Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

 
On 13/01/2024 at 09:14, daisycutter said:

i think it's more to do with aflw than afl.  there's your reason.

But it shouldn’t be more to do with the AFLW. Why would/should it be? It’s not like the no white shorts ruling - which only applies to the AFLW - a decision that was made because research was showing that having to wear white shorts was stopping many young girls from continuing to play footy once they reached early teens. There’s no reason for the W comp to be any different to the M in terms of disclosing a player’s weight. 

14 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

Or old woman!!!! 🤣

Edited by WalkingCivilWar
Changed ‘women’ to ‘woman’ since there’s only one old woman shouting at clouds that I know of 😁

 
1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

Don’t get me started on cloud seeding, Chem trails etc.

It triggers me.


2 hours ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

What would you rather shout at. The clouds or your missus. Clouds are much safer.

3 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

But it shouldn’t be more to do with the AFLW. Why would/should it be? It’s not like the no white shorts ruling - which only applies to the AFLW - a decision that was made because research was showing that having to wear white shorts was stopping many young girls from continuing to play footy once they reached early teens. There’s no reason for the W comp to be any different to the M in terms of disclosing a player’s weight. 

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

2 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

Do they measure people or do the players just tell (whoever) what their height is?  

Height person:  What height are you?

Player:  I'm 190 centimeters

HP : Are you sure, you don't look that tall?

Player:  You're not allowed to talk to me like that

HP:  You're right, sorry.  See you later, titch!  Next!!

Edited by Macca

 
2 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

That’s ridiculous. Publish everyone’s weight or no one’s weight. I can’t imagine there’d be female athletes who’re against having their weight known. If they are, maybe they’re in the wrong profession. 🤷‍♀️ 

19 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

That’s ridiculous. Publish everyone’s weight or no one’s weight. I can’t imagine there’d be female athletes who’re against having their weight known. If they are, maybe they’re in the wrong profession. 🤷‍♀️ 

well, i now won't be able to say "who's that big sheila in the ruck" 

and presumably "who's that big fella in the ruck".  😲

Edited by daisycutter


1 hour ago, Macca said:

Do they measure people or do the players just tell (whoever) what their height is?  

Height person:  What height are you?

Player:  I'm 190 centimeters

HP : Are you sure, you don't look that tall?

Player:  You're not allowed to talk to me like that

HP:  You're right, sorry.  See you later, titch!  Next!!

Every players height and weight gets done from development through seniors and done every season 

6 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Every players height and weight gets done from development through seniors and done every season 

I was being flippant, PSD

Although, I do question the actual height of a few players but I won't name names!

I just do not understand how reporting weight would be offensive..

we are talking about weight due to muscle mass, not obese fat.. (mostly)

what is  next, we do not report weight in boxing.?

 

Next will be height as short players may feel offended. [censored].


44 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

Next will be height as short players may feel offended. [censored].

Stop offending people…..

So... can we say that player x is as wide as they are high?😁

Only if his surname is "Choad"

Weird move by AFL, think there are more pressing issues. Seems like a political correctness agenda. Might make match ups a little tricker for opposition analysts with access to oppositions heights only. Might have to get WikiLeaks onto this stuff.

According to Ch7 the aFL have made the move so that players won’t be “Fat Shamed”, what an absolute load of garbage. Oohh I am so Woke I can’t stand up straight. Lol.!!!!


this is what is bizarre

reporting of weight is not about fat shaming in elite sport...

mostly it is interesting for the young new rookies...

is new player x  90+kg's,  ooh they may be able to play 1st year.

is player x 70kg,  Ok, they are a few years away, they need to PUT ON A FEW KG'S...

strength/muscle bulk mass vs agility/speed debate.... nothing to do with fat, because elite players are not fat.

13 hours ago, picket fence said:

So... can we say that player x is as wide as they are high?😁

 

7 hours ago, Checker Mate said:

Only if his surname is "Choad"

😅

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

The fat shaming was the old skin folds test, you would come off your break and see the callipers and you knew your were in trouble.  Then coming back after Christmas always 3-4km time trail and skin fold test.

 
1 hour ago, drdrake said:

The fat shaming was the old skin folds test, you would come off your break and see the callipers and you knew your were in trouble.  Then coming back after Christmas always 3-4km time trail and skin fold test.

The dreaded callipers. 😱
One afternoon last week Fritta was at his mum’s. She said, “Are you staying for dinner, Bayles?” He said, “Depends on what you’re cooking, I’ve got a fat-pinch and a 2k-er tomorrow.” She was cooking a creamy pasta dish. He didn’t stay for dinner. 😁


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Way back in March we contemplated the possibility of a Demon resurgence after Simon Goodwin’s summer of love. Many issues at the club had seemingly been addressed, key players were returning from injury and a brand new day was about to dawn. We imagined the coach pulling a rabbit out of a hat. The team would roar up the charts, push aside every opponent and make its way to a Grand Final ending in ultimate triumph with Goody and Max holding the premiership cup aloft under a shower of red and blue ticker tape.

    • 3 replies
  • AFLW REPORT: Western Bulldogs

    We’re back! That was fun. The Mighty Dees’ Season 10 campaign is off toa flying start with a commanding 48-point winover the Western Bulldogs, retaining the Hampson-Hardeman Cup in style. After a hard-fought first half in slippery conditions, the Dees came out in the second half and showcased their trademark superior class, piling on four goals in the third termand never looked back.

    • 3 replies
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    The final score in Saturday's game against Hawthorn was almost identical to that from their last contest three months ago. Melbourne suffered comprehensive defeats in both games, but the similarities ended there.When they met in Round 9, the Demons were resurgent, seeking to redeem themselves after a lacklustre start to the season. They approached the game with vigour and dynamism, and were highly competitive for the first three quarters, during which they were at least on par with the Hawks. In the final term, they lapsed into error and were ultimately overrun, but the final result did not accurately reflect their effort and commitment throughout the match.

    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Box Hill

    The Casey Demons ended the regular season on a positive note and gained substantial momentum leading into the finals when they knocked the Box Hill Hawks off the top of the VFL ladder in their final round clash at Casey Fields. More importantly, they moved out of a wild card position in the finals race and secured a week's rest as they leapfrogged up the ladder into fifth place with their decisive 23-point victory over the team that had been the dominant force in the competition for most of the season.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    The final game of the 2025 Season is finally upon us and the Demons may have an opportunity to spoil the Magpies Top 4 aspirations when they face them on Friday Night. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 116 replies
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 18th August @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Hawthorn.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 42 replies

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.