We could easily win the next 4 games.

29 minutes ago, bluey said:

We could easily win the next 4 games.

Fixed it for you.

We could.

We won't.

And I'd argue we're more likely to lose the next 4 than win them.

FWIW, even if there's an argument that we can lift and beat Essendon, Richmond and/or West Coast, we can't beat Fremantle even when we're good. The way they're playing today against the Dogs, I would rate our chance of beating them at about 0.5%.

We could beat the bombers, they’re as dysfunctional as us. Tiges have a bit more go about them than we’ve shown so I’d tip them but they’re gettable. Eagles are pus so if we drop that one it’s official the players have given up. Freo will beat us, they always do.

2 minutes ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

We could beat the bombers, they’re as dysfunctional as us. Tiges have a bit more go about them than we’ve shown so I’d tip them but they’re gettable. Eagles are pus so if we drop that one it’s official the players have given up. Freo will beat us, they always do.

I don't have any confidence, the way we're playing, about Essendon. They can't defend, sure, but neither can North. It didn't matter for North because we can't score so we can't take advantage of it. Meanwhile we're so poor at defending transition that if Essendon get their ball movement going, they have enough weaponry.

I’d tip the bombers, can’t beat anyone kicking 6 goals. But we’re a chance

On 04/04/2025 at 22:27, Return to Glory said:

JVR doesn't want for effort. But he's playing so poorly, he may be better served playing down back during a game. May be a 'rob Peter to pay Paul' but at least it would get rid of Harry the Heartbreaker. I'm not sure I want to see him in the team again. A performance without any redeeming qualities. Does not appear to give a s h i t.

On 04/04/2025 at 22:29, watchtheeyes said:

I hate using this expression, but Petty is soft. Doesn’t want it, doesn’t want the contest.

Can’t play again.

JVR playing young… immature tactically, immature physically.

In the last quarter Geelong were kicking the ball out of their defensive 50 and it was going to Gawn 1 on 1. JVR sprinted across and chopped Gawn’s arms in what would have been a mark. Went to ground, and his opponent went off with it - goal.

Max stood there looking [censored] off (not aggressive) and waited for JVR to walk up to him to share some water. Gave him a pat on the head but it showed me: 1) they’re playing a very low confidence and selfish type of footy, 2) we don’t know the basic skills of blocking players, 3) good leadership from Gawn to not lose it but once in a while they need a spray.

20 hours ago, Mike said:

It just all feels a bit sad really. This team is a shell of what it used to be. Not sure where we go from here.

Goody keeps talking about the band being back together. Feels like the band has stayed together for one too many albums.

Petty...out not up to AFL...soft..slow..trade him out

JVR..out..not up to AFL..is a real stiff...unless he stars in VFL, trade him out to Perth

Spargo....1 touch very dubious another chance must start the game

Sharp...out....not doing it yet.. needs to star in VFL

Henderson....marrieds to lift in VFL..out

Rivers...out....needs to regain form in VFL

5 outs

5 ins

Fullerton..in

Lever...in

MacVee..in

Jefferson ..in

Lindsey.in

Why didn't Langford start in Round 1

Performed well in North practice game

That was a bad, bad decision..He's in and we win that one and he plays Rnd 2

Starts Rd3 and cleans up

Whoever is responsible for that decision needs to be shown the door forthwith.

4 hours ago, Deemania since 56 said:

This has to be recognised; it is not a petulant response, Tracca is seriously compromised by this team performance. How much more is he expected to contribute to the Club ... it seems that only the fans are sensitive to his needs.

Said for ages... said this before his injury... the guy has an ego... that's fine. He has expectations of himself, that's to be lauded. He has expectations of his team mates and the team.as a whole because he goes out to play.

Imagine going to work and your boss is 'stuck in the mud' nice guy. Nice, but ineffective. You go to work and your team mates are either 1st year apprentices or well meaning desk bunnies.

He's had enough of this stupidity..... haven't we all !!

7 hours ago, Hellaintabadplacetobe said:

Max Holmes comments says it all and he's not wrong. " They don't really know what they're doing".

I agree Max

Is that right? Where was that said?

1 minute ago, Superunknown said:

Is that right? Where was that said?

He said it, but in relation specifically to tagging. In a post-game interview on radio.

It was the standard Geelong disrespect, but it's correct. We should know how to tag, but we don't, and running a half-forward up to tag without replacing him was moronic.

14 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

Is that right? Where was that said?

See 19:46

43 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

He said it, but in relation specifically to tagging. In a post-game interview on radio.

It was the standard Geelong disrespect, but it's correct. We should know how to tag, but we don't, and running a half-forward up to tag without replacing him was moronic.

Slap downs are ok, it shows we have work to do

Wouldn’t have said that in 21

We’re totally stuffed

Anyone else watch first crack? A few things of note

1) The behind the goals vision of the first centre bounce where Sparrow goes up to Holmes the other forwards are pointing and got the arms out stretched asking what's going on/who's playing on Humphries? This is damning and I just can't believe they wouldn't have been on the same page as the coaches. Is this why the likes of Petracca were so frustrated?

2) Montagna believes Goodwin/the coaching staff should put their hand up internally and say they got the Holmes tag wrong.

3) King on the other hand reckons that even if our forwards had 6v6 we still wouldn't have scored because they're so poor at contest, hence he could see why Goodwin would throw someone extra at stoppage to help limit the damage and keep us in the game for longer. He put the onus on the likes of Oliver and Viney to get the ball outside instead of throwing it onto the boot and to use the extra at stoppage to get some run and carry to get it over Geelong's extra in defence. He also said Viney is self destructive to Melbourne's midfield.

Interesting viewing.

Edited 23 hours ago23 hr by At the break of Gawn

I

8 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Anyone else watch first crack? A few things of note

1) The behind the goals vision of the first centre bounce where Sparrow goes up to Holmes the other forwards are pointing and got the arms out stretched asking what's going on/who's playing on Humphries? This is damning and I just can't believe they wouldn't have been on the same page as the coaches. Is this why the likes of Petracca were so frustrated?

2) Montagna believes Goodwin/the coaching staff should put their hand up internally and say they got the Holmes tag wrong.

3) King on the other hand reckons that even if our forwards had 6v6 we still wouldn't have scored because they're so poor at contest, hence he could see why Goodwin would throw someone extra at stoppage to help limit the damage and keep us in the game for longer. He put the onus on the likes of Oliver and Viney to get the ball outside instead of throwing it onto the boot and to use the extra at stoppage to get some run and carry to get it over Geelong's extra in defence. He also said Viney is self destructive to Melbourne's midfield.

Interesting viewing.

Ultimately our lack of solving the forward line issues whether it’s personnel or connection. It has finally caught up to us.

The media have found extra footage of trac getting frustrated after the siren & chucking his mouth guard.

They are obsessed with trying to make it into a bigger story than it needs to be. We all know he's frustrated.

10 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

He said it, but in relation specifically to tagging. In a post-game interview on radio.

It was the standard Geelong disrespect, but it's correct. We should know how to tag, but we don't, and running a half-forward up to tag without replacing him was moronic.

Tbh it's irrelevant whether disrespectful or not. For mine it was just a matter-of-fact comment. Literally..relating to a matter of FACT ... that being we don't know what we're doing. That comes from the top down.

EVERYONE is seeing this now. The Elephant in the room for many is Simon's termination date. No longer an IF for many.... but when .

We play like we're robbing Peter to pay Paul, running around clueless like headless chooks trying to put a finger in the dyke. (I'm sure I could garble upmore metaphors but that will suffice )

I think the only reason much of the media aren't slicing us up like a Tepanyaki Chef is many are in a state of semi disbelief, as opposed to semi-denial ( more the preserve of many Melbourne supporters ), that this team, once competitive , are just a total mess.

9 hours ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Anyone else watch first crack? A few things of note

1) The behind the goals vision of the first centre bounce where Sparrow goes up to Holmes the other forwards are pointing and got the arms out stretched asking what's going on/who's playing on Humphries? This is damning and I just can't believe they wouldn't have been on the same page as the coaches. Is this why the likes of Petracca were so frustrated?

2) Montagna believes Goodwin/the coaching staff should put their hand up internally and say they got the Holmes tag wrong.

3) King on the other hand reckons that even if our forwards had 6v6 we still wouldn't have scored because they're so poor at contest, hence he could see why Goodwin would throw someone extra at stoppage to help limit the damage and keep us in the game for longer. He put the onus on the likes of Oliver and Viney to get the ball outside instead of throwing it onto the boot and to use the extra at stoppage to get some run and carry to get it over Geelong's extra in defence. He also said Viney is self destructive to Melbourne's midfield.

Interesting viewing.

Haven’t seen the segment het, but that’s true, and our forwards were asking what was going on at that first bounce, that’s incredible. I can’t think of an explanation for that which doesn’t reflect awfully on the coaches. We either enacted a plan which we failed to properly explain, or we failed to address a mistake (no one covering Sparrow in the forward line) and then left it and allowed it to destroy us.

At the game It was as though Geelong were able to create a spare in nearly every area of the ground. Even deep in their forward line. I’m guessing sparrows positional apponent just follows the ball around, especially once they got the ball past centre.

Also Max for instance would run back to defence rather than forward, especially the first quarter.

And with Trac, I think people are hoping he bleeds red and blue, and his frustrations are for the team. My take is for most of last year he wanted out, I can’t see that changing so why wouldn’t his frustrations be “Why wouldn’t they let me leave, this situation is ducked”

12 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

He said it, but in relation specifically to tagging. In a post-game interview on radio.

It was the standard Geelong disrespect, but it's correct. We should know how to tag, but we don't, and running a half-forward up to tag without replacing him was moronic.

I'd say Scott made it pretty clear the whole club was laughing at our coaches. We were flat out embarrassed. The fact an opposition coach and player would ridicule us should see us breathing fire but can we even do that?

14 hours ago, TheWiz said:

In the last quarter Geelong were kicking the ball out of their defensive 50 and it was going to Gawn 1 on 1. JVR sprinted across and chopped Gawn’s arms in what would have been a mark. Went to ground, and his opponent went off with it - goal.

Max stood there looking [censored] off (not aggressive) and waited for JVR to walk up to him to share some water. Gave him a pat on the head but it showed me: 1) they’re playing a very low confidence and selfish type of footy, 2) we don’t know the basic skills of blocking players, 3) good leadership from Gawn to not lose it but once in a while they need a spray.

Very true The Wiz. You're probably the voice of reason here, but in respect to Petty I'm struggling.

On 05/04/2025 at 18:59, Bring-Back-Powell said:

One negative which can actually turn into a positive is Fritta and Kozzie kicking 0.6 between them. Kick 4.2 instead of 0.6 and we’re losing by 17 points in a highly respectable loss. And let’s face it some of those misses both boys eat for breakfast normally.

We could have lost by 17 points. thats the saddest thing I've read.

We need to find a way to beat Essendon. I dont care how.

I'm not putting up with Essendon fans beating us and then gloating over the 1st rounder they have from us. No way, no how.

33 minutes ago, Bay Riffin said:

We could have lost by 17 points. thats the saddest thing I've read.

Yes it is. That's how far we've fallen as a footy side.

But that doesn't change the fact that Kozzie and Fritta aren't kicking 0.6 between them every week. If they kick 4.2 next week between them we might actually win against a lesser opponent or go very close.

Saw Richmond live on Saturday - id say they start faves against us. Quality is lacking in spots as you would expect however they are playing as a connected unit and work in unison.