Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
9 hours ago, Deestroye said:

Laughed at that, opening line by interviewer on the lines of “you were a late contender”.

Was a nice drive by 😂 by way of pointing out he was certainly not their first choice.

If you have been following this matter of importance over recent times you would have been aware of that fact.

For various reasons most candidates were ensconced in comfortable and well suited positions and not fit a long time previously.

I don’t regard a person of this standing as being the successful candidate as less suited to the CEO role than the many others previously touted.

Like with Gary Pert who I Maintain despite his Clarry look around was an extremely positive influence on our club.

Many will say he left a mess but the previous majority of years were successful both on and off the field. Some will disagree that’s fine but if you go into detail given our last 60 years that’s beyond dispute.

Paul Guerra looks a fine positive and knowledgeable Senior CEO with great business and administration skills.

Let’s give him our full support in his journey to raise our level back to near the top.

10 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

This Paul Guerra is an impressive man, got a very good feeling about his appointment.

Great Interview on Footy Classified.

Thumbs up from me.👍

We have a problem though, their is a rat on our board that keeps leaking to the media.

Paul's appointment was leaked to Caro before he even knew, this rat needs to baited and caught then thrown in the trash where they belong.

Not good for business at all.


Doesnt necessary have to have come via a board member. Maybe a candidate was told no, who let Carro know. She never said he had the job. She indicated Paul was in her opinion the leading candidate.

8 hours ago, bluey said:

September is a long ways off, I see the this as a huge blunder.

Appears we went door knocking.

Of course we went knocking. That's what an external consultant does. Do you think there is a line of CEO waiting at the front door. Never bean head hunted Blue??

Edited by BangBnagBang

 
23 minutes ago, 58er said:

If you have been following this matter of importance over recent times you would have been aware of that fact.

For various reasons most candidates were ensconced in comfortable and well suited positions and not fit a long time previously.

I don’t regard a person of this standing as being the successful candidate as less suited to the CEO role than the many others previously touted.

Like with Gary Pert who I Maintain despite his Clarry look around was an extremely positive influence on our club.

Many will say he left a mess but the previous majority of years were successful both on and off the field. Some will disagree that’s fine but if you go into detail given our last 60 years that’s beyond dispute.

Paul Guerra looks a fine positive and knowledgeable Senior CEO with great business and administration skills.

Let’s give him our full support in his journey to raise our level back to near the top.

Agree with all of what you said, and support him.

I just found the drive by comical. Probably not required by the interviewer.

5 minutes ago, Deestroye said:

Agree with all of what you said, and support him.

I just found the drive by comical. Probably not required by the interviewer.

I took it that the interviewer misunderstood the situation rather than giving a drive by.


15 hours ago, deanox said:

Reality bus. Fugazi. The list goes on!

15 hours ago, deanox said:

Reality bus. Fugazi. The list goes on!

15 hours ago, deanox said:

Reality bus. Fugazi. The list goes on!

Dont forget the love boat or the boast "best culture in 40 years"

31 minutes ago, BangBnagBang said:

Doesnt necessary have to have come via a board member. Maybe a candidate was told no, who let Carro know. She never said he had the job. She indicated Paul was in her opinion the leading candidate.

Paul Guerra even mentioned it unfortunately got leaked an hour before to Caro.

If some can add the start of the interview to the thread it will tell you all you need to know. Paul even confirmed the allegation from Eddie.

Why would a candidate leak that?

There is a rat in our boardroom.

It's a problem and no doubt Tom Morris in some way has his greasy mitts all over it.

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges

10 hours ago, Deestroye said:

Laughed at that, opening line by interviewer on the lines of “you were a late contender”.

Was a nice drive by 😂 by way of pointing out he was certainly not their first choice.

My take on it Deestroye from one of his interviews was that he was approached a month ago that implies the club was still on the hunt until Paul Guera entered the fray so to speak.👍😁

 
11 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

This Paul Guerra is an impressive man, got a very good feeling about his appointment.

Great Interview on Footy Classified.

Thumbs up from me.👍

We have a problem though, their is a rat on our board that keeps leaking to the media.

Paul's appointment was leaked to Caro before he even knew, this rat needs to baited and caught then thrown in the trash where they belong.

Not good for business at all.


I fear you are correct. However, on this matter there may be other sources from outside the club who may have been in the know and leaked it. These include his personal referees, his current employer, someone within AFL HQ, someone at the other organisations in which he's involved such as Racing Victoria, and probably others.

1 hour ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

To everyone questioning the start date, I think it should be seen as a positive.

Do we want to be employing a CEO who can just jump straight into this type of role? That would mean he is either currently unemployed, or is in a lower role and doesn't have a long exit time required.

I imagine with his current employment contract as CEO there is an extended timeframe that he must give when resigning from his CEO position. This is fairly standard for that type of role, given it is highly specialised and important to an organisation, so as to give them time to plan for his exit.

Yes and he also said he will be working in his time on club matters, until he starts with us.


Missed the interview on classified, also probably because I don't watch it.

Anyway I'll back Brad Green & the board in. Give him a go. I reckon he's got good business contacts

I’d be very surprised if he isn’t spending time each week working with the club and its stakeholders. I’m guessing he’ll be at our matches pretty regularly.

1 hour ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Paul Guerra even mentioned it unfortunately got leaked an hour before to Caro.

If some can add the start of the interview to the thread it will tell you all you need to know. Paul even confirmed the allegation from Eddie.

Why would a candidate leak that?

There is a rat in our boardroom.

It's a problem and no doubt Tom Morris in some way has his greasy mitts all over it.

it got out but it doesn't mean it got out via a MFC board member

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I fear you are correct. However, on this matter there may be other sources from outside the club who may have been in the know and leaked it. These include his personal referees, his current employer, someone within AFL HQ, someone at the other organisations in which he's involved such as Racing Victoria, and probably others.

This ⬆️

28 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

I’d be very surprised if he isn’t spending time each week working with the club and its stakeholders. I’m guessing he’ll be at our matches pretty regularly.

It’s not ideal, two seasons with patched up management 24/25 25/26

All the loser clubs who are clearly done would have completed pre planning, planning for season 25/26, two months before September, and discussed a way forward.

Imagine attempting to recruit high profile players and signing on multi million dollar contracts.

Edited by bluey
An after thought.

I’m nitpicking, but why doesn’t the club say it like it is. We DO NOT have a new CEO yet, as he is not available to take the reigns until September… at season’s end which puts us another four and a half months behind in progress establishing our permanent training headquarter’s.

I don’t pretend to know how things work at that level, but does the fact that he will be fulfilling other commitments before taking on the CEO position in September, mean that he will not be getting up to speed with what is happening at the MFC until he officially takes on the role? If that’s the case, then we will be entering season 2026 in not much better condition as a club (from a business POV), than we did this year.

I received a survey from the club today and honestly, I don’t think I’ve ever spent so much time, or typed so many words, in filling one of those out in the past!


2 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I fear you are correct. However, on this matter there may be other sources from outside the club who may have been in the know and leaked it. These include his personal referees, his current employer, someone within AFL HQ, someone at the other organisations in which he's involved such as Racing Victoria, and probably others.

I understand where you are coming from @La Dee-vina Comedia but it just doesn't sound right to me.

Why are other clubs water tight with these dealings and announcements?

Why would other parties be privy to this decision from our club? we are not run by the AFL like in 2009/2010.

It's not like Brad Green called his current employer or all his stated referees to mention that Paul has been chosen as the new CEO of the MFC.

As soon as he got the nod thats Paul's business to mention it to his current place of work and he chose to sit on it for 24hrs.

This can only be the work of a board member who sat at the table when these decisions were made.

There is a board member who likes the smell and taste of 🧀 and I know at the Dees board members are known to love a nice cheese platter.

4 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

To everyone questioning the start date, I think it should be seen as a positive.

Do we want to be employing a CEO who can just jump straight into this type of role? That would mean he is either currently unemployed, or is in a lower role and doesn't have a long exit time required.

I imagine with his current employment contract as CEO there is an extended timeframe that he must give when resigning from his CEO position. This is fairly standard for that type of role, given it is highly specialised and important to an organisation, so as to give them time to plan for his exit.

If that's all true DJ why did we use the language in teh announcement to members that "he will hit the ground running and Members will have opportunities to hear directly from him very soon". Pure speculation but maybe:

  1. He was called after the Board meeting to say he had the job.

  2. Caro had broken her story as the Board meeting was occurring - so the Board says: Is it OK Paul if we send out a notice to members? You'll be able to start soon, right?

  3. The next day his existing employer says - Hang on a minute, you have a notice period here.....

He can still honour the part of doing some media, but he certainly cannot "hit the ground running".

Let's all hope that VECCI lets him go early.

Messy start though.

47 minutes ago, Harvey Wallbanger said:

If that's all true DJ why did we use the language in teh announcement to members that "he will hit the ground running and Members will have opportunities to hear directly from him very soon". Pure speculation but maybe:

  1. He was called after the Board meeting to say he had the job.

  2. Caro had broken her story as the Board meeting was occurring - so the Board says: Is it OK Paul if we send out a notice to members? You'll be able to start soon, right?

  3. The next day his existing employer says - Hang on a minute, you have a notice period here.....

He can still honour the part of doing some media, but he certainly cannot "hit the ground running".

Let's all hope that VECCI lets him go early.

Messy start though.

It's a figure of speech, whether they should've used those words who knows.

It's not messy at all. I really don't understand posters concerns with any of this tbh.

This smells of another poorly managed appointment. I am not feeling enthusiastic about it much at all. What new CEO needs a 4 month notice period from their current employer? Give me a spell.

We needed someone to hit the ground running and spend most of the season getting up to speed.

Suprised by the reaction on here.

Our new CEO has obviously been working on a big project, that he wants to see through. Due diligence I would call it.

I would believe he will still be in serious contact with the MFC Board during this year. We have a CEO running the Club at present, the seat is not vacant.

Let the guy finish his commitments so that he joins with a clean slate


In this day and age I would be doubtful of any arguments negating the ability of Guerra to egress his current position in a month. ( if he wanted to )

Hardly anyone is irreplaceable in the Corporate world. CEO are essentially overseers .

24 minutes ago, Bowserpower said:

This smells of another poorly managed appointment. I am not feeling enthusiastic about it much at all. What new CEO needs a 4 month notice period from their current employer? Give me a spell.

We needed someone to hit the ground running and spend most of the season getting up to speed.

So is the club expected to go for a lesser candidate who can start today? I’m really not sure what the concerns are.

6 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Suprised by the reaction on here.

Our new CEO has obviously been working on a big project, that he wants to see through. Due diligence I would call it.

I would believe he will still be in serious contact with the MFC Board during this year. We have a CEO running the Club at present, the seat is not vacant.

Let the guy finish his commitments so that he joins with a clean slate

How many people honestly knew who our CEO was until this week? It's been a faceless role this year.

How many other clubs wait for this long for a new CEO to merely start the job?

 
Just now, Roost it far said:

So is the club expected to go for a lesser candidate who can start today? I’m really not sure what the concerns are.

I hear the general manager at the Priceline down the street only needs a week's notice. Might as well get him in for an interview 😛

How did the board not brief Guerra before going on Footy Classified last night?

Either Caulfield has hit a major snag (read it's potentially over) and he was briefed on that, which is why he was non-committal on Caulfield, or he wasn't briefed and allowed Eddie and Hird to push Port Melbourne and even Waverley without major rebuttal.

Think back to when PJ appeared on these shows. He'd immediately pit you at ease by calling a spade a spade and nipping the wrong messages in the bud.

Edited by Adam The God


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • FEATURE: 1925

    A hundred years ago today, on 2 May 1925, Melbourne kicked off the new season with a 47 point victory over St Kilda to take top place on the VFL ladder after the opening round of the new season.  Top place was a relatively unknown position for the team then known as the “Fuchsias.” They had finished last in 1923 and rose by only one place in the following year although the final home and away round heralded a promise of things to come when they surprised the eventual premiers Essendon. That victory set the stage for more improvement and it came rapidly. In this series, I will tell the story of how the 1925 season unfolded for the Melbourne Football Club and how it made the VFL finals for the first time in a decade on the way to the ultimate triumph a year later.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    Saturday’s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach in Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but I’ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demons’ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, based on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.  At the time, the Eagles already had two wins off the back of a couple of the young man’s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 08

    Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Like
    • 148 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 563 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Richmond

    The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Richmond

    The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland