Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Just announced : the AFL has officially ruled the goal that was paid to Adelaide despite McVee’s efforts, WAS actually touched before crossing the line🤦‍♂️

 

Well it looked touched on the eastern wing at Adelaide Oval.

The goal umpires ruled it a point but for some reason four eyes in the bunker decided to get cute and over rule the goal umpires decision.

Does it really matter though? but we always seem to be on the end of theses bull tish calls.

And Marchbank finally comes clean and says he didn’t touch Petracca’s kick in 2023🤣

It didn’t cost us the Adelaide game, but the review system is [censored] embarrassing.

AFL would have to possess the worst system in world sport, NRL does it so much better.

 

wouldn't have changed the result, crows have been on the other end of about 6 of these that cost them the game in the past few years

21 minutes ago, jaydenh10 said:

wouldn't have changed the result, crows have been on the other end of about 6 of these that cost them the game in the past few years

Brave call, jh10!

If memory serves, the word is 'reasonable'.

To the naughty corner!

😁


Putting aside our dismal performance for the year but we have been on the end of some really poor umpiring decisions at critical moments

1 hour ago, Dee Zephyr said:

And Marchbank finally comes clean and says he didn’t touch Petracca’s kick in 2023🤣

It didn’t cost us the Adelaide game, but the review system is [censored] embarrassing.

AFL would have to possess the worst system in world sport, NRL does it so much better.

did he re Marchbank?

 
2 hours ago, joeboy said:

Just announced : the AFL has officially ruled the goal that was paid to Adelaide despite McVee’s efforts, WAS actually touched before crossing the line🤦‍♂️

Do we get a prize?

2 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

wouldn't have changed the result,

That we will never know...


all the nitwit commentators were saying it wasn't touched either accept jono brown

anyways, mistakes happen. i still reckon we are better off having a goal review rather than not

Good old sports entertainment hey? When did you last see a free paid against the Pies in the last 5 minutes of a close game? Best it's ever been.

So many manipulated results there's at least 30 games of no consequence in the last 7 rounds. All good though as Collingwood, Geelong and Hawthorn will make the prelims.

22 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Good old sports entertainment hey? When did you last see a free paid against the Pies in the last 5 minutes of a close game? Best it's ever been.

So many manipulated results there's at least 30 games of no consequence in the last 7 rounds. All good though as Collingwood, Geelong and Hawthorn will make the prelims.

add lions/gc to that

Could they also go back and rule on that 21 insufficient intent act by the crows where we.lost by a point?

Just for posterity.


12 hours ago, Phil C said:

Just get rid of it. It’s purely an excuse to advertise Crypto. Infuriating stuff.

I wish I'd bought some too.

Well it looked touched on the eastern wing at Adelaide Oval.

14 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

The goal umpires ruled it a point but for some reason four eyes in the bunker decided to get cute and over rule the goal umpires decision.

Does it really matter though? but we always seem to be on the end of theses bull tish calls.

Not sure it doesn't matter.

If we were closer players may have been more motivated.

What sort of review system takes a perfect umpires call and deems it wrong?

Edited by Previously known as LITD.

We have had too many poor decisions or non decisions in the last year or so. And we say nothing. Goodwin’s record would look better if he had spoken up LOUDLY. But no it’s just a job

7 hours ago, FireInTheBennelly said:

Did they announce what steps they're going to take to ensure it doesn't happen again? Or was it more of a 'soz, not soz'?

They're going to introduce a 'new' rule where if the ball is shown to be touched before crossing the line, or if it is unclear and the umpires initial call was touched, then the umpire's call remains.

Just to give clarity for the future.

17 hours ago, Dee Zephyr said:

And Marchbank finally comes clean and says he didn’t touch Petracca’s kick in 2023🤣

If ever there was a 'sliding doors' moment that was it.

We'd have ended the 2023 season 2nd, not 4th and played Lions in first final at the G and not Coll.

Evey chance we'd have beaten Lions then straight into a Preim and we'd still have Gus❤️💙.

Oh, what might have been🥹


1 hour ago, 640MD said:

We have had too many poor decisions or non decisions in the last year or so. And we say nothing. Goodwin’s record would look better if he had spoken up LOUDLY. But no it’s just a job

How do we know that the club says nothing? Even if Goody spoke ad nauseum in pressers about how the umps are cheats, all he would get is a significant fine, as opposed to the continual favourable treatment McRae and C Scott receive to overcompensate when something trivial goes against either of their teams.

15 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

How do we know that the club says nothing? Even if Goody spoke ad nauseum in pressers about how the umps are cheats, all he would get is a significant fine, as opposed to the continual favourable treatment McRae and C Scott receive to overcompensate when something trivial goes against either of their teams.

Dimma and Lyon are pretty good at it too.

1 hour ago, Little Goffy said:

They're going to introduce a 'new' rule where if the ball is shown to be touched before crossing the line, or if it is unclear and the umpires initial call was touched, then the umpire's call remains.

Just to give clarity for the future.

That doesn’t seem new to me. I thought that is how it always was interpreted.

 

Tell me something I dont know. I still havent recovered from that free not paid to Jim Stynes in the goal square. It was such a howler the umpire retired the next day.

18 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

did he re Marchbank?

Nah lol, just running with the shafted theme once again


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 15 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 0 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 13 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 196 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It's Game Day and Clarry's 200th game and for anyone who hates Carlton as much as I do this is our Grand Final. Go Dees.

      • Love
      • Like
    • 669 replies
  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies