead of just our deadwood unfortunately...

Yeah I mentioned on another thread that would be nice if we could gradualy move our way up the draft table, but as you said would be difficult as other teams may not be enticed.

For example if all teams held their positions at the moment would be fantastic if we could do

Newton & pick 34 to Geelong for pick 32.

Bell & pick 32 to Adelaide for pick 27.

Johnson & pick 27 to Sydney for pick 24.

Buckley & pick 24 to North Melbourne for pick 21.

Would be fantstic but a long shot at the same time.

[e25 5]

I like your thinking. Moving up positions in the draft should be our only priority during trade week. I don't see the need for us to be looking for other players.

Except for the fact that other teams looking to trade with us would be hoping for exactly the same.

They are not going to come to us with the view to snatching our hapless full forward who can't get a game or our 3rd string ruckman in the bottom side.

Our most valuable commodity is draft picks and that is what other teams will be focusing on.

Any trade propositions would end in stalemates as they try to convince us to part with a pick.

[Rod Grinter Riot Squad 5,654]

Given the our likely priority pick coming soon we may have to make room for some new players, who would you get rid of, and how many?

Obviously there are a few players there that do not deserve to be even considered for delisting, but I thought I should throw them up anyway.

I have taken trading out as an option because that might allow us to free up some spots on the list, and therefore make this poll difficult to work out.

Bruce is coming out of contract and should be included in the options here.

[Bring-Back-Powell 14,833]

Bell, PJ and Newton are contracted next year.

Those 3 players are the exact definition of list cloggers.

Let's hope we trade these 3 for a packet of chips.

And the only way we'll delist Jamar is if we trade for an experienced ruckman in Charman or Seaby.

Edited August 12, 2009 by Bring-Back-Powell

[H_T 3,047]

I can't see us being overly active in trade week. If we're going to be moving up draft spots, teams aren't going to want our phlegm in return. A possibility if we were only looking to use 1, 2, 18 34 and PSD1, would be to trade 34 and 50 for 30 or something similar, to a team who wants to use a pick that late. It's not a massive return, but it could make a little something out of nothing for us. We end up with 1, 2, 18, 30 and PSD 1, while the other team ends up with 14, 34, 46 and 50 instead of 14, 30, 46 and 62. Just a hypothetical though. I've no idea who will even have those picks, likely the Dogs or Crows.

Not a bad scenario given who is out of contract and who is still under contract (ie. PJ, Newton, Bell). Unless they delist someone like Buckley, Picks 1,2,18,34 and PSD#1 could be the only picks meaning 5 changes - assuming there is no trades. Your idea of trading picks 34 and 50 for 30 is not a bad idea, and something similar has been done before.

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

First, you're assuming we're aiming to draft a ruckman, but I doubt we're going to draft a ruckman with one of our high picks. I'd rookie a ruckman, like I'd have done every year for quite a few now. Even if we do bring in some young rucks, they're likely to be years off the pace, aren't they? PJ and Meesen will be out of contract soon.

Second, Jamar's our number 1 ruckman by a long, long way. Meesen's only had people in raptures because he played okay when they thought he wasn't fit to play 2nds at my local Club. PJ's had plenty of opportunities to take the #1 ruck spot in a weak side without great ruck stocks and hasn't been able to do so (I don't think he's a #2 ruck either, as he hasn't been able to find a niche anywhere else). Spencer is very raw. Even if you wanted to get rid of Jamar - and that's IMHO quite silly - why would we just delist him?

Agree with all of that.

I reckon we are short a ruckman on our list. And given the lack of quality we lack about 2 good rucks to be optimal.

[beelzebub 23,376]

Im inclined to think we'll delist 6...possibly seven. makes way for 4 ( poss 5 , but doubtful given depth ) in draft... possibly a pickup in the PSD..and one or 2 rookies depending on PSD.

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

Bruce is coming out of contract and should be included in the options here.

Contract expires end of 2010.

And the only way we'll delist Jamar is if we trade for an experienced ruckman in Charman or Seaby.

I would hope we dont do either measure

[dee-luded 2,959]

I've picked 7 positions to clear .

Draft to Rnd 4, picks 1&2, 2ndRnd, 3rdRnd, 4thRnd. 5 draftees + 2 rookie elevations, McKenzie + Spencer.

That clears the rookie list of 2 spots & I think we need to clear a further 3 rookie spots.

5 rookies would be nice, especially with the thinning draft this year, because there may be some more speculative rookie picks.

[praha 11,240]

Robbo and Whelan are gone at the end of the year.

[dee-luded 2,959]

Bell, PJ and Newton are contracted next year.

Rhino, if you've recorded the contract status of the players, as you seem to have, you could be helpfull to your fellow Demonlanders by simply posting them. No need to hide them from us just to hit us with them at a later time. One good turn,,, & all that.

[IWAP 170]

I think we need 5 spots for drafting: ND 1,2,18,34 and PSD 1

And potentially upgrade Spencer, unless we can keep him as a 3rd year rookie

Does anyone know the rules for this?

My understanding is that if a club does not upgrade a rookie player to its senior list at the end of their second year, they are eligible for any club to be picked in the ND or PSD. If no club picks them up in these drafts, the club then has an option for them to be rookied for a 3rd year. This takes place after the PSD but before the rookie draft.

I am not sure about this, so would appreciate it if anyone could clarify it.

Edited August 12, 2009 by IWAP

[dee-luded 2,959]

Contract status taken from an old thread - updated Morton's but 2 others unknown and possibly some re-signings (Dunn and Moloney) since then.

Not necessarily correct...

Matthew Bate - October 2010

Daniel Bell - October 2010

Cameron Bruce - October 2010

Kyle Cheney - October 2009

Aaron Davey - October 2009

Lynden Dunn - ?

James Frawley - October 2010

Colin Garland - October 2010

Brad Green - October 2011

Jack Grimes - October 2009

Mark Jamar - October 2009

Paul Johnson - October 2010

Nathan Jones - October 2010

Addam Maric - October 2009

James McDonald - October 2009

Brock McLean - October 2009

Tom McNamara - October 2009

John Meesen - October 2009

Brad Miller - October 2009

Brent Moloney - ?

Cale Morton - October 2011

Michael Newton - October 2010

Ricky Petterd - October 2010

Russell Robertson - October 2009

Colin Sylvia - October 2009

Matthew Whelan - October 2009

Matthew Warnock ?

Jared Rivers ?

Austin Wonaeamirri ?

Stefan Martin ?

Clint Bartram ?

Simon Buckley ?

Paul Wheatley ?

Jack Watts ?

Liam Jurrah ?

Sam Blease ?

James Strauss ?

Neville Jetta ?

Jamie Bennell ?

Rohan Bail ?

Anyone else ?

Thanks CTD, I've started a file to record the contract status, it helps doesn't it to know this info. Cheers mate.

[Grimes_4_captain 0]

How bout we trade Bell, PJ and newton to collingwood for sum friday nite games? lol

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

Rhino, if you've recorded the contract status of the players, as you seem to have, you could be helpfull to your fellow Demonlanders by simply posting them. No need to hide them from us just to hit us with them at a later time. One good turn,,, & all that.

I havent. I am aware of some of the players disposition.

Mind you, nothing I have said is new. Its been stated a number of times on other threads by others in the know.

[dee-luded 2,959]

I havent. I am aware of some of the players disposition.

Mind you, nothing I have said is new. Its been stated a number of times on other threads by others in the know.

Yeah, thanks mate, I've got that above.

In the past you've seemed to be on the ball re contracts & that side of things, so I assumed you had them recorded. Thanks again.

[Doggo 32]

First, you're assuming we're aiming to draft a ruckman, but I doubt we're going to draft a ruckman with one of our high picks. I'd rookie a ruckman, like I'd have done every year for quite a few now. Even if we do bring in some young rucks, they're likely to be years off the pace, aren't they? PJ and Meesen will be out of contract soon.

Second, Jamar's our number 1 ruckman by a long, long way. Meesen's only had people in raptures because he played okay when they thought he wasn't fit to play 2nds at my local Club. PJ's had plenty of opportunities to take the #1 ruck spot in a weak side without great ruck stocks and hasn't been able to do so (I don't think he's a #2 ruck either, as he hasn't been able to find a niche anywhere else). Spencer is very raw. Even if you wanted to get rid of Jamar - and that's IMHO quite silly - why would we just delist him?

Spot on. There's room for one more on the rookie list IMO.

And potentially upgrade Spencer, unless we can keep him as a 3rd year rookie

Does anyone know the rules for this?

My understanding is that if a club does not upgrade a rookie player to its senior list at the end of their second year, they are eligible for any club to be picked in the ND or PSD. If no club picks them up in these drafts, the club then has an option for them to be rookied for a 3rd year. This takes place after the PSD but before the rookie draft.

I am not sure about this, so would appreciate it if anyone could clarify it.

I think you are correct.

I remember reading somewhere a long time ago that a player can be kept on the rookie list for a third season if they are from interstate? Being from QLD, that would mean Jake is eligible for one more year on the RL, if that indeed were correct.

That said, i believe/hope we'll be upgrading Jake and drafting another ruckman to the RL at season end. Chances are he'll be required for the #2 ruck role early next year, and is probably ahead of both PJ and Meesen for that spot, even at this early, raw, stage of his development.

[Scully The Tank Engine 0]

Yeah I mentioned on another thread that would be nice if we could gradualy move our way up the draft table, but as you said would be difficult as other teams may not be enticed.

For example if all teams held their positions at the moment would be fantastic if we could do

Newton & pick 34 to Geelong for pick 32.

Bell & pick 32 to Adelaide for pick 27.

Johnson & pick 27 to Sydney for pick 24.

Buckley & pick 24 to North Melbourne for pick 21.

Would be fantstic but a long shot at the same time.

ha ha..Some blockbuster deals there...

I really like your line of thinking, but essentially clubs would just laugh in our faces i think..

None of those players will add anything to any other list in the competion, maybe Buckley at a pinch. But the rest?? no way. It's just one more player you have to offload in a years time...

Admittedly, those 2nd round picks aren't exactly gold at this stage, I would still think we'd have to part with 'something' to entice an up-grade...

Perhaps Nathan Jones and pick 18 for pick 8??? I dunno...

[e25 5]

Does anyone know if we can demote a player like Newton to the Rookie List..?

hey, I can dream...

[dee-man 0]

I think we need 5 spots for drafting: ND 1,2,18,34 and PSD 1

And potentially upgrade Spencer, unless we can keep him as a 3rd year rookie

Does anyone know the rules for this?

My understanding is that if a club does not upgrade a rookie player to its senior list at the end of their second year, they are eligible for any club to be picked in the ND or PSD. If no club picks them up in these drafts, the club then has an option for them to be rookied for a 3rd year. This takes place after the PSD but before the rookie draft.

I am not sure about this, so would appreciate it if anyone could clarify it.

Yeah thats my understanding of the new rookie rules but im also not 100% sure,its just what ive heard