Jump to content

Featured Replies

45 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

For those wondering this article says that Lycett trained in their captain's run today but Teakle didn't, therefore suggesting Lycett is going to be brought back to replace Teakle as their ruck.

It also says Dixon trained but wasn't moving freely.

 
3 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

For those wondering this article says that Lycett trained in their captain's run today but Teakle didn't, therefore suggesting Lycett is going to be brought back to replace Teakle as their ruck.

It also says Dixon trained but wasn't moving freely.

According to SA sources much about Dixon playing  is piffle waffle.... He needs to pass a fitness test...as late as Friday.

It's suspected he won't.  I hope he plays ;) 

Looks like tmac 

 

 
7 minutes ago, dino rover said:

Looks like tmac 

yep

Not my choice but if you think of Petty as the up the ground forward it makes sense.

I hope the big dinosaurs in Dixon and Lycett play.  They are underdone and it could be wet.  May and our rucks should run off them and expose them


10 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Taking the absolute [censored]. 
Can he play forward once Salem return?

I know we have 8000 players fighting for a half forward role, but come on!

 

Woo hoo, Go Salo. 


Wow... Salo sounded very confident he was on track & ready arround three / four weeks ago and the window opened!

Was expecting at least 1 week at Casey but there you go.

On 5/17/2023 at 1:56 PM, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Dixon is more likely than unlikely to be playing according to Hinkley.

 

I got this wrong but good news nonetheless.


  • Author

IN: S Lycett 29, D Byrne-Jones 33 

OUT: T Marshall 4, B Teakle 27, J Mead 44 

LAST WEEK’S SUB: J Mead 44 

Round 10 Team Selection 

B: T Jonas 1-C, T McKenzie 12, D Houston 5 
HB: R Burton 3, A Aliir 21, D Williams 23 
C: M Bergman 14, T Boak 10, R Bonner 26 
HF: J McEntee 41, J Finlayson 11, C Rozee 20 
F: Z Butters 9, O Lord 30, S Powell-Pepper 2 
Foll: S Lycett 29, O Wines 16, J Horne-Francis 18 
I/C: D Byrne-Jones, F Evans 31, W Drew 28, K Farrell 6 

Emergencies: T Clurey 17, L Jones 34, J Burgoyne 36, J Mead 44

Now just need Dunstan back to his best to assist Viney in the center with extractions (and from that clearances).

Not sure who he'd replace though.  Maybe JJ for a block of matches.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

Great to see Salem back. Fingers crossed he can stay fit for the rest of the year.


A big surprise with Salo. I hope the club isn’t rushing him back. They did last year and his season really suffered. 

Thrilled with no Dixon. He’s a monster and he always troubles us. 

1 minute ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Now just need Dunstan back to his best to assist Viney in the center clearances.  Not sure who he'd replace though.  Maybe JJ for a block of matches.

Don't think they will play Viney and Dunstan in the same team, Dunstan depth only.

1 minute ago, drysdale demon said:

Don't think they will play Viney and Dunstan in the same team, Dunstan depth only.

Exactly. I don’t know why people don’t understand what Dunstan is. 

 
3 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

Looks like Brayshaw will play midfield. 

I thought the same thing. With McVee, Salem and Bowey back Gus has to go into the middle - probably to play Sparrows role this week.

3 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

Club must be happy with Woewodin.

I’d be happybwith him if he didn’t try to take on the opposition every time he gets it.  


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 527 replies