Jump to content

Featured Replies

8 hours ago, poita said:

Given that Dunstan is our only genuine midfielder at Casey, losing Harmes would have a significant impact on our midfield depth.

I'm yet to be convinced that Laurie is going to be a long term AFL player, and neither Howes or Woewodin is beating down the door, but none of these are onballers anyway.

We need to be heavily investing in the midfield in this year's draft. 

There is still approx 12 games plus any Finals and as usual some D/Lers are ( as is their rite but it's a painful read of speculation and predictions to judge many times). We have seen JJ and Harmes take the slow way and alternatively Bowser and Judd McVee the fast track to AFL pedigree. 

Jury still out on Howes Taj Deakyn Laurie etc. who can grab the gap to AFL team with 5/6 good games and come in for an injury maybe and voila so we can't discard some who are still on the journey and indeed keep some here in the 24 to 30 category for real and authentic depth. 

 
27 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

It’s not just my view.

But… last week I was taken to task on the subject of what one of our players had said on a particular subject. It wasn’t pleasant, therefore I’m loath to go into anything in any sort of detail, suffice to say Harmesy’s personal issues have nothing to do with him getting or not getting a game. 

Sounds a bit murky.  I'm not sure whether you mean taken to task on here or elsewhere but nvm.  All good WC thanks for the feedback.

5 hours ago, JTR said:

 

5 hours ago, FritschyBusiness said:

Must be a slow news day for the media. 

Let's look at a few things. 

He is contracted until the end of next year
He is a premiership player
He grew up a Melbourne Supporter
He has many close friends at the club
He got snubbed by Brad Scott at the end of last year.

Nothing to see here, move along people. 

Right? Some journo has only a single brain synapsis firing, needs to meet a publication deadline, has donuts story-wise so phones this old chestnut in. Why now? What’s changed? Answer: a grand total of NOTHING. Nothing’s changed. This thread is reminiscent of the Rival Clubs Circling Weids thread. And as was the case with that thread, we’re slowly starting to see the insincere, patronising (and premature) plaudits that are customarily bestowed on much-maligned players when it appears their time as a Demon is nearing the end. Moreover, you can bet these posts will come from the very people who bagged him all along. 

*returns to the puppy thread to remember all that’s good in the world*

 
10 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Sounds a bit murky.  I'm not sure whether you mean taken to task on here or elsewhere but nvm.  All good WC thanks for the feedback.

It was on here. I was made to feel like I was making [censored] up. I snapped back at the implication and was told to calm down. All good, it’s character-building I guess. 
🤷‍♀️

  • Author

Gee whiz 

Appears you can't have a decent footy related discussion on here without the same usuals coming on here beating their chest telling you what you should or shouldn't write on a footy related discussions. 😅

 


  • Author
5 hours ago, Dwight Schrute said:

That's where he and James Jordan will be playing in 24 i suspect. maybe Tommo as well. 

You can make a case that a few clubs could use Tommo as an experienced depth and would certainly play more senior games elsewhere. 

Essendon, WB and Hawthorn are 3 that come to mind.

5 hours ago, FritschyBusiness said:

Please watch more VFL.
Laurie has shown plenty at that level and Woey is developing nicely. 

Have watched plenty. Laurie is not AFL standard. 

Would be surprised if Harmes left or we wanted him to. I am going to say he will sign a new contract. Just a feeling!

 
5 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You don't get it do you?

You actually just named a good player in Jackson leaving our club for bigger coin and family. That's a good player right there leaving after success.

Harmes literally said yes to meeting to meeting up with Essendon last year.

That's pretty much him saying he was up for a change of scenery purely because he wanted more senior opportunities playing as a full time midfielder and he could foresee that his opportunities playing midfield at Melbourne was drying up.. which it has now.

The only reason his not in Essendon colours this year is because Scott didn't bother to turn up to the meeting that Josh Mahoney organised with Harmes.

Believe it or not some players actually don't want to be the 24th player at the club when they know they'd be best 22 at another club. Funny that huh?

I noted Jackson and Bedford because they were both players we wanted to keep. 
Yes Harmes said yes to a meeting. Players say yes to meetings all the time, doesn't mean they are going to leave.

How is Jed Adams tracking.

Have heard nothing about him He is Out of contract next year Second round pick wasn't he?


13 minutes ago, Kent said:

How is Jed Adams tracking.

Have heard nothing about him He is Out of contract next year Second round pick wasn't he?

Played his best game for Casey.

Looks to be developing nicely.

I'd think there is something to this story. He sounds like he's been having a rough trot lately. Whatever the issues he’s been dealing with have been.

I love Harmsey and I’d love nothing more than him to force his way back into the team, I do feel he’s worth having on the list and would like to hang on to him but I can see the other side. He’s found himself in a position where he doesn’t quite offer enough in terms of what our system requires. 

He still has time but I wouldn’t begrudge him exploring his options at season’s end. Will always be a key member of our success and much loved. 
 

7 hours ago, FritschyBusiness said:

Players say yes to meetings all the time, doesn't mean they are going to leave

Yep, Viney had a meeting with Geelong before he signed on again.

11 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You can make a case that a few clubs could use Tommo as an experienced depth and would certainly play more senior games elsewhere. 

Essendon, WB and Hawthorn are 3 that come to mind.

Sydney

  • Author
5 minutes ago, layzie said:

I'd think there is something to this story. He sounds like he's been having a rough trot lately. Whatever the issues he’s been dealing with have been.

I love Harmsey and I’d love nothing more than him to force his way back into the team, I do feel he’s worth having on the list and would like to hang on to him but I can see the other side. He’s found himself in a position where he doesn’t quite offer enough in terms of what our system requires. 

He still has time but I wouldn’t begrudge him exploring his options at season’s end. Will always be a key member of our success and much loved. 
 

I don't think anyone would begrudge him leaving and most certainly will go down a premiership hero. 

But he'll be 28 next year and he has every right to look after his own backyard regardless whether people think being a Melbourne supporter will be his saving grace.

If he can squeeze another 3 years of playing good senior footballer elsewhere then it's a win for Harmesy career!


11 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

It was on here. I was made to feel like I was making [censored] up. I snapped back at the implication and was told to calm down. All good, it’s character-building I guess. 
🤷‍♀️

Disagreements occur on this site all the time. It's what makes things interesting.  The parry and thrust can be quite stimulating and educational. There are quite a few posters who have some wonderful insights and knowledge of the game and share it in generous ways. There are also others who simply lact tact and basic manners. In effect Demonland is a of course like all social media platforms a microcosm .

Some posters can argue with you or correct you in a polite and somtimes jovial manner ( just normal life skills)and of course there are those who through pride, anger or ar5olitis ( as my dad used to so succinctly call it), just cant and for some reason feel good in putting others down.

They're not exclusive to this sight. We deal with them as the bullying boss, the surly sister, bothersome brother, narcissistic neighbour and of course the road rager.

Demonland in its foresight and wisdom has provided us with the wonderful gift of the IGNORE option.

I wish I could use it in everyday life.

For what is worth WCW, your posts are always honest, fun, informative , polite and upbeat.

I thank you for them and all the work you do for the club which is probably more than anyone else posting here.

Cheers.

5 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Disagreements occur on this site all the time. It's what makes things interesting.  The parry and thrust can be quite stimulating and educational. There are quite a few posters who have some wonderful insights and knowledge of the game and share it in generous ways. There are also others who simply lact tact and basic manners. In effect Demonland is a of course like all social media platforms a microcosm .

Some posters can argue with you or correct you in a polite and somtimes jovial manner ( just normal life skills)and of course there are those who through pride, anger or ar5olitis ( as my dad used to so succinctly call it), just cant and for some reason feel good in putting others down.

They're not exclusive to this sight. We deal with them as the bullying boss, the surly sister, bothersome brother, narcissistic neighbour and of course the road rager.

Demonland in its foresight and wisdom has provided us with the wonderful gift of the IGNORE option.

I wish I could use it in everyday life.

For what is worth WCW, your posts are always honest, fun, informative , polite and upbeat.

I thank you for them and all the work you do for the club which is probably more than anyone else posting here.

Cheers.

You're absolutely right Deever, it is something that has been a challenge for me personally but it's the disagreements that make this place the thinking forum that it is and not the slander and hogwash you see on social media.

It can be a challenge disagreeing in text, you just miss so many important aspects of a face to face discussion. You can take the most polite responses in text as an attack if you have the wrong mindset. It's all about having the right one.

7 minutes ago, layzie said:

You're absolutely right Deever, it is something that has been a challenge for me personally but it's the disagreements that make this place the thinking forum that it is and not the slander and hogwash you see on social media.

It can be a challenge disagreeing in text, you just miss so many important aspects of a face to face discussion. You can take the most polite responses in text as an attack if you have the wrong mindset. It's all about having the right one.

I resent that😀

 

Just now, leave it to deever said:

I resent that😀

 

I agree 100% but you're wrong! 😛

Just now, layzie said:

I agree 100% but you're wrong! 😛

You’re both wrong. Only I’m right. 


32 minutes ago, layzie said:

I'd think there is something to this story. He sounds like he's been having a rough trot lately. Whatever the issues he’s been dealing with have been.

I love Harmsey and I’d love nothing more than him to force his way back into the team, I do feel he’s worth having on the list and would like to hang on to him but I can see the other side. He’s found himself in a position where he doesn’t quite offer enough in terms of what our system requires. 

He still has time but I wouldn’t begrudge him exploring his options at season’s end. Will always be a key member of our success and much loved. 
 

Won a flag with the club he supported as a boy, most don't get a fairytale like that.

Worth having on the list but guess it all depends on what how he's ranked internally, list composition, salary cap issues and simultaneously if he can prolong his career at another club. Additionally if he wants more senior minutes due to his age. 

Not sure where he stands in the midfield pecking order now, especially as Pickett and Rivers have gone through the middle a few times AND we need to fit Salem back in this team somehow. 

 

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Played his best game for Casey.

Looks to be developing nicely.

Thanks RL for the update

 
6 minutes ago, roy11 said:

Won a flag with the club he supported as a boy, most don't get a fairytale like that.

Worth having on the list but guess it all depends on what how he's ranked internally, list composition, salary cap issues and simultaneously if he can prolong his career at another club. Additionally if he wants more senior minutes due to his age. 

Not sure where he stands in the midfield pecking order now, especially as Pickett and Rivers have gone through the middle a few times AND we need to fit Salem back in this team somehow. 

 

It's just a state of where the club is right now in terms of the number of players who can fill his spot. I will say as a sheer tagger he's probably our best but as a mid, it's tough out there. He will always be remembered for that sweet, sweet moment on the boundary line where that helped Fritta kick that goal that sparked our comeback to win the flag. May seem a small act and a weird way to define him but boy was I grateful at the time. I hope he stays but I think it would be detrimental to his career.

Quite happy to have Harmsey stay, I think he adds depth. 
Also quite happy for Harmsey to sign a fat final contract with a rival club, if we get good value out of it, and thank you for your service.

That GF pick-up, baulk and pass to Fritta will stick with me forever. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies