Jump to content

Featured Replies

9 hours ago, Colm said:

He’s not player at a level that’s reflects his $900k a year contract. We are already not getting value for money from Clarry and still on the hook for some of Brayshaw’s contract. I don’t think we can afford him unless Freo are willing to pay a chunk which won’t happen.

I don't think these blokes are a burden on the Club the way you mentioned, at all. Clarry is a( wanted at every other club) revelation. Bradshaw...it's not a matter of being "on the hook".

What we owe both of them is intangible.

Other Clubs would have held a commemorative game to celebrate that flag by now.

 

Whoever has to replace Max is on a hiding to nothing, may as well be somebody we've got happy memories of.

55 minutes ago, Willmoy1947 said:

I don't think these blokes are a burden on the Club the way you mentioned, at all. Clarry is a( wanted at every other club) revelation. Bradshaw...it's not a matter of being "on the hook".

What we owe both of them is intangible.

Other Clubs would have held a commemorative game to celebrate that flag by now.

I wasn’t having a crack at either of those two players. Such a shame Gus is no longer playing and I hope Clarry sticks around and returns to his former high standards.

My point is about cap space, as I understand it as the AFL’s contribution towards Brayshaw’s contract decreases each year and Clarry’s contract increases up to $1.7m. That’s a fair whack of cap space gone for the next few seasons and if Clarry can’t return to his former high standards then we aren’t going to be getting a great return for investment.

Having said all that, I had a look at the money clubs are paying other rucks and $900k for Luke isn’t stupid money these days

 
9 hours ago, roy11 said:

How willing would Freo be to get rid of LJ when the other main ruck is injury prone and not that mobile, and on 1 mil a season.

Yeah regardless of how real him wanting to come back is he's basically trapped there. Darcy is fully cooked now. No way they trade him for anything. Don't even think they'd be that desperate for Kozzy anymore.

4 hours ago, Anti-Saint said:

G QBD ... Garry looks a bit like the robot out of Get Smart in this clip!

Wow. That brings back a lot of memories

Price is Right was a regular show during dinner at our house!!!


On 06/05/2025 at 23:35, John Demonic said:

images.webp

200.gif

IMG_5631.jpeg

7 hours ago, Anti-Saint said:

G QBD ... Garry looks a bit like the robot out of Get Smart in this clip!

Doesn't he!

Anyways, 'Luke Jackson, come on down!'

 

“WA is an unbelievable to place to be when you’re 18, 19, like it’s a great party and these Perth boys go back at 22 and all their mates have sort of grown up a bit,” he said on Triple M.

“There’s so many people that got a trade back to WA and then came back, not mentioning one that potentially could be coming back soon ... let’s hope.”

Host Mick Molloy’s ears pricked up at the comment, to which Gawn quickly said he was only “going off what The Agenda Setters say” and pointed to Channel 7’s Nick Riewoldt.

Jackson has maintained a close relationship with his premiership coach Simon Goodwin after joining the Dockers ahead of the 2023 season.

Fremantle is also heavily pursuing a trade for contracted Melbourne small forward Kozzy Pickett and any move for Jackson could form part of a transaction.

The West Australian
No image preview

Max Gawn drops subtle hint on potential Luke Jackson trade

The superstar captain was speaking about Jesse Hogan when he made the link to the Fremantle big man.

What I’ve been hearing for sometime now is that Luke has had a major falling out with a very close family member and they haven’t spoken for a while.

Luke is a very popular teammate, but he’s a very simple bloke and probably didn’t understand the real motives for his family wanting him back in Perth on a big contract.

His girlfriend is in Melbourne, and he certainly realises that it’s also better for his long term financial wellbeing to be out of Perth.

At the same time I’m hearing that certain people at the Dees are getting weary of “walking on eggshells” around Kozzie

The Club loves Kozzie and Kozzie loves the Club, but recently there has been a growing recognition from many in the Club that Kozzie needs to be in WA.

There’s a lot to play out, but this swap seems to resolve the need for two players to move to where they want to live.

The most fascinating thing will be what each Club will want as a sweetener.


Just now, goodwindees said:

The most fascinating thing will be what each Club will want as a sweetener.

straight swap, player for player

first time since mitch clark - heritier lumumba - travis varcoe?

Interesting (?) article by Jon Ralph on Code Sports. (paywall):

Nine weeks in and Melbourne has steadied its ship tactically, shored up its coach’s position, and yet still isn’t anywhere near the AFL’s best sides.

At 3-6, it isn’t time for despair though.

It isn’t even time to give the season away – the Demons face Brisbane (away), Collingwood, Gold Coast and Adelaide in the next 11 weeks but also West Coast, North Melbourne, St Kilda (twice), Port Adelaide and Sydney.

But the sample size we have seen so far is enough to show the course ahead.

Like Essendon has in recent years, the Demons can lift their eyes to the horizon and set that course for 2027-2029 through smart list management moves that require bravery and an element of risk.

...

Melbourne hasn’t given up on Luke Jackson returning but every time Sean Darcy’s knee fails him the Dockers’ resolve to retain their unicorn of a ruckman should harden.

Jackson is contracted to 2029, has games-based clauses for even longer, will soon be paid over $1 million a year and the Dockers would be plain stupid to let him leave for any sum or trade package.

So the task ahead is simple.

Keep playing the kids, slowly begin to integrate the Brad Scott-style message about considering the medium-term future, keep working on those relationships.

Then if a knock-your-socks off offer comes for Lever or Petracca or Pickett, the discussions can be had in a calm, sensible manner instead of the Demons losing in the kind of fire sale they would have had to accept last year.

A premiership within the last five seasons gives the club and its coach some breathing space, as does a president (Brad Green) and a new CEO (Paul Guerra) who would like Goodwin to be part of the future.

https://www.codesports.com.au/afl/melbourne/wreck-it-ralph-melbourne-have-steadied-the-ship-now-they-should-look-to-the-future/news-story/70c1e8adad488405b1a75d7f2e0f706d?amp&fbclid=IwY2xjawKOlhpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFEalV4eEhjeVBwZXFEbTVkAR5S1pL-Vad8J-UQiWS6iS4lTheh-3mZJTtNJQ6EpF0Fhz4AqrUz4j3kCalbfA_aem_h6wxlHzIvKAGKRyL2DOt1A

2 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

straight swap, player for player

Feel like we'd lose on that, Pickett changes the team in a way that Jackson never will/can. Not knocking Jackson either, would be fabulous to have him back.

From the Codesports article re Pickett:

KOZZIE PICKETT

Melbourne’s No.1 priority with Pickett should be to extend his contract, not allow him to leave.

He is a generational talent who transforms Melbourne from drab to dangerous.

His new manager Anthony Van Der Wielen will spend the next few months finding out what Pickett really wants.

Safe to say the Dockers are relatively confident given the links to their club – Shai Bolton, Isaiah Dudley, Quinton Narkle, whose partner Taylah Cubillo is the sister of Pickett’s partner Ardu Cubillo.

Van Der Wielen didn’t take him on to move him west like fellow clients Tim Kelly and Bolton, he did it because Kelly and Bolton were keen to have him on board.

He wants to set up Pickett’s financial future past 2027, so is open to a contract extension wherever it comes.

So Melbourne’s priority shouldn’t be to retain him to 2027, it should be offering him a long-term deal on well over $1 million past that date.

If it costs $4 million to extend him from 2027 to 2030, then so be it.

They are very open to that possibility but for now are thrilled he is playing dynamic football and is enjoying his time at the club.

Securing two mid-ranked first-rounders for Pickett (and some steak-knives picks) will never get them fair compensation so the only play is to keep him or extend him.

2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Then if a knock-your-socks off offer comes for Lever or Petracca or Pickett, the discussions can be had in a calm, sensible manner instead of the Demons losing in the kind of fire sale they would have had to accept last year.

If anyone's silly enough to ask the question of Lever's availability we should take what we can get and run


31 minutes ago, goodwindees said:

What I’ve been hearing for sometime now is that Luke has had a major falling out with a very close family member and they haven’t spoken for a while.

Luke is a very popular teammate, but he’s a very simple bloke and probably didn’t understand the real motives for his family wanting him back in Perth on a big contract.

His girlfriend is in Melbourne, and he certainly realises that it’s also better for his long term financial wellbeing to be out of Perth.

At the same time I’m hearing that certain people at the Dees are getting weary of “walking on eggshells” around Kozzie

The Club loves Kozzie and Kozzie loves the Club, but recently there has been a growing recognition from many in the Club that Kozzie needs to be in WA.

There’s a lot to play out, but this swap seems to resolve the need for two players to move to where they want to live.

The most fascinating thing will be what each Club will want as a sweetener.

Thanks as always. The family bit is interesting, I reckon I could guess what that is. The tidbit about eggshells is equally interesting.

25 minutes ago, adonski said:

If anyone's silly enough to ask the question of Lever's availability we should take what we can get and run

Where did Lever’s name come from? There’s speculation someone wants him?!

5 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

Where did Lever’s name come from? There’s speculation someone wants him?!

The Jon Ralph article posted above. It reads more like Ralphy thinking out loud rather than anything meaningful:

Then if a knock-your-socks off offer comes for Lever or Petracca or Pickett, the discussions can be had in a calm, sensible manner instead of the Demons losing in the kind of fire sale they would have had to accept last year.

2 minutes ago, adonski said:

The Jon Ralph article posted above. It reads more like Ralphy thinking out loud rather than anything meaningful:

Then if a knock-your-socks off offer comes for Lever or Petracca or Pickett, the discussions can be had in a calm, sensible manner instead of the Demons losing in the kind of fire sale they would have had to accept last year.

im sure adelaide would love him back


39 minutes ago, goodwindees said:

What I’ve been hearing for sometime now is that Luke has had a major falling out with a very close family member and they haven’t spoken for a while.

Luke is a very popular teammate, but he’s a very simple bloke and probably didn’t understand the real motives for his family wanting him back in Perth on a big contract.

His girlfriend is in Melbourne, and he certainly realises that it’s also better for his long term financial wellbeing to be out of Perth.

At the same time I’m hearing that certain people at the Dees are getting weary of “walking on eggshells” around Kozzie

The Club loves Kozzie and Kozzie loves the Club, but recently there has been a growing recognition from many in the Club that Kozzie needs to be in WA.

There’s a lot to play out, but this swap seems to resolve the need for two players to move to where they want to live.

The most fascinating thing will be what each Club will want as a sweetener.

I literally saw this play out on that Flagmantle facebook page.. it was getting that nasty between family members that the dumb [censored] that run that page didn't even delete the comments and left it all on there for everyone to see.

Definitely wasn't pretty..

I don’t want to lose Kozzy and would much rather keep him than bring in Jackson (if the two are mutually exclusive)

BUT if the club is resigned to losing him at the end of his contract I’d much rather bring in a known quantity in an elite player like Jackson than be forced to take a couple of middling first round picks

If both story lines continue to develop it could be very interesting come trade time

Edited by demoncat

 

Nope not doing a straight swap. Kozzy is on peanuts compared to LJ. If we are to take on his salary until 2029 then it has to come with this years first round pick. Kozzy is really starting to show what he is capable of. He has another 2-3 years before he hits prime Kozzy. LJ hasnt really improved to the levels we all expected.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 2 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 166 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 434 replies