Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Macca said:

We've got too many good players to just bottom out.

I don't think we do. Also, no point being good if you're being asked to play a game style that you're not good at.

Key position forward situation is beyond chronic, we have no-one reliable, no-one even experienced. And it's not just that no-one can take a mark I50, it's as much that no-one can even make a contest - so the ball just ping pongs out again.

 
2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

I don't think we do. Also, no point being good if you're being asked to play a game style that you're not good at.

Key position forward situation is beyond chronic, we have no-one reliable, no-one even experienced. And it's not just that no-one can take a mark I50, it's as much that no-one can even make a contest - so the ball just ping pongs out again.

You're probably right Mr Crosby but sooner or later most of our best players will have a good game on the same day

A redemption or personal pride game?

So class might win out as it often happens when an older horse has a day out at the races

Anyway, I'm obviously putting a positive spin on things (being a realist can be a bit 'meh' sometimes 😄)

6 hours ago, SthSea22 said:

HF - Pickett, Johnson, Turner

F - Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler

JOHNSON?????? Nup not up to AFL standard!

 
45 minutes ago, picket fence said:

JOHNSON?????? Nup not up to AFL standard!

Neither is Rooh at the moment though Mr Fence. I'd rather have AJ at CHF than a picket, Spargo, Chandler or Tracc.

We need a big bodied second tall in that position, even if it's just to crash packs get the ball to ground and compete / hold up until the small brigade arrives.

At the moment we are a non event in terms of presenting anything that threatens to damage the oppo back 6. They're having a picnic pretty much every time now in the air and at ground level.

Koz playing serious mid minutes is great but then we also lose his impact i50. Major conundrum there.

Roll the dice and bring in Brown dog and at least trial him through the middle for Vines over the next three to four weeks. If that works we might free up Koz to play a bit more forward and impact the scoreboard.

Can't be any worse than the recent tripe we've been dishing up surely?

We probably still lose but look a tad more respectable and start providing the ever elusive tonic for the playing group.... Hope! And who knows, maybe a tiny bit of confidence begins to creep in.


A few here have acknowledged how much we are fumbling. And it's right across the board

A sure-fire reason that we lack confidence

And fumbling often results in a rebound score

Of all the stats we digest, fumbling or turnovers can be, and often are, extremely costly. It mirrors soccer in many ways

‪Spargo. V Essendon.

12 possessions. 5 turnovers. 4 missed tackles. 1 tackle. 95 minutes.

One good kick to Petty after running 24 metres without a bounce.

Nearly killed Ed Langdon with a hospital pass.

Pathetic again. Gifted games. Why is he always Goodys favourite one? Madness. Must be dropped. Has done nothing to warrant a game.

This typifies Goodys poor selection and bias.

55 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

‪Spargo. V Essendon.

12 possessions. 5 turnovers. 4 missed tackles. 1 tackle. 95 minutes.

One good kick to Petty after running 24 metres without a bounce.

Nearly killed Ed Langdon with a hospital pass.

Pathetic again. Gifted games. Why is he always Goodys favourite one? Madness. Must be dropped. Has done nothing to warrant a game.

This typifies Goodys poor selection and bias.

Would rather see Kynan Brown or Bowey in that role now Juddy is back

 
11 hours ago, 48 Year Now said:

A reasonable case can be made for dropping each one.

Henderson, go and work on this. Reasonable start to your career.

Sparrow, go and accumulate kicks in the same role

Petty, just a weeks rest if you fix a few things

Melksham, practice a few of your tricks to get back to your best.

I don’t see it as punishment or anything other than you are not quite where we want / need you to be.

I am sure I’m not alone. In my limited career I was made 19th man in a junior final. One guy didn’t turn up and I got a second chance. I played one of the best games I ever played as I wanted to show my teammates and coach he should t have dropped me.

Simple phycology

I was at that match. You were awesome !!

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

‪Spargo. V Essendon.

12 possessions. 5 turnovers. 4 missed tackles. 1 tackle. 95 minutes.

One good kick to Petty after running 24 metres without a bounce.

Nearly killed Ed Langdon with a hospital pass.

Pathetic again. Gifted games. Why is he always Goodys favourite one? Madness. Must be dropped. Has done nothing to warrant a game.

This typifies Goodys poor selection and bias.

Agree adds zero, slow plodder, would struggle to get a game with a bottom 4 club...... oh wait!


4 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

‪Spargo. V Essendon.

12 possessions. 5 turnovers. 4 missed tackles. 1 tackle. 95 minutes.

One good kick to Petty after running 24 metres without a bounce.

Nearly killed Ed Langdon with a hospital pass.

Pathetic again. Gifted games. Why is he always Goodys favourite one? Madness. Must be dropped. Has done nothing to warrant a game.

This typifies Goodys poor selection and bias.

Firstly, selection is done by a committee, not just Goodwin. Secondly, when you look at stats like Pressure Acts Spargo was 6th against Essendon.

Not all that hard to see why the selectors want him in the team. If you look.

I watched at summer training the forward coaching that Chappy did with interest. All of his positioning and pattern work is nowhere to be seen. They have completely gone into panic mode and are not doing what they were taught over the off season. In particular, the lead ups, the use of small forwards to rove contexts etc.

When what you learn is not followed, all we have is the old forward panic stations. God help us…..

10 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

‪Spargo. V Essendon.

Gifted games. Why is he always Goodys favourite one? Madness.

Or Kompromat?

I jest

1 hour ago, buck_nekkid said:

I watched at summer training the forward coaching that Chappy did with interest. All of his positioning and pattern work is nowhere to be seen. They have completely gone into panic mode and are not doing what they were taught over the off season. In particular, the lead ups, the use of small forwards to rove contexts etc.

When what you learn is not followed, all we have is the old forward panic stations. God help us…..

So that is on the coaches to continue to drill it in, or drop players not adhering to team plans.

I guess it's hard to drop 23 players.... but they need to change something up in that forward line!

14 hours ago, picket fence said:

JOHNSON?????? Nup not up to AFL standard!

Take the 2nd ruck spot

Fullerton seems to be blacklisted so AJ is the next option


2 hours ago, buck_nekkid said:

I watched at summer training the forward coaching that Chappy did with interest. All of his positioning and pattern work is nowhere to be seen. They have completely gone into panic mode and are not doing what they were taught over the off season. In particular, the lead ups, the use of small forwards to rove contexts etc.

When what you learn is not followed, all we have is the old forward panic stations. God help us…..

Thanks for the insight.

My thoughts are, in the first round we had 3 tall fwds and their work was quite good. Since then we haven't had three and they've been changed every week. So no consistency or understanding among the fwds.

Last week we had one tall fwd who also rucked.

Reckon it is pretty difficult to follow training if the players who trained together aren't there.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

1 hour ago, Hellfire Dub said:

Or Kompromat?

I jest

"Give me back the phone"

fa69171f-873b-4207-afe6-dacbc9b60672_rwc_100x0x409x320x409.gif

1 hour ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

So that is on the coaches to continue to drill it in, or drop players not adhering to team plans.

I guess it's hard to drop 23 players.... but they need to change something up in that forward line!

Forward Strategy .....

200w (3).gif

8 hours ago, bing181 said:

Firstly, selection is done by a committee, not just Goodwin. Secondly, when you look at stats like Pressure Acts Spargo was 6th against Essendon.

Not all that hard to see why the selectors want him in the team. If you look.

Pressure acts should be a non-negotiable for all players, but particularly for small forwards. You don't get extra credit for doing the bare essentials of your job, when you contribute nothing else (goals, assists, tackles, etc). It isn't just Spargo, but he is a forward who hasn't kicked a goal since July 2023 - that's a long time ago.

With McVee returning I would assume that sees Rivers return to the midfield and Salem being able to push up the ground more. Still missing Lever obviously and an underdone May... structurally we are struggling as well.


The main thing I noticed at last week's game was our poor skill execution and decision-making.

Kozzie missed a simple kick to Fritsch in the first quarter under no pressure, Trac constantly missed kicks, and we constantly kicked to the disadvantage of a teammate or an outnumber.

Essendon also kicked two forward 50 stoppage goals because Max hit the ball to their attacking side or flipped it over the back rather than hit it to our defensive side. Why, I have no idea, but our players weren't there, and theirs simply said "thanks" and kicked the goal.

So frustrating to watch. It was like watching an amateur league side from a skills and decision-making perspective.

4 hours ago, SthSea22 said:

Take the 2nd ruck spot

Fullerton seems to be blacklisted so AJ is the next option

Agree to the extent one of them has to play each week and develop a role. I think they should be judged together with Gawn as a rucking forward duo rather than as an individual and secondary role. They are there as support to get the best out of Max and keep him from being battered. First sign of a opposing ruck getting rough, bring on the second ruck which needs to be Johnson or Campbell when fit.

13 minutes ago, 48 Year Now said:

Agree to the extent one of them has to play each week and develop a role. I think they should be judged together with Gawn as a rucking forward duo rather than as an individual and secondary role. They are there as support to get the best out of Max and keep him from being battered. First sign of a opposing ruck getting rough, bring on the second ruck which needs to be Johnson or Campbell when fit.

100%

Just think AJ has the angro and body to crash and bash

Roo needs to sit in the square

HF - Pickett, Jefferson/Turner, Chandler

F - Fritsch, van Rooyen/AJ, Tholtrup

Edited by SthSea22

 

Honestly, the club has sapped the energy out of me, so the only thing I have going for me right now is that I leave for Europe after the Easter weekend for the tennis clay court season.

Will still go out of my way to watch us, but I can’t believe it is round 6 and it’s already season over. Still yet to fully sink in.

We were top 4 last year when they smashed us by 90 odd and even when we were good, we still struggled against them. It is arguable that the loss in the Alice started this free fall.

God help us..

Edited by VNightCityLegend

18 minutes ago, VNightCityLegend said:

God help us..

Ain't gunna help us, bats for the other side 😉

Good luck and safe travels. Rest assured we all feel the same pain.

🤔 think I'd rather be winging my way to Europe than having to see out the season here.

🍻🍸🥂🎾🏆


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 39 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 257 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies