Jump to content

Featured Replies

Doggies played extra well ... that's a good win with great fighting qualities

As for the Blues, they don't handle pressure very well at all. They go quiet

 

Question:

What's better than the blues getting beaten and going down 0-3?

Answer:

Backing their opponent to win.

Edited by binman

 
2 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Drinks ready. You have to take a shot whenever the “Brave Blues” are mentioned.

I have a cheeky Pinot Gris that should do the trick!!!! ,(I'm going to drink it even if brave Bs isn't mentioned)!!!


4 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

Decent last quarter to tune in and watch.

Lingering thought is that I hope hope hope Kalani White can be our Sam Darcy in a few years.

I'll be happy if he is 3/4 as good.

After watching Davidson tonight i reckon we need to get Mentha in asap.

One more game at Casey should be enough. Subject to playing his role and performing well anyway.

 

Just had a peek at the ladder.

We better win, cause if we lose I advise everyone belonging to the MFCSS committee to chuck a few bucks on a Freo Eagles draw.

Edited by Dee Zephyr


9 hours ago, Macca said:

How about Geelong?

40,000 capacity at CatPark but only 25k for the Freo game

Pathetic

Did Caro or Dwayne mention it?


1 hour ago, Macca said:

Doggies played extra well ... that's a good win with great fighting qualities

As for the Blues, they don't handle pressure very well at all. They go quiet

I feel like it hasn’t been mentioned in the north game thread (unless I missed it), but same as us now, they don’t have a Nibbler or Gus type player that interrupts the tide from rolling against them.

Their baseline of effort was they did the grunt work like running their heart out to get into space to be an option, applying immense pressure on an opponent or ensuring they win contests when it matters, consistently.

No dropping of heads, just getting the basics done.

Which is more about setting an example of work rate and effort when things get tough to inspire other players, than it is about going for glory. They set standards for other players to follow suit to ensure a team performance.

Our capitulation against North was evidence of a lack of this standard being displayed on field (IMO) which also applies to Carlton.


3 minutes ago, BoBo said:

I feel like it hasn’t been mentioned in the north game thread (unless I missed it), but same as us now, they don’t have a Nibbler or Gus type player that interrupts the tide from rolling against them.

Their baseline of effort was they did the grunt work like running their heart out to get into space to be an option, applying immense pressure on an opponent or ensuring they win contests when it matters, consistently.

No dropping of heads, just getting the basics done.

Which is more about setting an example of work rate and effort when things get tough to inspire other players, than it is about going for glory. They set standards for other players to follow suit to ensure a team performance.

Our capitulation against North was evidence of a lack of this standard being displayed on field (IMO) which also applies to Carlton.

I don't quite know where we sit right now because if we are trying to change how our offense goes about it, we are at the very least, a work in progress

Requires a buy-in from every player and that's not an easy thing to do. We need to get back to playing as a team

We live in hope

As for Carlton, when opposition teams up the ante, they consistently go missing. It's like they are all looking around for someone else to lead the way

Where as the Doggies tonight were all about total team and getting the job done

When the game was there to be won, the Bulldogs stood up whilst the Blues looked on

As for the pressure meter on any given coach, the heat is going to be applied to Voss way more than Goodwin

If the Blues lose to Collingwood next Thursday, it will be on for young and old at Princes Park

Mind you, North lost their first 4 games in 1975 and were 3 & 6 after round 9 but then went on to win the flag that year

9 hours ago, doc roet said:

Libba would have to be first called for a new series of the sopranos

…. or Borat?

 
8 hours ago, Demonland said:

Nice stat. Then again St Kilda's recent years have been woeful and Carlton had 4 years where you could pencil in powerhouse Richmond beating them.

7 hours ago, Macca said:

I don't quite know where we sit right now because if we are trying to change how our offense goes about it, we are at the very least, a work in progress

Requires a buy-in from every player and that's not an easy thing to do. We need to get back to playing as a team

We live in hope

As for Carlton, when opposition teams up the ante, they consistently go missing. It's like they are all looking around for someone else to lead the way

Where as the Doggies tonight were all about total team and getting the job done

When the game was there to be won, the Bulldogs stood up whilst the Blues looked on

It's easy to forget that winning creates confidence and that losing saps it and often extends winning or losing streaks. Hawthorn and Lions expect to win while Carlton and our Dees almost feel like they'll lose, especially when the other side is coming in the last quarter. The one up side is that things can change fairly quickly. A year ago Hawks were tripping over their shadows.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Adelaide

    The atmosphere at the Melbourne Football Club at the beginning of the season was aspirational following an injury-plagued year in 2024. Coach Simon Goodwin had lofty expectations with the return of key players, the anticipated improvement from a maturing group with a few years of experience under their belts, and some exceptional young talent also joining the ranks. All of that went by the wayside as the team failed to click into action early on. It rallied briefly with a new strategy but has fallen again with five more  consecutive defeats. 

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

    • 93 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Like
    • 241 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 23 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kysaiah Pickett and Clayton Oliver. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 27 replies