Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 20/04/2025 at 18:27, picket fence said:

Nick Daicos is the most overated outside player in the competition,of his 35 possesions 27 were UNCONTESTED! GUY IS A MASSIVE FRAUD! Never ever goes when its his turn and struggles to lay a tackle. Has hardly or never taken a contested mark in his career! FAIRY FLOSS

He's really not 'picket', like it or not the kid is a great player and match winner.

...and as KB used to say, it's hard to tackle when you've got the ball.

 

Yep, Daicos is a gun. The little twerp.

On 20/04/2025 at 16:13, lorn said:

Better than Nick Daicos in two years?

He’s already taken more contested marks than little Nicky.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 

Just a fast runner,but HATES CONTACT! His brother is a much better player

Nick Daicos is an absolute gun, if you think he’s not you have NFI


9 hours ago, Macca said:

I reckon you're right, Pennant

The Dominator played for Prahran which was in our zone I believe. Sheedy was another who played for Prahran and we might have knocked him back?

Later on, we knocked him back as a potential coach?

I went to a Tom Hafey talk years ago and I think I remember him saying Sheedy had been knocked back after training with Melbourne, Norm Smith thought he was too small and too slow as a centre man. He then came to Richmond and he fitted Hafey’s model perfectly. Hafey was big on fitness and aggression, he spoke highly of how Sheedy set such high training standards. Not often Norm got things wrong like that.

8 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

I went to a Tom Hafey talk years ago and I think I remember him saying Sheedy had been knocked back after training with Melbourne, Norm Smith thought he was too small and too slow as a centre man. He then came to Richmond and he fitted Hafey’s model perfectly. Hafey was big on fitness and aggression, he spoke highly of how Sheedy set such high training standards. Not often Norm got things wrong like that.

His Wiki page touches on what you said, EH, and is an interesting read overall as well

Different times back then but I remember him as a real nasty type who was also a very good player (played 8 times for the Vics)

As for the Bison, I wouldn't mind it if he turned out to be good as Sheedy (personalities aside)

Nick Daicos is as close to as I've seen to Gary Ablett Jnr.

Absolute jet.. anyone who thinks otherwise are delusional.

 
1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Nick Daicos is as close to as I've seen to Gary Ablett Jnr.

Absolute jet.. anyone who thinks otherwise are delusional.

Different player to Ablett 'dazz' , but there's no doubt he is an absolute jet.

Just now, rjay said:

Different player to Ablett 'dazz' , but there's no doubt he is an absolute jet.

In terms of he's simply just too good. He attracts the footy, he runs hard both ways, and it's getting to the point where you physically cannot tag him.

I hate it because he plays for Collingwood, but he's a genuine superstar.


3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

In terms of he's simply just too good. He attracts the footy, he runs hard both ways, and it's getting to the point where you physically cannot tag him.

I hate it because he plays for Collingwood, but he's a genuine superstar.

I'd love to see teams try to put a bit more physical pressure on him. Nothing untoward just see how he would handle some tough bodywork.

13 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I'd love to see teams try to put a bit more physical pressure on him. Nothing untoward just see how he would handle some tough bodywork.

He cops a fair bit 'Gonzo'...got flattened by a classic rib tickler the other night and got up, dusted himself off and went on his merry way.

Anyway, back to Harvey; looks like we got a good one here and his mate Lindsay is not far behind him.

27 minutes ago, rjay said:

Anyway, back to Harvey; looks like we got a good one here and his mate Lindsay is not far behind him.

i have lindsay ahead primarily cos his disposal looks to be so, so clean

I reckon we made a big error making Langford sub v GWS.If he’d played the whole game, I’m sure we’d have won.

He had done well in the practice matches, then dominated for Casey the next week after GWS.We should be won 2, lost 4.


8 hours ago, DeelightfulPlay said:

I believe the nickname was the invention of @Supreme_Demon , and popularised amongst the boys by @Ghostwriter ?

I just thought Harvey Langford was a big strong lad who looked tough and determined.

The nickname of "The Bison" was only a suggestion. But I am quite pleased that it has caught on. 😊

3 minutes ago, Supreme_Demon said:

I just thought Harvey Langford was a big strong lad who looked tough and determined.

The nickname of "The Bison" was only a suggestion. But I am quite pleased that it has caught on. 😊

Hopefully not.

This is Australia.

In future he will be known as the Mallee bull.

2 hours ago, picket fence said:

Just a fast runner,but HATES CONTACT! His brother is a much better player

Definitely think Josh is the more mercurial of the 2. Nick is simply an accumulator.

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Nick Daicos is as close to as I've seen to Gary Ablett Jnr.

Absolute jet.. anyone who thinks otherwise are delusional.

Not the player comparison I’d be making. He is v. good but predominately an outside player. Nothing wrong with that but if Collingwood lose the inside game Nick is not going to have an impact which is where Ablett Jnr and others like Bont can have.

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

In terms of he's simply just too good. He attracts the footy, he runs hard both ways, and it's getting to the point where you physically cannot tag him.

we let the only bloke who could tag him go 🙃


5 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

we let the only bloke who could tag him go 🙃

Jordie Mc Kenzie was a great tagger, but not much else Dazz!

3 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Jordie Mc Kenzie was a great tagger, but not much else Dazz!

He's talking about Toby Bedford..

40 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Jordie Mc Kenzie was a great tagger, but not much else Dazz!

From memory his sister went alright!

 
11 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I'd love to see teams try to put a bit more physical pressure on him. Nothing untoward just see how he would handle some tough bodywork.

and his opponent stands so he cant easily get on to his left. At the moment he is being treated like a kid playing his first few games.

(Gunna be a champ).


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 105 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies