Jump to content

PREGAME: Rd 21 vs North Melbourne

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

If someone is carrying an injury thats one thing but if we just rest players we will lose next week. What we need is the best team we have and go for a kill. Need some space between us and the Lions if we really want 2nd spot. If we treat this game like an easy win we will get beaten. 

Edited by YearOfTheDees

    • Like 3
    • Clap 1
     
    4 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    Can we give May a rest this week? The poor bloke can barely bend over to pick the ball up.

    Great suggestion- Yes he should be managed this week. Smith to play back to cover him. Gawn out, Grundy in and Viney rested- Sparrow if fit to come in. JJ and Harmes both lucky to survive till Clarry is back. With our forwardline functioning I see Trac almost 100% mid time.

     
    22 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    Can we give May a rest this week? The poor bloke can barely bend over to pick the ball up.

    I reckon that's old age, and no rest will fix it.

    • Like 2

    6 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    IMG_6205.jpeg.edce1729a0e0e57920d7a973f535f556.jpeg

    I know exactly how he feels 🤣

    • Haha 1
     

    I’m happy for us to rest a couple of players against both  North and the Hawks in a couple of weeks. 
    Cats were able to do it last year and still win games and had players in great shape for finals. 
    It’s not like we are resting them and bringing average players in. Hibberd, Grundy, Sparrow are quality replacements.  
    If Sparrow isn’t fit this week I’d hold off until the Hawks game to rest Viney. 

    • Like 2

    This week is probably the last week we have left to tweak and play around with a few things . Also probably the last week to bring in a debutant.

    With Spargo in poor form, and us needing a little more pressure players inside 50 to allow Kosi to play higher up the ground, do we debut AWM, who had a ripper game at Casey? 

    Could replace Woey Jnr, and still allows us to bring Sparrow in for either JJ or Harmes. 

    • Like 2

    We're building cohesion and momentum in the run-up to finals. I doubt we'll rest anyone. 

    • Like 4

    I’d be shocked if we rested Max and Viney, just cannot see it. And I’d love to see the look on May’s face when they tell him he’s being ‘managed’ this week. 

    Edited by Dee Zephyr

    • Like 1
    7 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

     And I’d love to see the look on May’s face when they tell him he’s being ‘managed’ this week. 

     

    Let Melksham break the news... 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 7

    I truly do not understand the calls for Dunstan to be picked. He's another in a long line of great accumulators with poor disposal skills. Players like him look great at VFL level. We've had our fair share before with players like Magner, Valenti, McKenzie and Godfrey. All looked fantastic at VFL level but found wanting in the seniors. 

    We shouldn't be "resting" players on game day. They can get plenty of rest during the week, if they need it. If they are injured or sore, that's different. The only changes I would make are to bring in Oliver and Sparrow if ready, probably for Woewodin and Harmes. I can't see a spot for Hibberd unless a defender is injured. 

    • Like 7

    We will manage our players without dropping them through reducing TOG. May will get a rest as the ball will not be in our D50. Max can also spend time behind the ball while JVR is doing the F50 rucking. Either way, it is full steam ahead right now, we've put the work in during the season to let it rip till finals. All gas no breaks. 

    In: Clarry (I hope), Sparrow (if fit) 

    Out: JJ, Harmes

    I'd also consider Hibbo for Bowey/McVee. Hibbo is too good for the VFL but so are the other two. Gus may play extra backline minutes with 2 mids returning, but I think Hibbo is best 22 and needs to fit in somewhere. 

    • Like 1

    2 hours ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    Can we give May a rest this week? The poor bloke can barely bend over to pick the ball up.

    Given he’s been that way for 2 years what makes you think a rest will help?

    He’s afraid to get tackled and caught holding the ball or illegal disposing it, it’s a mental problem not a physical one. 

    • Haha 1

    Magnificent success of the Petty, JVR, Melksham combination - that has to continue for the foreseeable future until Fritsch returns, but then I'm firmly in the Fritsch OR Melksham camp because of the associated forward pressure.

    I'm firmly in the three tall defenders camp too, so that means it's Tomlinson or Smith.  I'm leaning towards Smith for his athleticism which complements May, who has lost his and, Lever who can lumber.  That means it's McVee vs Hibberd IMO.  But did anyone else think that it appeared that Salem can't bend down?  He took some nice marks and made some nice plays towards the end of the game but there was at least one ground ball where he starkly tried to soccer it instead of bending down.  I feel he has an injury and that may open a spot for Hibberd, at least temporarily.

    Alright, now to the major thesis, like Ulysses' sailors, I'm sticking to my line that the reason Max has been able to dominate solo for 3 matches is because Grundy has lessened his load throughout the season.  I think it's seductive to hear the sirens' call that we go with him solo for the run in. but I remain doubtful that he can sustain the rage.  In the next two weeks we have North (Goldstein and Xerri) and Carlton (Pittonet and TDK) who play two rucks, in addition Casey have the bye, I'm pretty sure the plan will have been to bring Grundy back against North and that's what I think we should do.

    He needs to come in for a small, most likely Woewodin, and that will place more load on our midfield which isn't ideal.  Sparrow for JJ will help.  I thought Harmes was pretty good apart from his two sprayed shots early and I'd retain him and maximise his minutes against North.  I'd bring Smith into the team for Tomlinson, and go with a mid as sub to enable us to spread the midfield load that results from the loss of a small.

    In: Grundy, Smith, Sparrow
    Out: Woewodin, Tomlinson, JJ
    Sub: JJ

    The thesis gets interesting at the pointy end though.  We may decide that there comes a point where we go with Max solo again at the crunch, and Grundy is sacrificed, like a lead-out rider in the TDF, for team glory.

    • Like 6
    • Love 1

    Rest players in game. I reckon most of our guns will have lower TOG% this week and the role players will cover it.

    • Like 4
    15 hours ago, old55 said:

    I'd bring Grundy in to give Max an easier game. North have Goldstein and Xerri. We'd have to go with one less small in the rotation, probably Woey. Harmes (74%), Jordon (69%) to play more gametime.

    Who goes out for Grundy? This is the issue he’s facing. He has no logical swap besides perhaps JVR???

    • Like 1
    • Shocked 1

    8 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

    Who goes out for Grundy? This is the issue he’s facing. He has no logical swap besides perhaps JVR???

    My more detailed plan is above, RIF

    • Like 2
    4 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

    It's to give Gawn a chop out for a week. He'll more than likely get dropped for the Carlton game when we get Clarry back.

    Ah that makes sense if we give gawn a rest

    5 hours ago, Hawny for Gawny said:

    Not based on Grundy form rather he has played well when playing #1 ruck and it is a chance to rest Max before finals, obviously I'm not a fitness expert and the high fitness coaches know what they are doing but Gawn is vital to a premiership push and playing him against Norf and him taking a beating again isn't necessary espaiclly with Grundy as an option.

    No I def agree if we give gawn a rest. I think from a conditioning perspective though as it's a grinding role we would want him to keep playing. It's a hard one!

     

     

     
    4 minutes ago, Tracca said:

    No I def agree if we give gawn a rest. I think from a conditioning perspective though as it's a grinding role we would want him to keep playing. It's a hard one!

     

     

    Yea realistically only Selwyn and his crew will have a good idea about whether he just needs the minutes in game or a rest to make sure he's good to go, I trust the FD to manage him correctly.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    16 hours ago, old55 said:

    I'd bring Grundy in to give Max an easier game. North have Goldstein and Xerri. We'd have to go with one less small in the rotation, probably Woey. Harmes (74%), Jordon (69%) to play more gametime.

    I agree. if not resting Max entirely at least lighten his workload a touch. Plus it provides a chance to experiment with Grundy in the forward line. He won't be learning much forward craft at Casey with a bye or scratch match at best

    • Like 1

    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • CASEY: Collingwood

      It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
      The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
      Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 216 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Like
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 528 replies
      Demonland
    View All