Jump to content

Featured Replies

Brown being dropped 5 weeks prior to finals is not a good sign for him. I'm disappointed - I really hoped he could get himself going and be the key forward we really need. 

Either Petty or Smith gets his spot, presumably Petty. IMO, Petty has to make it as a forward because Tomlinson deserves to hold his spot over Petty in the backline.

I'm also disappointed that Dunstan can't get a game over Harmes. I feel like we've seen enough of Harmes in 2023 and we had moved past what he had to offer. I hope he proves me wrong, and I can understand the FD being reluctant to bring in Dunstan who hasn't played all year, but I just feel this isn't the right move.

 

Would Hibbo come in and Riv play midfield minutes? Petty for Brown. Not sure how, but love to see Smith in the 22. 

15 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Brown being dropped 5 weeks prior to finals is not a good sign for him. I'm disappointed - I really hoped he could get himself going and be the key forward we really need. 

Either Petty or Smith gets his spot, presumably Petty. IMO, Petty has to make it as a forward because Tomlinson deserves to hold his spot over Petty in the backline.

I'm also disappointed that Dunstan can't get a game over Harmes. I feel like we've seen enough of Harmes in 2023 and we had moved past what he had to offer. I hope he proves me wrong, and I can understand the FD being reluctant to bring in Dunstan who hasn't played all year, but I just feel this isn't the right move.

Completely agree regards Harmes and Dunstan. 
Harmes is a bit too Hollywood with his intent. Is there an instruction for him to take on the tackler as much as he does?
Only to lose the ball due to incorrect disposal?

is it that Dunstan is just another inside bull that we already have surplus of? And for that reason he can’t get a game? 

 
13 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Remember the 98 game both had to win to make the 8, we were in good form and we’re just to good. We ended the round 4th on the ladder and steamrolled the eventual premiers Adelaide in the first final the following week 

Was that the Jeff Farmer huge mark atop Gary Lyon's head? ❤️💙

1 hour ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

We need someone who can take marks and kick goals, that is the job of a key fwd. Can anyone remember how many games he played as a fwd this year? I can’t but he’s only kicked the 4 goals. People like Smith as the sub because he can play fwd or back, so can Petty. I’d like to see Smith get a full game up fwd with JVR and Petty can be the sub.

JVR, essentially a single position player, as sub???   Petty maybe, though, if he has recovered from his chest injury he needs game time, not bench warming.

I've been hoping to see Tomlinson in defence and Petty forward since last year. I know many already regard Petty forward as a fail but I'm very interested to see how it plays out. 

Out of all the KPFs we've tried over the past 2 years - the combinations of M Brown, Ben Brown, Wiedemann, McDonald, Gawn, Jackson, Grundy - very little seems to have worked but Petty and Van Rooyen gave me the most confidence and just seemed like a really exciting, young combination.

Forward connection has improved in recent weeks with ANB, Pickett and Chandler all returning to some good form.

Hopefully this is the week we solidify our forward structure moving into the finals.


3 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

And we STILL experiment not far from Finals PAARK ME!

10 minutes ago, picket fence said:

And we STILL experiment not far from Finals PAARK ME!

So you’ve been happy with Browns output since he has come back in?

Seriously???

3 minutes ago, Billy said:

So you’ve been happy with Browns output since he has come back in?

Seriously???

Billy - he has done a bit good stuff particularly early in games and up the field, but sadly his body does not allow him to run out a game, which means our sub has to be someone who an play his forward rôle.

And that in itself is not a viable option going forward.

Edited by monoccular

 
22 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Completely agree regards Harmes and Dunstan. 
Harmes is a bit too Hollywood with his intent. Is there an instruction for him to take on the tackler as much as he does?
Only to lose the ball due to incorrect disposal?

is it that Dunstan is just another inside bull that we already have surplus of? And for that reason he can’t get a game? 

I don't see that as Hollywood.  Maybe a reflection of some lost speed in the last few years and is therefore looking to use brute strength to try and evade more often.  More through necessity?  Gets caught out alot trying the fend off now, even at VFL level.

13 minutes ago, Billy said:

So you’ve been happy with Browns output since he has come back in?

Seriously???

Yep adds structure !


3 hours ago, Damo said:

I have lost faith in Petty this year. Im not surprised its just me BTW. But after one half of good football so far this whole year, why does he again get picked?

Agree overated player!

19 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

I don't see that as Hollywood.  Maybe a reflection of some lost speed in the last few years and is therefore looking to use brute strength to try and evade more often.  More through necessity?  Gets caught out alot trying the fend off now, even at VFL level.

A very valid observation. 

30 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Billy - he has done a bit good stuff particularly early in games and up the field, but sadly his body does not allow him to run out a game, which means our sub has to be someone who an play his forward rôle.

And that in itself is not a viable option going forward.

Agree

If he can’t run out a full game he doesn’t deserve a game in a team that’s in the premiership race

6 hours ago, monoccular said:

Was that the Jeff Farmer huge mark atop Gary Lyon's head? ❤️💙

JVR, essentially a single position player, as sub???   Petty maybe, though, if he has recovered from his chest injury he needs game time, not bench warming.

I think you have misread what I wrote, Smith to get a full game up fwd with JVR and Petty can be the sub.

7 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

I don't see that as Hollywood.  Maybe a reflection of some lost speed in the last few years and is therefore looking to use brute strength to try and evade more often.  More through necessity?  Gets caught out alot trying the fend off now, even at VFL level.

Of course it's hollywood.

He's 27, in the prime of his career. You think he's lost speed?! What on earth.

Since he began playing AFL footy, he has always looked to fend off before giving first option which has been a bugbear of mine and many Melbourne supporters as more often than not, he gets caught. He also loves to try and pick a ball off the ground one handed instead of two far too often. Another trait that sees him lose contests regularly.

He's a player who should just do the basics well and understand the importance of that, but doesn't. Which is why he's not in the best 22 when everyone is fit and firing. 


8 hours ago, McQueen said:

Completely agree regards Harmes and Dunstan. 
Harmes is a bit too Hollywood with his intent. Is there an instruction for him to take on the tackler as much as he does?
Only to lose the ball due to incorrect disposal?

is it that Dunstan is just another inside bull that we already have surplus of? And for that reason he can’t get a game? 

Replacing Sparrow who is an inside mid and Viney needs help in there he has carried the midfield d on his own for 4 weeks cant keep doing it in my view

 

I would have rested Sparrow anyway has is output has dropped over the last few weeks

Harmes is not a reliable replacement in my view Too loose too slow not inside enough 

As I said elsewhere Viney needs help at the moment Dunstan in good form is ideal

Hope the midfield doesn’t miss Sparrow too much. We’ve lost the only game he’s missed V Port.
Harmes to replace him if we’re going like for like, although his senior appearances have been terrible this year. But as they say if you throw a bunch of darts at a board, one is eventually going to land.

Glad Tomlinson got another game. We’ve won our last 14 games in a row with the May/Lever/Tomo combo dating back to the last 2 games of 2020. I know the boys on the DL podcast say that May and Lever prefer Petty over Tomo but the raw win/loss stat suggests that this combo works.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

10 hours ago, Roost it far said:

I want us to do them slowly

I’d prefer to crush them early and have a procession through to the final siren. Much better for my heart.

13 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Hope the midfield doesn’t miss Sparrow too much. We’ve lost the only game he’s missed V Port.
Harmes to replace him if we’re going like for like, although his senior appearances have been terrible this year. But as they say if you throw a bunch of darts at a board, one is eventually going to land.

Glad Tomlinson got another game. We’ve won our last 14 games in a row with the May/Lever/Tomo combo dating back to the last 2 games of 2020. I know the boys on the DL podcast say that May and Lever prefer Petty over Tomo but the raw win/loss stat suggests that this combo works.

Dunstan by a fair way on form atm BBP.  Also goes pretty well inside, especially at distributing to players well outside the inner ring by hand which opens up the lanes and looks coming inisde 50.

Nice pick up on the May / Lever / Tomo combo.

Prior to his knee going against North in 21 that was the go to line up.  Just got unlucky imv.

Is now back to career best form.


12 hours ago, Damo said:

I have lost faith in Petty this year. Im not surprised its just me BTW. But after one half of good football so far this whole year, why does he again get picked?

Yes, he should be under more scrutiny 

3 hours ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

I think you have misread what I wrote, Smith to get a full game up fwd with JVR and Petty can be the sub.

Can't see how Smith can contimue to be a dynamic sub if he doesn't get the occasional full game to maintain touch, form, match fitness & confidence in them.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

10 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Brown being dropped 5 weeks prior to finals is not a good sign for him. I'm disappointed - I really hoped he could get himself going and be the key forward we really need. 

Either Petty or Smith gets his spot, presumably Petty. IMO, Petty has to make it as a forward because Tomlinson deserves to hold his spot over Petty in the backline.

I'm also disappointed that Dunstan can't get a game over Harmes. I feel like we've seen enough of Harmes in 2023 and we had moved past what he had to offer. I hope he proves me wrong, and I can understand the FD being reluctant to bring in Dunstan who hasn't played all year, but I just feel this isn't the right move.

Me too. Have been holding a lot of hope that he would finally get going after showing some really signs before the Crows games. He didn't seem to be moving well in his last match.

It's definitely not the time of the year one wants to get dropped.  Not unreasonable to assume his season is finished. 

But is great to see Tommo rewarded for his hard work. Has done well to fight back ( again) after being dropped from the team that beat Collingwood.

Interesting that Hibbo is back in. Have no idea who would make way for him. Clearly Harmes comes in  for Sparrow. Spargo too is interesting as it's not like Chandler and Kozzie are on thin ice anymore.

Which leaves us with with Petty and Grundy. Does the inclusion of Petty with Tommo mean Petty is back forward? And then what does Grundy do....spend time in the ruck again?

Hard to figure what will happen with these new soldiers.

I do feel bad for Bbb. He looks somewhat hampered by injuries. Also at this stage of the season I don't think we will see Tmac again. In fact given his last two seasons, I would not be surprised if Tom hung up his boots.

 

 

Edited by leave it to deever

 
9 hours ago, picket fence said:

Yep adds structure !

I don't say this often Picket but I'm with you. I think having Brown has straightened us up and I felt like the goals were coming. I'm not sold on Petty forward, but Tommo has been in ripper form and deserves his spot so I can see from the POV of the selection committee that they want Petty in the 22.

But we need Petty to become a consistent 1-2 goal a game player if we're sacrificing the forward craft experience that we get from Brown.

I'm willing to back this move and turning a negative into a positive at least we have players to come in and out that we know can do a job if needs be. Plus Melksham has been turning back the clock with this late season run, if Fritta gets fit prior to finals and we throw him in I personally have the mix as follows:

Chandler Petracca Melk

Fritta JVR Kozzie

Obviously the spots will change, I then have Petty/Brown coming off the bench to rotate with JVR. I have a bad feeling for Tommo that the selection committee are waiting for one bad game and then he's back to Casey. It's so harsh and I hope that it isn't that black and white, but Petty is a natural defender, I think that where they want him for finals.

Also just an aside, Smith has become the super sub. Two weeks in a row he has come on and made an immediate impact (though he needed to celebrate that "touched" goal harder, if the soft call had been on our side it would've been given!).

10 hours ago, SPC said:

Would Hibbo come in and Riv play midfield minutes? Petty for Brown. Not sure how, but love to see Smith in the 22. 

The Rivers in the midfield would make the Hibbo selection understandable. Hope it happens. Petty forward would account for him in the same team as Tommo. I don't get where Spargo would fit in and Grundy not forward brings everything back to square one. Although Gawn needs some relief.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thumb Down
      • Haha
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 528 replies