Gawn - dominated in middle

Salem - has regained composure 

Sparrow - enjoyed the conditions 

Lindsay - found a bewdy 

Petracca - classy and exciting 

Langdon - excellent running game

Viney - prolific and impressive 

Bowey - not always convincing 

Oliver - unselfish and committed 

Petty - impressive all game

Lever - safe and reliable 

Rivers - had little influence 

Windsor - some exciting cameos

Chandler - was rarely sighted

McDonald - a valuable replacement 

Sharp - pace was valuable 

Fritsch - had little involvement 

Henderson - some nice touches 

Johnson - tried but lacking

Howes - out of depth 

Van Rooyen - seemed totally lost 

Langford - limited game time 

Jefferson - must persevere with

 

 

Edited March 16Mar 16 by joeboy

FUUUUUUCKKKKKKK

Jefferson?

22 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated in middle

Salem - has regained composure 

Sparrow - enjoyed the conditions 

Lindsay - found a bewdy 

Petracca - classy and exciting 

Langdon - excellent running game

Viney - prolific and impressive 

Bowey - not always convincing 

Oliver - unselfish and committed 

Petty - impressive all game

Lever - safe and reliable 

Rivers - had little influence 

Windsor - some exciting cameos

Chandler - was rarely sighted

McDonald - a valuable replacement 

Sharp - pace was valuable 

Fritsch - had little involvement 

Henderson - some nice touches 

Johnson - tried but lacking

Howes - out of depth 

Van Rooyen - seemed totally lost 

Langford - limited game time 

 

 

I'm over Chandler.

4 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

I'm over Chandler.

Who would be the best replacement?

 🙈 🙉 🙊 

Edited March 16Mar 16 by Tarax Club

3 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Who would be the best replacement?

In my view, Langford should have started, not be sub.

Bowey - impressive all game

19 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Who would be the best replacement?

I think that's the problem.

22 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Who would be the best replacement?

That Kossi bloke is not too bad.

Langdon had five second half possessions with 1 tackle. Went missing big time.

1 minute ago, leave it to deever said:

I think that's the problem.

Our lack of quality smalls and theirs being so good really stood out today.

Tom McDonald - Best on Ground 

1 hour ago, joeboy said:

Johnson - tried but lacking

A bit tough I think, I thought he was very competitive and strong in the contest. Pretty good for mature recruit, never played at the level

Henderson also looked comfortable with the pace of the game

Lindsay looks swift and classy! Thought I was watching a Febey ♥️💙

1 hour ago, chook fowler said:

Bowey - impressive all game

If it weren’t for Coniglio. 😪

55 minutes ago, Heart Beats True said:

Langdon had five second half possessions with 1 tackle. Went missing big time.

Also gave 2 goals away in the first half through lazy kicks...going backwards no less

I heard the ABC call for the first half and watched mist of the second half.

i think I agree Chandler, Howes and Fritta

should be embarrassed to take the coin for this week and be nervous about next week’s. 
and I think the AFL and their round zero can shove that idea where the sun does not shine.

we did well but not well enough 

4 hours ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated in middle

Salem - has regained composure 

Sparrow - enjoyed the conditions 

Lindsay - found a bewdy 

Petracca - classy and exciting 

Langdon - excellent running game

Viney - prolific and impressive 

Bowey - not always convincing 

Oliver - unselfish and committed 

Petty - impressive all game

Lever - safe and reliable 

Rivers - had little influence 

Windsor - some exciting cameos

Chandler - was rarely sighted

McDonald - a valuable replacement 

Sharp - pace was valuable 

Fritsch - had little involvement 

Henderson - some nice touches 

Johnson - tried but lacking

Howes - out of depth 

Van Rooyen - seemed totally lost 

Langford - limited game time 

Jefferson - must persevere with

 

 

Fritsch out Turner in, and put May at FF

Chandler out Spargo in

I was at the G and kept a close eye on Fritsch for most of the game.

Whilst he was far from his best and didn't trouble the scorers, I was encouraged by him getting a lot more involved in the sleeves up, second & third effort type stuff, rather than his more typical floating around the fringes waiting for someone to get it to him. 

If he isn't getting points on the board I at least want him putting heat on the opposition defenders so someone else potentially can.

To my eye, he did that job pretty well.

How much credit does Fritsch have in the bank after his Grand Final success?

At what stage can we say that his performances just aren’t worthy of automatic selection?

15 minutes ago, joeboy said:

How much credit does Fritsch have in the bank after his Grand Final success?

At what stage can we say that his performances just aren’t worthy of automatic selection?

Carefull....

At times he looked sore and at one stage he couldnt run but in aswer to the question probably by round 4.  Still, who comes in?

1 hour ago, joeboy said:

How much credit does Fritsch have in the bank after his Grand Final success?

At what stage can we say that his performances just aren’t worthy of automatic selection?

I agree

He showed no interest at all getting himself into the game

Fortunately for him, we don't have a replacement

19 hours ago, Dave1711 said:

Fritsch out Turner in, and put May at FF

Chandler out Spargo in

3 in and 2 out. That should help us win.

23 hours ago, chook fowler said:

Bowey - impressive all game

Yes Chook, I felt that Bowey was impressive across the game, not necessarily all game - but it was great to see him more active and inventive with his kicking skills, accuracy and tenacity in winning the ball on occasion. He can only put these experiences in the bank, work on these, become (once again) a really good clearing backman. I'd hope that the return of Judd will add to his capacities etc.

23 hours ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Who would be the best replacement?

Spargo