Jump to content

Featured Replies

28 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

The strong lure home is a big pile of cash!

We’re about $1.5M per year in the black after Grundy, Harmes, Jordon, Hibberd and Dunstan. 

Surely we can find whatever cash we need. 

 
10 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

I get the appeal. But we’d be cutting back a fair bit and would be the wrong type of player to trade out just as May is entering twilight.

Turner has given us a small sample size, when playing along side May & Lever. Particularly the Sydney game. 

On 10/4/2023 at 2:58 PM, DeeZone said:

Can I just respond to Tom Morris - Ha Ha Ha ha……..Ha Ha ha….!!!! Your a real killer Tom.!!!

What kills me about Morris is he is allegedly a Melbourne supporter.  Why he's trying to decimate the club with his crappy reporting I'll never know. 

 
On 10/4/2023 at 1:48 PM, Demonland said:

When it rains it pours.

 

What is that stuff??


If Petty wants to go home then he’s essentially saying he wants to go back to live in a country town and not play AFL. His “home” is not Adelaide. It’s not even near Adelaide. The lure might be his Adelaide based girlfriend, but at 23 that relationship may not last. Or his girlfriend might relocate to Melbourne. 
 

2 years is a long time when you are 23 years old. I’m not letting him go unless he’s categorically unwilling to stay or his foot is busted. We can always trade him next year while he’s contracted after he won us a flag kicking 50 goals 😀

On paper picks 10 & 20 look good, however we all know drafting kids are unknown so it is a massive risk, given we know what Petty can produce already as a 23 year old!

There's a reason teams like Geelong & Sydney are so strong, they don't get stuck in an eternal pick loop thinking draft picks will save them.

I'd personally rather trade for established players than use draft picks on most occasions.

So in summary, no I wouldn't be trading Petty and would back ourselves to keep him in 2 years time.

 

Are we into someone else at Adelaide? They are just trying to talk this up and its very strange to do so after Lambs comments...

(ok ignore the above have just caught up on the rumours thread about Fogarty. Explains the bleating from Adelaide. )

Edited by Robbie57

Crows and media are nothing but pants sniffers. Petty couldnt possibly be considering playing for those weirdos. Hes contracted anyway.

Why cant the media just leave MFC alone for once.

f....off


On the assumption we're chips in on next year's flag rather than taking a potential step back:

Petty should only be traded if Harry McKay or an equivalent proven key forward is coming through the doors. And even McKay won't solve our atrocious conversion for goal under pressure (although he once kicked 58.33 in a season)

I cannot fathom how the list management and coaching team will be confident of winning next year's flag with T Mac, BBB and JVR as our 3 best key forwards, while losing Petty and not recruiting another established KPF. The fact that they (probably) called T Hawkins shows you how the club feels about their tall forward depth chart, and how life would look like without Petty.

Unless we get a proven 35-40 goal a year tall forward which is what Petty is highly likely to kick next year off a 20+ game season, then we'll hold Petty to his contract.


2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

Barrett is as reliable as a Politician, all BS.

4 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

I've been told that Petty has said no and I'm standing by that. 

6 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

Damo, from Ive been told, and as of right now, is more than happy to live inside a toilet booth. 

Where is old mate TGR when you need him. Petty is one of his beloved "multi dimensional talls".

You draft players at any point in the draft and develop them to get to the precise point that HP is at now.  Entering his prime.  That's where you get full return on your investment. 

Those looking at prospective draft picks for Petty as "setting us up for the future" should remind themselves that Harry is only 23 and should be viewed as a big part of not just our present but our future as well. 

And FWIW I'm one of those who believe that we were only a fit Harry Petty away from winning the whole damn thing in 2023

Edited by Go the Biff
sp

Looks like we are holding firm......

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/trade-news-three-teams-involved-in-pick-swap-as-demons-hold-firm-on-harrison-petty-after-big-offer-from-crows/news-story/d59da9f9e77d17692f800fb937a9f084

"Melbourne will not flinch on holding contracted defender Harrison Petty to his contract as they prepare to offer Adelaide a pick in the 30s for forward Shane McAdam.

Adelaide is understood to have offered South Australian 197cm forward Petty a long-term front-ended deal that could hit as much as $800,000 a season across the life of the contract.

In response Melbourne, which has Petty contracted for two more seasons, is understood to be open to extending his contract at more lucrative terms to ensure the 23-year-old stays at the Demons.

Despite Petty being open-minded to a move back to South Australia at some stage, the Demons can hold firm given he is a contracted player."


In a great surprise to no one, Petty’s strong lure home is Adelaide offering him enough cash to own most of South Australia.

The AFL is such a joke. Most leagues around the world would ban tampering and not allow clubs to just get in the ear of contracted players. 

Wont go away:

 

 

Urgh as much as this is most likely media smoke its so irritating.

Petts so important to this teams success. He's looking like the best key forward we've had since Hogan. I don't think we lost a game with him at forward this year (still baffled as to why we sent him back). I watched him closely and even in games where he didn't score much he was so so effective in his positioning and using his body to create space for himself and others. 

His ability to read the ball, lead with pace, mark strongly, use his body and kick straight (12.1) is unmatched on this team AND he's only 23. Skies the limit. MUST KEEP.

 

That’s big money for Petty. 
 

Given the contract being offered and the contract status of Petty currently surely they would be paying a minimum of 2 first round picks for him 

Adelaide throwing the toys out of the cot....


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 217 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies