Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Gawn - dominated in middle

Salem - has regained composure 

Sparrow - enjoyed the conditions 

Lindsay - found a bewdy 

Petracca - classy and exciting 

Langdon - excellent running game

Viney - prolific and impressive 

Bowey - not always convincing 

Oliver - unselfish and committed 

Petty - impressive all game

Lever - safe and reliable 

Rivers - had little influence 

Windsor - some exciting cameos

Chandler - was rarely sighted

McDonald - a valuable replacement 

Sharp - pace was valuable 

Fritsch - had little involvement 

Henderson - some nice touches 

Johnson - tried but lacking

Howes - out of depth 

Van Rooyen - seemed totally lost 

Langford - limited game time 

Jefferson - must persevere with

 

 

Edited by joeboy

 
 
22 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated in middle

Salem - has regained composure 

Sparrow - enjoyed the conditions 

Lindsay - found a bewdy 

Petracca - classy and exciting 

Langdon - excellent running game

Viney - prolific and impressive 

Bowey - not always convincing 

Oliver - unselfish and committed 

Petty - impressive all game

Lever - safe and reliable 

Rivers - had little influence 

Windsor - some exciting cameos

Chandler - was rarely sighted

McDonald - a valuable replacement 

Sharp - pace was valuable 

Fritsch - had little involvement 

Henderson - some nice touches 

Johnson - tried but lacking

Howes - out of depth 

Van Rooyen - seemed totally lost 

Langford - limited game time 

 

 

I'm over Chandler.

4 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

I'm over Chandler.

Who would be the best replacement?


 🙈 🙉 🙊 

Edited by Tarax Club

 
22 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Who would be the best replacement?

That Kossi bloke is not too bad.


Langdon had five second half possessions with 1 tackle. Went missing big time.

1 minute ago, leave it to deever said:

I think that's the problem.

Our lack of quality smalls and theirs being so good really stood out today.

Tom McDonald - Best on Ground 

1 hour ago, joeboy said:

Johnson - tried but lacking

A bit tough I think, I thought he was very competitive and strong in the contest. Pretty good for mature recruit, never played at the level

Henderson also looked comfortable with the pace of the game

Lindsay looks swift and classy! Thought I was watching a Febey ♥️💙


55 minutes ago, Heart Beats True said:

Langdon had five second half possessions with 1 tackle. Went missing big time.

Also gave 2 goals away in the first half through lazy kicks...going backwards no less

I heard the ABC call for the first half and watched mist of the second half.

i think I agree Chandler, Howes and Fritta

should be embarrassed to take the coin for this week and be nervous about next week’s. 
and I think the AFL and their round zero can shove that idea where the sun does not shine.

we did well but not well enough 

4 hours ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated in middle

Salem - has regained composure 

Sparrow - enjoyed the conditions 

Lindsay - found a bewdy 

Petracca - classy and exciting 

Langdon - excellent running game

Viney - prolific and impressive 

Bowey - not always convincing 

Oliver - unselfish and committed 

Petty - impressive all game

Lever - safe and reliable 

Rivers - had little influence 

Windsor - some exciting cameos

Chandler - was rarely sighted

McDonald - a valuable replacement 

Sharp - pace was valuable 

Fritsch - had little involvement 

Henderson - some nice touches 

Johnson - tried but lacking

Howes - out of depth 

Van Rooyen - seemed totally lost 

Langford - limited game time 

Jefferson - must persevere with

 

 

Fritsch out Turner in, and put May at FF

Chandler out Spargo in

I was at the G and kept a close eye on Fritsch for most of the game.

Whilst he was far from his best and didn't trouble the scorers, I was encouraged by him getting a lot more involved in the sleeves up, second & third effort type stuff, rather than his more typical floating around the fringes waiting for someone to get it to him. 

If he isn't getting points on the board I at least want him putting heat on the opposition defenders so someone else potentially can.

To my eye, he did that job pretty well.

  • Author

How much credit does Fritsch have in the bank after his Grand Final success?

At what stage can we say that his performances just aren’t worthy of automatic selection?


15 minutes ago, joeboy said:

How much credit does Fritsch have in the bank after his Grand Final success?

At what stage can we say that his performances just aren’t worthy of automatic selection?

Carefull....

At times he looked sore and at one stage he couldnt run but in aswer to the question probably by round 4.  Still, who comes in?

1 hour ago, joeboy said:

How much credit does Fritsch have in the bank after his Grand Final success?

At what stage can we say that his performances just aren’t worthy of automatic selection?

I agree

He showed no interest at all getting himself into the game

Fortunately for him, we don't have a replacement

 
23 hours ago, chook fowler said:

Bowey - impressive all game

Yes Chook, I felt that Bowey was impressive across the game, not necessarily all game - but it was great to see him more active and inventive with his kicking skills, accuracy and tenacity in winning the ball on occasion. He can only put these experiences in the bank, work on these, become (once again) a really good clearing backman. I'd hope that the return of Judd will add to his capacities etc.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 91 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 331 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies