Jump to content

PREGAME: Rd 01 vs GWS

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

37 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Windsor maybe.  JVR will be 22 in a few weeks.

Remember that Pickett, Jackson, Bowey, Rivers, Petty, Sparrow, Spargo were all  premiership players when between 18 and 21 years of age.

I agree we have some youth tomorrow but I reckon that is a ok.  If we lose it won't be because of the debs.

Windsor maybe? He's 19?

    • Like 2
     
    1 minute ago, adonski said:

    Windsor maybe? He's 19?

    No need to take one line and nit pick it.

    Read it in context of the rest of the post...

    • Like 1
    2 hours ago, old55 said:

    Yes, but 6 debutantes is still adventurous. Goodwin could definitely gone with TMac and Billings, added Laurie and Woewodin who have AFL exposure, and squeezed Melksham and Spargo in from injury early, but he didn't. He wasn't forced into the debutantes decision.

    Agree mate.. it's certainly a change from the usual conservative policy.

    We're probably a 30% chance of a win but if three of these debutantes become regulars in a winning team as the season goes on I'll be very happy

    • Like 2
    • Clap 1
     
    43 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Windsor maybe.  JVR will be 22 in a few weeks.

    Remember that Pickett, Jackson, Bowey, Rivers, Petty, Sparrow, Spargo were all  premiership players when between 18 and 21 years of age.

    I agree we have some youth tomorrow but I reckon that is a ok.  If we lose it won't be because of the debs.

    22 is youthful in my book, and the guys out of the VFL have that "this is my last chance to make it" hunger which is also youthful in it's essence. I love that we're playing the kids early.These are the guys who haven't got old systems ingrained in them. They should by rights pick up the newer game style more easily. I also think they provide a great energy boost to the older players, especially after the last few seasons dramas. I think it's a smart play by the club. I want to win but I'll take a narrow loss full of effort, glimpses of game plan and solid games by Oliver and Petracca.

    • Like 9
    6 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    No need to take one line and nit pick it.

    Read it in context of the rest of the post...

    I felt a compelling need to and still do 

    • Like 1
    • Love 1

    Henderson has made a very strong impression since coming in. Anyone who is surprised about his inclusion shouldn’t be given how he played against Sandringham last week in a practice match. Think there’ll be a few in the side fairly nervy about their spot with someone who wants to work as hard as him to get a crack. Great signs for the squad depth at the moment even more so because of the unavailability of Koz, Judd, Melksham and Koltyn💪

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 3
    • Love 4
    6 minutes ago, BC_1718_DC said:

    Henderson has made a very strong impression since coming in. Anyone who is surprised about his inclusion shouldn’t be given how he played against Sandringham last week in a practice match. Think there’ll be a few in the side fairly nervy about their spot with someone who wants to work as hard as him to get a crack. Great signs for the squad depth at the moment even more so because of the unavailability of Koz, Judd, Melksham and Koltyn💪

    Were you at the Sandy game? Did Johnson and Jefferson play?

    9 minutes ago, BC_1718_DC said:

    Henderson has made a very strong impression since coming in. Anyone who is surprised about his inclusion shouldn’t be given how he played against Sandringham last week in a practice match. Think there’ll be a few in the side fairly nervy about their spot with someone who wants to work as hard as him to get a crack. Great signs for the squad depth at the moment even more so because of the unavailability of Koz, Judd, Melksham and Koltyn💪

    That’s great to hear. Every good side needs 2-3 players like Henderson who are willing to do anything for the team and will work hard. I can see him cementing a spot as a small forward who also gets up the ground, a bit like Dylan Moore from the Hawks.

    • Like 6
     

    Woey, Laurie and Billings must be spending a bit of time on SEEK at the moment


    20 minutes ago, D Rev said:

    Woey, Laurie and Billings must be spending a bit of time on SEEK at the moment

    Woey is a good chance to ask for a trade imo. I'd like to keep him because I think he's a really hard worker. His issue is finding a role to make his own. I thought he was half a chance when ANB left but Sharp seems the logical replacement now. Injuries and form will occur. 

    I don't think either Laurie or Billings will be playing AFL much. They just don't seem to fit anywhere.

    • Like 3
    4 hours ago, old55 said:

    Yes, but 6 debutantes is still adventurous. Goodwin could definitely gone with TMac and Billings, added Laurie and Woewodin who have AFL exposure, and squeezed Melksham and Spargo in from injury early, but he didn't. He wasn't forced into the debutantes decision.

    As bold as he has EVER been, I like it!

    • Like 3
    33 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

    Woey is a good chance to ask for a trade imo. I'd like to keep him because I think he's a really hard worker. His issue is finding a role to make his own. I thought he was half a chance when ANB left but Sharp seems the logical replacement now. Injuries and form will occur. 

    I don't think either Laurie or Billings will be playing AFL much. They just don't seem to fit anywhere.

    I hope that they are used to give the newer bodies the relief that they will need.

    These players will be part of the full squad that can be used for appropriate match ups.

    I like the idea of playing the new blokes against GWS but am now concerned that the weather may impact. 

    5 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Yes, I'd rather give the newbies a go than play those not ready or tried before that you meniton. 

    For mine the experience of Johnson, Henderson and Sharp to some extent balances out the inexperience of Langford, Linsay and Jefferson who will probably play limited minutes.

    I like that these guys a getting a go as we don't have a lot of depth in our injury list that can come in this year:  McVee, Pickett, Tholstrop and maybe Melksham.

    So getting games into the debs is a good thing.  We will need them to play during the year.

    Turner also unavailable this week, so that’s 5 best 23 IMO who were unavailable this week. 

    But as @old55 has already said, TMac, Billings, Laurie and Woewodin are all fit and available and were the players getting these spots last year. Rather than go back to that well, we’re trying new faces. Like most, I like it (although I’m surprised Billings didn’t get picked).

    • Like 4

    Four players making their AFL debuts.  Feels like a rebuild.


    6 hours ago, forever demons said:

    People used to say the same about Pedo and he proved them all wrong

    Campbell is at his fourth club and is 33 year old. Ripping bloke, good footballer, but not best 23 imo.

    The 6 debutants aren't usually a recipe to success to winning but then again neither is backing in the usual fringe guys

    At least this way we get to see higher upside prospects get a crack and properly strengthen our best 22 in preparation for when Pickett, McVee, Kolt, Disco return

    • Like 2
    5 hours ago, Deestar9 said:

    Did you go to the nth Melb practice match & watch him play against Xerri …more than serviceable & will do the job if needed. So def a fringe 23 player (of which when all fit we have a few )

    The good thing about modern day rucking and their value to the team is, unless you are a Max, being serviceable and playing to the team structures is enough to have an impact. Tom is a team player and will be of good service if/when needed. 

    • Like 4
    1 hour ago, lorn said:

    Four players making their AFL debuts.  Feels like a rebuild.

    We've done a reset on the run post 2021. Or, you could call it simply replenishment, instead of relying on the FA market like Geelong and Hawthorn previously did, we've really hit the draft.

    We've kept our mature guns going (except for Clarry for a chunk of 23 and Trac 24) and brought in a strong new young core 18-21 (Bowey, JVR, McVee, Windsor, Kolt, AMW, Langford and Lindsay), underneath the strong 22-25 year old core that is developing (Rivers, Petty, Kozzy, Turner, Spargo, Sparrow, Chandler). If Howes, Henderson and Sharp can cement their places, that's 10 guys in that 22-25 core.

    We've managed to balance the age profile of the list really well with our guys in the peak of their careers between 26-30 being Clarry, Trac, Langdon, Salem, Fritta and Billings. Remember also, we lost Gus from that group.

    The list is primed for success IMO, injuries permitting, with our guns (Gawn, Trac, Clarry, Viney, Langdon, Lever, May and Kozzy) still firmly in their windows. Only May is getting close, and arguably Max, but didn't slow down last year.

    The only potential hole is that A+ class in the 22-25 core. I think Kozzy has that potential, but we're likely about to lose him. I'd be targeting a gun FA or 22-25 year old in the next 2-3 years. This bit is a watch though.

    Edited by Adam The God

    • Like 5
    2 hours ago, lorn said:

    Four players making their AFL debuts.  Feels like a rebuild.

    Five AFL debuts.

    One debut for us from another club.

    • Like 3

    This team just has the ploddy feels about it without Kozzy and AMW in.

    Yes i realise Moniz wasn'y / isn't a stalwart regular to this point but he did show some serious zip in the lead ups and in patches last season.

    We are also devoid of ground ball getting ability inside 50 and the same with pressure i50 it seems.

    I hope im proven wrong but i think we'll be chasing tail all day and watching a fair bit of the oppo's rear ends as they waltz the ball from our forward 50 into theirs with relative ease.

    I know there's more to footy than just the few aspects mentioned above.  Including areas like team defence, effort, how you set up behind the ball etc but i dunno.

    Just feels like there's a few too many holes to take the chocolates this week against a pretty formidable Giants outfit.

    Edited by Demon Dynasty

    • Like 2
    On 14/03/2025 at 18:17, praha said:

    I might be wrong but this is definitely a changing of the guard moment. This will be a genuine journey. We might surprise but people should temper their expectations. 

    It's interesting isn't it?

    My take is that the core has stayed the same but we have refreshed our bottom ~8 players. Not just quality but the type of player

    I am supportive (until we start losing 🙂)

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
     
    3 hours ago, Adam The God said:

    The list is primed for success IMO, injuries permitting, with our guns (Gawn, Trac, Clarry, Viney, Langdon, Lever, May and Kozzy) still firmly in their windows. Only May is getting close, and arguably Max, but didn't slow down last year.

    Just curious when you think the list is primed for success?  I don’t think we will make finals this year but think we will be in better shape next year when a lot of those younger players you mentioned might impact games more. 

    7 minutes ago, ANG13 said:

    Just curious when you think the list is primed for success?  I don’t think we will make finals this year but think we will be in better shape next year when a lot of those younger players you mentioned might impact games more. 

    Because!


    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Vomit
        • Like
      • 86 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Haha
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 316 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Sad
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All