Jump to content

Featured Replies

Gutless performance.  Going by our mediocre club standards I guarantee management are itching to re-sign Goodie for another 3 years and drive a nail into the coffin.  No wonder why people aren't turning up.

Outside of a freakish run in 2021 with no injuries there has been nothing to commend strategically from this coach.  He's a fish out of water and gets outcoached consistently by far worse teams.

Players have zero passion,the skills are still woeful and the gameplan is rubbish and one-dimensional.  Our forward line has somehow got EVEN WORSE.  There's nothing to bring in from Casey that will change this.  

Fuming.

 

 
12 minutes ago, Beetle said:

If someone can please explain to me what Viney’s role was in the first half that’d be great.

if he was ‘supposedly’ tagging Brayshaw with 2 stats v Brayshaws 16 then that is a monumental coaching fail.

Oliver out and you send our number 2 contended ball winner to a tag when Harmes is in the team? Jesus Christ.

Do you think even He could help us??

If Kossie, Roo, Fritta and Spargo nailed their very gettable set shots, all this other wrist slitting would just be noise! 

 
Just now, monoccular said:

Do you think even He could help us??

Is there some form of biblical cross zone strategy he can introduce?

At least the bloke was able to rise in the face of adversity. 

Nathan Buckley was in the Dockers' coaches box during the game. If he is a silent observer then fine, but if he is providing counsel in any way to Longmuir then what nonsense. He's not paid under Freo's soft cap and it's not fair on us to have him providing his expertise to the team. It's akin to having two senior coaches for the day.

As an aside, we're 1-3 as Narrm. Can we drop the name or find a different indigenous name for 2024? Feels like some kind of a curse.


1 hour ago, Orion said:

Whoo!  So much anger.  Makes you wonder what the point is of following a team if it makes you feel like that

It's called passion and not accepting mediocrity.  Not here for participation ribbons.

So I've been told to be more positive and we'll give this a crack:

- Trac played a reasonable game. Battled hard all day, in fact he looked like our only proper midfielder

- May actually played a decent game I thought. Saved at least 2 certain goals.

- Salo needs more games but he put on some ripper tackles. 

- Not Rivers best game bit still had good moments. Our most improved player so far this year.

We're a good team and it may not seem like it right now but I just know we can beat Carlton if we put our minds to it! Stay positive and anything is possible.

7 minutes ago, waynewussell said:

If Kossie, Roo, Fritta and Spargo nailed their very gettable set shots, all this other wrist slitting would just be noise! 

Mmmm, not sure about that.

It wasn't just wayward kicking that's bringing this season undone

 
55 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

If true, why is this? Why do our opponents regularly bring their best pressure against us? 

Arguing that “they know pressure is our weakness” is silly because pressure is every side’s weakness. Sides would bring elite pressure all 23 weeks if they could. But for most, they can’t. 

But why us? Do we invite it somehow? Does the stat go up because we fumble and they get another point for a repeat tackle or something? Is it up because ours is down? (I don’t think it’s this because our pressure was high last week v Port). Do they just view us as a massive threat and gee themselves up for us - the whole “hunter vs hunted” mentality? Is it just plain bad luck?

This is definetly a thing in my eyes - all teams really set themselves to play us. 
We on the other hand, dont often find ways to win easily - need some dominent fwds for that. 

8 minutes ago, Buzzy said:

It's called passion and not accepting mediocrity.  Not here for participation ribbons.

You can be passionat without anger 

Edited by Orion


13 minutes ago, waynewussell said:

If Kossie, Roo, Fritta and Spargo nailed their very gettable set shots, all this other wrist slitting would just be noise! 

And Gus

3 hours ago, BW511 said:

My takeaways from today and the last few weeks;


We are not a united club this year. There’s a selfishness that’s crept back in and everyone is playing to protect their spot. Problem is no one is actually pulling it off.

Whilst we won a flag in 2021 on the back of defence, it’s a very, very taxing style of play. Everyone bemoans our lack of front and centre and the struggles of our small forwards but they are being asked to do too much. It’s simply not sustainable for multiple games and seasons. You need 100% commitment to make this work and teams can only do it for so long.

Maybe the generational talent we supposedly hold is not as great as we think. Gawn, Trac and Clarry are all very good but there are flaws in their games that hurt us.

If other teams are bringing huge effort to beat us, it’s a nice feather in the cap but we eventually have to counter it.

Last one to end the rant, our game plan is so bloody ordinary to watch. I can’t imagine how frustrating it is for the players. We have sucked the enjoyment out of the game in the name of percentages.

I really hope the optimists among Demonland are onto something because I am not convinced we have the list to be a threat this year.

 


 

 

 

A threat to what? I doubt we make it past the semis again, Collingwood, Brisbane and Port are all playing far better and I still think the Cats will come home with a wet sail like usual once they get some more players back.

I'm really dreading the next two weeks now, lucky I can't go Friday but king's birthday is going to be painful.

24 minutes ago, waynewussell said:

If Kossie, Roo, Fritta and Spargo nailed their very gettable set shots, all this other wrist slitting would just be noise! 

But if the first one of those kicks is a goal then the ball goes back to the centre and the future takes on a different path from that point onwards 

Edited by Orion

3 hours ago, Earl Hood said:

Which wing? If you were on the Southern wing, you would have seen a lot of footy close up. If you were on the members wing with me you spent most of the day looking at the f**king big screen to work out what was happening. 

Serious? We were on the southern wing as always and bemoaned the fact they constantly play the members wing so we can't see anything.

10 minutes ago, Orion said:

You can be passionat without anger 

We need controlled aggression 


5 hours ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

Only positives I can find is that with Oliver and Petty in we win that, not convincingly but its 4 points

They lost Darcy for 2 and a half quarters, meaning they also lost Jackson from the forward line. On top of that their leading goalkicker going into this game in Walters was also out. It's not a positive that bringing in our two injured players would get us over the line vs another team missing two key players. 

Edited by mmwd6

3 hours ago, A F said:

I'm sure they're saying the same things down at Geelong. Burn the place, wasted the list, Scott fluked the premiership.

We were pathetic today, but there isn't a veil of negativity on here. There's mental fragility. 

Let's burn the place down of we don't make the top 4. A long way to go yet.

I've generally been pretty positive even back to 2020 when we underachieved but something is off and hasn't seemed right for a while. It's not the losses it's the way we're playing that is the issue. The games moved on and we haven't, Collingwood will run rings around us in 2 weeks. We're just not playing at the level required anymore.

29 minutes ago, layzie said:

So I've been told to be more positive and we'll give this a crack:

- Trac played a reasonable game. Battled hard all day, in fact he looked like our only proper midfielder

- May actually played a decent game I thought. Saved at least 2 certain goals.

- Salo needs more games but he put on some ripper tackles. 

- Not Rivers best game bit still had good moments. Our most improved player so far this year.

We're a good team and it may not seem like it right now but I just know we can beat Carlton if we put our minds to it! Stay positive and anything is possible.

May keeps getting dragged outside of F50 needs to stay at home. Missing that third tall in Petty chasing the lead up forward outside 50.

I don't watch enough VFL footy is Joel Smith worth a crack up forward if BBB is cooked?

 

 

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges

40 minutes ago, Buzzy said:

Gutless performance.  Going by our mediocre club standards I guarantee management are itching to re-sign Goodie for another 3 years and drive a nail into the coffin.  No wonder why people aren't turning up.

Outside of a freakish run in 2021 with no injuries there has been nothing to commend strategically from this coach.  He's a fish out of water and gets outcoached consistently by far worse teams.

Players have zero passion,the skills are still woeful and the gameplan is rubbish and one-dimensional.  Our forward line has somehow got EVEN WORSE.  There's nothing to bring in from Casey that will change this.  

Fuming.

 

Our game is not one dimensional, it's two dimensional, we are happy to run it along both boundary lines.

9 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

May keeps getting dragged outside of F50 needs to stay at home. Missing that third tall in Petty chasing the lead up forward outside 50.

I don't watch enough VFL footy is Joel Smith worth a crack up forward if BBB is cooked?

 

 

Honestly I would have liked Smith to get a go today.


Was at the game and watched Koz intently at times. He just doesn’t put himself in the right spots. Is often lurking in places where the ball has a 10-30% chance of popping out of the pack. He should be the star, but all we’re getting are cameo performances. 
 

Something is seriously up with Fritsch. 
 

Umpiring was dreadful. 
 

Lever needs to stop pulling pained, disappointed faces at his teammates after HE has screwed up. 
 

So we’ve given up on trying to win centre clearances? We’re playing this rebound/turnover jive instead? I would understand such a convoluted approach if we were any good at pulling it off, but it’s not working. We supposedly have the two best rucks in the competition but we’re using their centre bounce tap-work like cake ornaments. Where is the connection between our rucks and rovers? 
 

There is a lot more to be concerned about. I don’t want to go full-meltdown like so many others here are prone to, but that was a very poor performance and the scoreboard flattered us. 
 

Only positive was watching Hibbo, who is becoming one of our most consistent players this season. 

11 minutes ago, layzie said:

Honestly I would have liked Smith to get a go today.

Did nothing at Casey. We are in trouble if we rely on him to fix our forward line.

 

They was an issue in the last quarter, Freo went forward Number 24 for free flew well before the ball arrived took the Melbourne player out of the contest the ball spilled and they got the goal. The number of time I have seen this payed as unrealistic attempt against a Dees player : especially Kysaiah Pickett is frustrating. I don't mind them being payed just pay them all the time or not at all. I don't want to knock Umpiring I just want consistency. The game is getting really hard to watch at the moment.  

43 minutes ago, Orion said:

But if the first one of those kicks is a goal then the ball goes back to the centre and the future takes on a different path from that point onwards 

back-to-the-future-explain.gif.bf46983b1a4a48a61ba3109244274909.gif


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies