Jump to content

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, Jeremy said:

Surely Tim Lamb can’t survive a fourth consecutive year of doing SFA in the trade period ? We’re not improving 

I look at it as a bonus that Lamb isn't stuffing up our list this year with aging rejects from other clubs.

I'm not saying Derksen is a reject because GWS clearly want to keep him. And he's young enough to have upside.

The trade period is still early, so Lamb has plenty of time to stuff things up.

 
19 minutes ago, demoncat said:

If Derksen isn’t available it sounds like we’ve got SFA to look forward to for the rest of the trade period 

Here’s to the pick swaps 🙌

I don't get why we don't go after Tim Membrey!!! always kills us when we play the AINTS!

14 minutes ago, mo64 said:

I look at it as a bonus that Lamb isn't stuffing up our list this year with aging rejects from other clubs.

Ignoring Tom Campbell are we?  A "ruck" 13 years in the system, now at his 4th club at 32 years old, played only 50 games and is barely taller than most forwards?  Talk about wasting a list spot

 
3 minutes ago, Yarra Valley Demon said:

Ignoring Tom Campbell are we?  A "ruck" 13 years in the system, now at his 4th club at 32 years old, played only 50 games and is barely taller than most forwards?  Talk about wasting a list spot

What's your plan for a Gawn injury? Tom Fullarton?

  • Author
15 minutes ago, Yarra Valley Demon said:

Ignoring Tom Campbell are we?  A "ruck" 13 years in the system, now at his 4th club at 32 years old, played only 50 games and is barely taller than most forwards?  Talk about wasting a list spot

We didn't have a back up for Max

Fullerton is not a ruck

Verrall is still raw


Day one of the trading period and posters are bemoaning that we haven't yet brought in any players.

This happens every year.  You'd think people might learn to wait until the trade period is over before panicking.

33 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Day one of the trading period and posters are bemoaning that we haven't yet brought in any players.

This happens every year.  You'd think people might learn to wait until the trade period is over before panicking.

When was the last trade period where we bought in a quality player late in the piece?

Lever, Hibbo, Melk, Langdon were all lined up weeks in advance. May I think set his sights on us pretty quickly too.

I have to go back to Mitch Clark which was a disaster in the end.

All the big names this year have clubs attached aside from Houston who is waiting to see if Coll/Carl get the currency.

The good news is we might get another Billings or Hunter. Fantastic. Great.

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

I don't get why we don't go after Tim Membrey!!! always kills us when we play the AINTS!

Yes, but if he played for us, he'd have no bunnies left to kick bags against.

 
7 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

When was the last trade period where we bought in a quality player late in the piece?

Trade period runs for ten days.  Let's not lose our lunch on the morning of day one.

24 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Lever, Hibbo, Melk, Langdon were all lined up weeks in advance. May I think set his sights on us pretty quickly too.

All the big names this year have clubs attached aside from Houston who is waiting to see if Coll/Carl get the currency.

I would rate Lever and May above any player being traded this year, Houston included. Langdon, Melksham and Hibberd are up there with any of the other players who have already moved or are talking about moving in trade or free agency this year.

My point being that the available players this year are pretty poor. Perryman, Cumming etc, nice to have but nothing amazing. We were never a chance at the WA returners so they are ignored from the discussion.

While we're not getting much, we're not missing out on much.

Edited by seventyfour


30 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Trade period runs for ten days.  Let's not lose our lunch on the morning of day one.

Which is a farce. Should run 3/4 days max

27 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

Which is a farce. Should run 3/4 days max

You’re a little out there, should run for 3-4 months, if not longer.

The trade window should be from mid October until March with a summer break.

Proper free agency should occur with a busy rush in mid October.

1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

Trade period runs for ten days.  Let's not lose our lunch on the morning of day one.

If we get no one we get no one, draft is always more important to small clubs.

But I disagree with the idea a high quality player is suddenly going to come to us.

Our main target was Houston. Our second target with Derksen.

I’d be shocked if we get anyone of quality. But some times the best pick ups are the bargain buys, they just haven’t been for us in a long time. 

Should be trades all year round. HQ would not like as they like to dominate the sports news cycle.

4 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Should be trades all year round. HQ would not like as they like to dominate the sports news cycle.

I hate the way in some leagues you can top up late in seasons, at most a mid year deadline. And even then I’d prefer if mid year is only for fringe players somehow.

But if they had trade deadlines in late November (summer trade window), March (pre season) and a mid year window they’d have 3 periods of movement and a bumper free agency period in October. Plus more movement around the draft. 


Pretty pathetic by GWS not to consider a trade. They have heaps of depth in KP players, he has family reasons to want to be in Melbourne and they haven’t given him a game. Hardly a player to really put your foot down on. I hope he leaves next year for nothing.

6 minutes ago, KozzyCan said:

Lamb didn't sound too convincing re Derksen and GWS been firm. Not great signs.

Only early doors. Plenty of time left to surprise everyone.

10 hours ago, Yarra Valley Demon said:

Ignoring Tom Campbell are we?  A "ruck" 13 years in the system, now at his 4th club at 32 years old, played only 50 games and is barely taller than most forwards?  Talk about wasting a list spot

 

10 hours ago, Axis of Bob said:

What's your plan for a Gawn injury? Tom Fullarton?

Axis - well we saw that didn’t work; didn’t appear to even considered when we were at ruck rock bottom. 

GWS are simply spitting the dummy here.  They’ve lost Perryman, Cumming, Peatling. Haynes.   They must have a toxic culture.  Their players can’t wait to get out.  Cameron. Caldwell. Taranto. Hopper. Treloar. Shiel. Tomlinson. Williams. And plenty more have walked out.  
 

A young bloke who hasn’t been played wants a better situation for his family.  He’s stuck behind too many at the Giants who are stacked with tall defenders and tall forwards.   Strange decision by the Giants.  
 

If I’m Lamb, I’m still pushing and asking the question. I’d offer Pick “48” on the table.  Thats more than reasonable. If the Giants hold out or ask for more, its disrespectful to the Dees, to Derksen and his family.  


16 hours ago, Axis of Bob said:

What's your plan for a Gawn injury? Tom Fullarton?

Can someone explain exactly WHY we ever got Fullarton??? Rucks at Casey, but not a forward! Whoever decided he was worth a list spot should be shown the door!

16 hours ago, SthSea22 said:

We didn't have a back up for Max

Fullerton is not a ruck

Verrall is still raw

Verrall has been on the list for two years, that would suggest we have failed in the necessary development phase. Casey is a bit of joke at the moment.

1 hour ago, Ugottobekidding said:

Verrall has been on the list for two years, that would suggest we have failed in the necessary development phase. Casey is a bit of joke at the moment.

Max Gawn was drafted in 2009. 

2010 = 0 games

2011 = 4 games

2012 = 0 games.

4 games in three years before he went on to develop into one of the best ruckman of all time.

Rucks take longer.

 
1 hour ago, picket fence said:

Can someone explain exactly WHY we ever got Fullarton??? Rucks at Casey, but not a forward! Whoever decided he was worth a list spot should be shown the door!

It's the same person/people who re-signed Schache for another year. However, according to many on here the decisions were justifiable because Fullarton and Schache were cheap depth, lol.

Hopefully the football department review weeds out the incompetent decision makers from the past 3 years.

Alot of drama is being made of late picks used on depth players, yes they have failed, but l am more focussed on getting and using our top picks such as windsor and kolt. houston is overpriced in my view also


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies