Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
1 hour ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Wonder who GC paid to design the invisible logo on their guernsey?

Has to be the worst football jumper I've ever seen.

2 minutes ago, BoBo said:

Wait really? Mac Andrews is one of the highest paid defenders or players? Either is extremely surprising

Mac Andrew, a Gold Coast Suns AFL player, is reportedly set to earn $12 million over a nine-year deal, averaging $1.3 million annually. This contract is one of the largest in AFL history, surpassing even those of established stars like Lance Franklin. The deal also includes a potential extension that could see him play until 2034. 

Forgive that it's a question to Google

 
3 hours ago, GS_1905 said:

Real fizzer in Adelaide

Was there bad weather? Ridiculously low total score 86 points. Both bad? Both great defences?


1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

Richmond are no easy beats. Lots of effort.

Better they get it out of their system this week. I think Yze would have got them up against their former coach and departing players

If Gold Coast lose this, they'll have to expand their academy zone to Australia-wide.

 

Well the crowd may just be bigger next Thursday with both teams coming off a win.

Dimma would be going nuts.

A shame they will lose because it leaves the filth on top


More importantly what the fhk happened in those 2 games against Norf and GC especially?

ANZAC Eve is not a given against Richmond.

They are a decent side.

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges

5 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

Mac Andrew, a Gold Coast Suns AFL player, is reportedly set to earn $12 million over a nine-year deal, averaging $1.3 million annually. This contract is one of the largest in AFL history, surpassing even those of established stars like Lance Franklin. The deal also includes a potential extension that could see him play until 2034. 

Forgive that it's a question to Google

Hahaha, WTAF?

I mean, he’s played 40ish games, probably in the top, 20? 25? Maybe? Defenders in the league, so when you look at it like that, I guess it makes sense to give him millions of dollars a year for 9 years.

🫠🥴🫠🥴🫠🥴🫠🥴

This round has made me angry we lost to north and Gold Coast


14 minutes ago, roy11 said:

This round has made me angry we lost to north and Gold Coast

Yeah watching Richmond get the win & yze have a plan to beat them makes it more annoying that they thrashed us

Well done Yze. Hope you keep doing well

not next week but


Will need to play well Thursday night, Tigers will be hard at it

Crowd Numbers have just gone up 30,000 i reckon 😊

10 hours ago, GS_1905 said:

Their young team will struggle on a 5 day break.

We have lost all our lst quarters, we will see.

 

the betting odds for a Tigers win against GC were too good to be true. Don't normally bet, but something told me Yze would get them up for this, so had a dip. Happy man this morning.

12 hours ago, BoBo said:

Hahaha, WTAF?

I mean, he’s played 40ish games, probably in the top, 20? 25? Maybe? Defenders in the league, so when you look at it like that, I guess it makes sense to give him millions of dollars a year for 9 years.

🫠🥴🫠🥴🫠🥴🫠🥴

Seems to be the way things are going.

Just need to be linked to other sides/go Home factor, be in the middle of contract negotiations, and then have one or two “breakout” games.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies