Jump to content

Maynard must get at least four weeks

leave it to deever
leave it to deever
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Also for the first time this year it did  look like the Umpiring was letting things including play ons go from the outset.

 

The Maynard incident reminds me of Mark Yeats shirtfronting an unsuspecting Dermott Brereton in the ‘89 Grand Final.

Both incidents were in the opening minutes, as if planned.

    • Like 5
    34 minutes ago, Macca said:

    I'm baffled that so many have convinced themselves that Maynard's actions was a footy act so therefore he should get off

    Have they not noted the 60+ plus players who have been suspended this season for bumping & tackling.  These are also footy acts

    And the consequences of all those suspensions from all those footy acts were not as drastic as the Gus concussion

    But that's if it was a footy act.  All the tackles and bumps looked like footy acts but Maynard's was a fake smother.  Token and designed to confuse.  A con

    I am astounded how the smother action is so front and centre in the discussion, especially by former “Old Guard”footballers. All the precedents thrown up by the Old Guard about footy actions often involve a footy in dispute, a marking contest, a collision of players hunting a bouncing ball. 
    In this case we have a ball carrier being taken out at high speed, front on by a player who made a bee line for him. It’s a front on charge. Forget the jump in the air that is only relevant in that it made the collision worse, it does not excuse the result. Let us be honest it was a case of White Line Fever, three minutes into a do or die final, gone astray with dire consequences for Brayshaw. Maynard failed to show a duty of care for his opponent in this case.
     

    No doubt the lawyers will differ. 

    • Like 13
    • Love 1
     
    1 minute ago, Earl Hood said:

    I am astounded how the smother action is so front and centre in the discussion, especially by former “Old Guard”footballers. All the precedents thrown up by the Old Guard about footy actions often involve a footy in dispute, a marking contest, a collision of players hunting a bouncing ball. 
    In this case we have a ball carrier being taken out at high speed, front on by a player who made a bee line for him. It’s a front on charge. Forget the jump in the air that is only relevant in that it made the collision worse, it does not excuse the result. Let us be honest it was a case of White Line Fever, three minutes into a do or die final, gone astray with dire consequences for Brayshaw. Maynard failed to show a duty of care for his opponent in this case.
     

    No doubt the lawyers will differ. 

    Yep, I saw it exactly the same way right from the outset

    And what makes the narrative even more confusing is that those advocating the whole footy act bs are often quite cynical and a fair bit street-smart

    The ex-players should be seeing through the whole charade

    But again, they also (in my view) fall into the redneck view ... "What are they turning the game into" (with the usual, lame reference to netball)

    So that's what we're up against, EH

    • Like 3
    45 minutes ago, Bystander said:

    To try to prove malice or intent in Player Maynard's actions on that real-time footage is IMO impossible.

    There is no requirement to prove malice or intent - reckless which it was, though the AFL have softened their language to careless, with high comtact and high outcome = 4+ weeks, minimum.

    • Like 3

    12 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

    ball carrier being taken out at high speed

    Angus was actually no longer the ball carrier - he had kicked it and it went over Maynard's head well before contact was made, forcefully, high, with devastating consequences.

    • Like 5
    • Clap 1
    Just now, monoccular said:

    Angus was actually no longer the ball carrier - he had kicked it and it went over Maynard's head well before contact was made, forcefully, high, with devastating consequences.

    The ball was not in dispute, that is my point, it was not in the air or bouncing around unpredictably, it was in Angus’ possession until he belatedly was able to get foot to ball. 
    It’s the same if a ball carrier passes off by hand but is taken out, front on by an opponent coming at them. Free kick and reportable if it is high with severe consequences. 

    • Like 3

    Where's he gone?

    Nanna nap?

    • Haha 1
     

    Good to hear the media narrative change a bit

    there might be a chance a suspension holds up to appeal after all

    • Like 3

    Scott and Lyon both saying in reality he is guilty. Scott said at training, would he do that and then take out a team mate?

    • Like 5

    My most hated narrative of all is that Gus should have protected himself. I literally can’t. 

    • Like 6
    • Angry 1
    4 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

    My most hated narrative of all is that Gus should have protected himself. I literally can’t. 

    Even worse Jaded, some idiots are saying our doctors shouldn't let him play because of a previous concussion in the first minute of the game.

    Or that a guy wearing a helmet should know the risk or don't bother playing in the AFL at all.

    Collingwood mob is really something else.

    • Like 3
    7 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

    Even worse Jaded, some idiots are saying our doctors shouldn't let him play because of a previous concussion in the first minute of the game.

    Or that a guy wearing a helmet should know the risk or don't bother playing in the AFL at all.

    Collingwood mob is really something else.

    Buckley said that on On the Couch 🤮

    • Angry 1
    • Vomit 1
    8 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Scott and Lyon both saying in reality he is guilty. Scott said at training, would he do that and then take out a team mate?

    Exactly. Maynard didn't mean to concuss Angus but he was looking to collect a body on the way down. 

    Old school clumsy Shane Mumford style. Make sure to collect a body on the way through. 

    • Like 3
    1 hour ago, bandicoot said:

    All they’ll need to prove is that he had another option. Instead of turning mid air with his shoulder he had the option of landing with hands forward in a bracing motion. 

    The other other option was not to charge full pelt at Brayshaw and launch into the air in the first place. Duty of care, likely to lead to a reportable offence etc.

    • Like 1

    Kudos to Garry Lyon on On The Couch who's the only who with a brain on that show.

    Did a special shout out to the Brayshaw and Frawley family and that trauma this would be bringing them, only to then put up with Brown and Buckley who were on the opposite end of the table in their argument. 

     

    • Like 2
    • Love 1
    3 hours ago, chookrat said:

    WCW, Michael Christensen graded the incident as careless, severe impact and high impact and under the Tribunal Guidelines all reportable severe impact incidents are automatically referred to the Tribunal. Here is the link to the actual match review as reported by the AFL.

    https://www.afl.com.au/news/1026111/match-review-collingwood-magpies-defender-brayden-maynard-learns-fate-over-angus-brayshaw-collision

    The above directly contradicts the false narrative that Michael Christensen did not deem the incident as reportable.  If I were to speculate the reason for the joint report is that Laura is backing in and supporting the MRO in what is a very high profile incident, while the media is looking for the best headline.

    No - it was mentioned on the footy media circuit that he wanted it thrown out and would put his job in the line. Took 5 hours of discussion with the GM to reach an agreement.

     

    Corporate speak for your sacked but you have 4 weeks notice so look busy and we’ll announce at the end of the season. 

    • Like 1
    • Clap 1
    25 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Scott and Lyon both saying in reality he is guilty. Scott said at training, would he do that and then take out a team mate?

    Was it just me or did Ross Lyon seem drunk 

    • Haha 1
    1 minute ago, brendan said:

    Was it just me or did Ross Lyon seem drunk 

    Mad Monday??? 🤪


    15 minutes ago, KLV said:

    Buckley said that on On the Couch 🤮

    What a flagless f-stick.

    • Haha 2
    2 minutes ago, brendan said:

    Was it just me or did Ross Lyon seem drunk 

    He is always like that.

    He has a sort of mumbly disjointed speech delivery.

    Met him and Roos in a cafe and mentioned I was a former Dees Official. Lyon was engaging and very nice, while Roos acted like I disturbed his honeymoon evening, totally rude and dismissive.

     

    • Shocked 1
    16 minutes ago, KLV said:

    Buckley said that on On the Couch 🤮

    That for me was a step too far. I lost what little respect I had for him and actually couldn’t believe it tbh. 

    Browny was Browny trying to play the mediator and was arguing the rules around smothering and that Maynard would be unfairly done by being called out on something that wasn’t written in the rules.

    Christ Scott was more accepting of the suspension and that he personally doesn’t see it has a suspension but that he would coach his players not to do that knowing that’ll likely be a suspension in the current game. As others have said I think Lyon was drunk as I had no idea what he was in about. 

    • Like 1
     
    58 minutes ago, Macca said:

    Yep, I saw it exactly the same way right from the outset

    And what makes the narrative even more confusing is that those advocating the whole footy act bs are often quite cynical and a fair bit street-smart

    The ex-players should be seeing through the whole charade

    But again, they also (in my view) fall into the redneck view ... "What are they turning the game into" (with the usual, lame reference to netball)

    So that's what we're up against, EH

    Yes the old players are the most likely people to understand what goes on in a final. They would know the players who can get “white line fever” and what it can lead to. That is what happened 3 minutes into a final. 

    • Like 1
    5 hours ago, jnrmac said:

    You can't get away from the fact he ran at full pace and jumped at Gus's body and then shouldered him in the head.

    The behind the goals footage shows he was nowhere near the ball nor was he going for the ball. In fact you can see him run straight at Gus

    It is malicious, dangerous and reckless. So much so it hasn't happened in the last 20 years that I am aware of (except for maybe the Cripps incident which we all know was a joke because he was Brownlow favourite)

    ...been saying this for a while 'jnrmac'...it's obvious his intent was to put pressure on the kicker. 

    If he was trying to smother he would have jumped toward the ball which was on his right hand side.

    He didn't he just waved a hand at it.

    ...then carried on to his original target, Gus.

    I'm not saying that he deliberately wanted to knock him out, but I'm pretty sure he wanted to let him feel it.

    Edited by rjay

    • Like 2

    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 416 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 111 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All